We name everyting....Yet we no name for our own solar system?!, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 06:01 AM by TylerDurden2U
reply to post by Morg234



wich peoples. How about corporate federation of planets



reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 06:51 AM by St Udio
I am with the FLEETADMIRAL on this one...


the home place of the Planet Earth or Terra Firma would denote the whole System and the Star (Sol)
as being the birthplace of all the local 'Terrestrials... to include Humans along with plants/animals/fish


So it is understood by us local Terrestials/Earthmen that the whole local Sun & system of gas planets & rocky planets that comprise our local solar system would be named after the dominant lifeform in that system...


being known as a 'terrestrial' will only be a category denoting one's homeworld ...as new beings are revealed...

one would suppose that 90% of all independent lifeforms (with space travel abilities) would be evolved on terrestial planets... so the term 'terrestrial' would no longer serve as the definition of our Solar System


Each Solar System would refer to their own Star as a local 'Sun' or equivelent name


so...to define our System (home) we would invoke the dominant creature in that system...the beings that conquered the home planets nature & subdued the planet to the subordinate name of Earth...

the Earth & the Earthlings that dominate this region of space ....
We are the 'Earthling' (solar system) inhabitants...
which distinguishes humans from the plant/animal/aquatic kingdoms who share this planet


Humans are Earthlings = the Solar System is therefore 'Earthling'

other lifeforms on Earth are just Terrestial creatures/life...slang would be 'Terrans'





iow...'Earthling' is used as a Proper Noun, as well as an adjective and an adverb, as it were
edit on 5-12-2011 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 07:37 AM by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by brilab45



What I find odd is that you don't recognize that we do have a name for it. It's called Sol. "Research-iness" is next to godliness ya know lol.


reply posted on 5-12-2011 @ 04:50 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by rationalistswagger



If you're gonna go for "Wizardplex", then why not "Hogwarts"?

That way, you get wizards, and the side analogy of a place of "training and learning" (a common theme).

Plus, Ms. J. K. Rowling can make even more money, since you have to buy the rights from her!!

She would then become the "Queen Witch" and ruler of all the planets. It's a Win-Win.


reply posted on 6-12-2011 @ 08:55 PM by brilab45
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to
post by brilab45



What I find odd is that you don't recognize that we do have a name for it. It's called Sol. "Research-iness" is next to godliness ya know lol.


I made that point right off the bat. Please read your threads before you reply. Thank you.


reply posted on 7-12-2011 @ 05:44 PM by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by brilab45



Sorry...Brain fart I guess. No offense intended. You know how it is....


reply posted on 7-12-2011 @ 08:31 PM by brilab45
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to
post by brilab45



Sorry...Brain fart I guess. No offense intended. You know how it is....


No problem. Thanx for the acknowledgement. That means a great deal here. Some folks are way too much into themselves. Star for you.


reply posted on 10-12-2011 @ 02:21 AM by Tearman
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


If I'm right in believing that the vast majority of astronauts out there in the universe are actually robots working for largely AI-based civilizations, their name for the solar system would probably be something like STAR-SYSTEM 100234913204... possibly indicating its order of discovery. And the name is really nothing more than a serial number by which you can look it up in some giant database.

They wouldn't give the solar system a meaningful name unless it has some kind of special significance within their culture. Since their culture would probably be really different from ours, we wouldn't be able to predict how they go about naming planetary-systems. They probably would never predict the kinds of meaningful names we give stars in our night sky, or what the inspiration for those names are.
edit on 10-12-2011 by Tearman because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^