It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Amazing huge UFO next to Mercury decloaked by Sun Flare

page: 6
107
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:21 AM
link   
reply to post by jonnywhite
 


Aliens in my toilet?
Sure, after I toss the toilet paper in.

www.geekalerts.com...




posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by Vandalour
 


Come on.... how the hell ca anyone say what that is? Could be anything.... could be another planet for all we know....

Or it could be a Mothership refuelling and on its way to Earth as described in the Ancient texts of the Mayan!!



That's how Destiny on Stargate Universe recharged herself... very plausible theory. Damn I miss that show!!!
edit on 4-12-2011 by shushu because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Illustronic
There's two trains of thoughts here, one is the pragmatic based observational dissection of equipment involved in providing the sensory data (the images) and some orbital dynamics basic background knowledge that leads to the determination that said body cannot be in close proximity of the Planet Mercury and appear that size without perturbing the orbit of Mercury which could easily be calculated, or its a reactive imaging anomaly.

Or...
Well put!
I agree.
At least until I have finished with my own theory, which by the way will be earth shaking and definitive. Presented as the absolute truth (at least to me) and unable to be disqualified by anyone. Especially people who actually know something about space science.


P.S. I'm watching this guy on TV right now! Coincidence? I think not!



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by jonnywhite
 


Aliens in my toilet?
Sure, after I toss the toilet paper in.

www.geekalerts.com...


Something happened with my toilet on Thanksgiving Day a month before the December 26th Tsunami... which I still believe was a 'heads up' warning sign.
edit on 4-12-2011 by shushu because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Vandalour
 

You do know that the majority of our planets have an invisible protective layer, right? Once the sun's rays hit a planet, the invisible layer can be seen by the average onlooker.

Look up: Magnetic Field
edit on 12/4/2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by MolochMarduk
 

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Light reflecting inside the telescope optics, and diffracting off edges within the telescopes, can produce some interesting effects. Consider this series of images showing the planet Venus leaving the field of view of the HI1-B telescope between Janary 26-31, 2009. As Venus approaches the edge of the field-of-view, a ring shape is seen apparently coming out of the planet. This is caused by reflections of the bright planet off of the camera barrel. (If you look closely at the full-field version of the January 26, 2009 image above, you'll see a large, faint bubble on the left side of the image, which is also an internal reflection of Venus.) The ring grows progressively larger as time goes by. On January 31, a horizontal streak appears near the position where Venus disappeared. This latter effect is caused by diffraction off of the optical baffles


Venus leaving field-of-view January 27, 2009. Ring caused by reflection off of camera surfaces.
more information here
sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil...



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 09:53 AM
link   
reply to post by poet1b
 

The CME (not a solar flare) did not hit Mercury.

And just so Jupiter won't feel left out.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:01 AM
link   
reply to post by laymanskeptic
 


You are quite right.
But when zooming and shooting at the same time, these things happen.
There is no ques in my mind that, there is a huge artificial object or 2 there.
Nice find op. Quite undebunkable.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:12 AM
link   
I am sooo glad I stayed away from this one.

And why do so many people think lens flares hit planets??



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:12 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
reply to post by RickyVelveeta
 


Full of knowledge is better than full of hot air.


both of the above combined with an air of assumed authority is miles worse i think. i'd rather take regular plain old hot air over hot air that's flat-out disguised as truth.

phage mate, i know you don't care about me or me hot air and that's fine; i don't have an agenda or anything here and am prepared to eat my words in future instances should you be right on the money; i just don't believe that's the case for the majority of the interesting/valid topics you have seemingly dedicated your life to killing stone dead and closing for discussion. simply being the first to show up with the loudest voice and announcing something is a hoax or lens flare etc does not make it a hoax or lens flare.

in this particular instance, the theory you presented is simply incorrect. i am glad others have noticed too and seen past the condescending loudmouthing; and we can resume discussion.

back on topic.... i normally hate the 'youtube guys', they can often be completely insane; but there is very little doubt that the shape on the video has cylindrical/unnatural features of some sort.

if nobody has posted the ringmakers stuff yet, here's a little tidbit. first youtube result so disregard the dumb music etc, but skip to 2.34 for the legit hubble pics. someone said somewhere the longest one was estimated to be like 22,500 miles long!

www.youtube.com...

regardless of the outlandish theories regarding the actual 'ringmaking', this is IMO an instance of an undeniable huge object next to a planet showing up on telescope. not jumping to any conclusions with 'motherships' or anything, but so far this has not been fully explained. the idea of a manufactured spacecraft that size and what secrets it could hold is just mind boggling to me.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:25 AM
link   
Make up your mind you all... What is it.???



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I looked at the link. That photo doesn't really look much like the OP video at all. In the op video you see a localized source of light fade in and out. In the picture you provided a whole band of the picture goes dark.



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:46 AM
link   
The only thing that gives me doubt over this is that the object isnt moving beyond Mercury, if it was a ship what the hell are they doing sat watching Mercury, all the cool kids are on Earth!

What I would love to know is has Phage ever seen something he cant explain? Now that would be something awesome!



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 10:57 AM
link   
To the right of mercury, but left of the object in question is a dark spot. Why doesn't that dark spot light up like the rest of the area around Mercury? Could it be that Mercury's magnetic field is bouncing flare particles back the way they came causing them to collide with other oncoming particles, thus producing this effect?



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
It looks like Chinese Lanterns......


Go find, I honestly wonder how big a object like that would be....



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
I don’t know whats there… but something is really there… we can obviously see that the cme hit’s something …. And it shines like the planet does… to the guys that are trying to explain that thing is normal… with other images…they are losing their credibility… because there is something there…. What it is ? that’s the only question!!



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 11:16 AM
link   
reply to post by renegadeloser
 

Yes, I know that. But you also see a dark area between the "UFO" and Mercury. That is what I was pointing out.
As explained here the images used in the "decloak" animation are heavily processed, which introduces artifacts. Both the dark area and the bright area are products of that processing.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Here is an image which shows the effect happening with Jupiter and Mercury at the same time. A CME cannot have any effect on both planets at the same time but imaging processing can. Notice the dark area (the result of background subtraction) near each planet. Notice that the "UFO" is always at the edge of the dark area opposite the planet. It occurs the same way every time in the "tbh1" images. It does not occur in images which are processed differently. It is not real. It is an image processing artifact.


ATS will not allow an animation to be uploaded (too large) if you want to see an animation of the above you can do so here:
secchi.nrl.navy.mil...
You will see the "decloak" occur at both planets at the same time. If you do a little searching you will see that it occurs regularly.

edit on 12/4/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 11:26 AM
link   
Here's Norman Bergrun's 'Ringmakers Of Saturn' pdf if anyones interested...

www....(nolink)/?7v9wroerjraoa82



posted on Dec, 4 2011 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by Droogie
I doubt that any of you has got any idea of what we're looking at. That's why you shouldn't jump to any conclusions whatsoever, because there are people around here that are very knowledgable regarding YT videos such as this.

I've seen a number of them explained in prosaic terms, and I'm sure this is one of them. Stupid people such as us, who don't know the we're looking at, shouldn't jump the gun by being convinced this is a UFO as big as mercury. Because, although we realize we're idiots, we don't believe this is necessarily a UFO.


Exactly. I LOL when I see posts like this and everyone jumps on board. A 2500km UFO parked next to Mercury. Tooooootally plausible. Please.

Mercury has a magnetic field. Maybe it's magnetic focusing of the CME? How about you brainiacs come up with some believable arguments and try to remember that all the scifi movies you watch are FICTION.




top topics



 
107
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join