Originally posted by Sly1one
Originally posted by Nikkithegreat
i would like to start with stating that i don't blame you for what your thinking BUT id like to shine light on just a few overlooked points. Firstly,
it seems to me that you came up with an idea, and went and researched on points defending your idea and completely ignoring facts that could
potentially harm it. This is what i call pseudo science. Turning a blind eye to information that could potentially render your idea useless does not
mean its not there it just means your betting on the chance of there being alot of lazy people looking for ANY answer no matter how nonsensical it may
be to believe in. Luckily for you most of that population are members of this site. You have fallen in a trap of a new world religion which has been
branded packaged and sold to you whether you believe it or not. AND trust me TPTB want you to believe just this, which is why they call it a new world
"religion" ..you are not the first or the last to believe in a theory such as this. But im sorry to tell you, you have traded one form of bondage
for another and there is no reason why anyone should take this seriously.
I am willing to hear you out and consider your point if but you would actually explain to me or show me the evidence I apparently "intentionally
overlooked" ??? I didn't see it in your post so maybe you can enlighten me further?
Also, as far as the "new age doctrine" goes I've heard this a few times from several posters who quite frankly I think have been so inundated with
a fear of ANYTHING NEW because of the rampant NWO fear that is making people fly off the hinge at anything even hinting at "new world order" this
isn't going to keep you safe by the way...
I don't agree with a "new world order", I don't believe in man made ideas of control, authority, and power and a restructuring of government I am
well aware of those intentions my ideas are not from propaganda and I didn't fall victim to the "new age" hype people seem to constantly be
referring, you again are not enlightening me to anything new that I am not already well aware of and constantly mindful of...
Having said all this, my thread was about observations that I MADE on my own in my own life through my own experience, the parallels were of my OWN
realization and only used well known concepts of function/form to facilitate my OPINION about this "topic"...
Having said all that how in sam hell can anyone here even begin to make a valid argument against living with earth in harmony and in balance with the
principals of nature that made us all possible? How could someone form any decent counter-argument that could come anywhere near legitimate and NOT
I am referencing only the processes by which everything was created/exists/and persists, the processes that made all life we know of so far even
possible which was here long long before you and I were able to form "opinions"...Any other reference to "god" or "religion" or "new world
order" or whatever the hell is strictly coming from peoples desire to interpret this information through those goggles...
So I'll ask you like I asked others...where/how/what are these facts I am apparently missing that "destroy" the notion that earth is alive?
First of all you say that this idea has in no way been planted into you whatsoever, its what you came up with alll by yourself. Wrong. I don`t even
blame you for thinking this but let me explain. MOST of the time, when you go about your hectic daily routine of life your SUBCONSCIOUS mind is
active. This means, symbols, conversations, trigger words, ideas, pictures, even beliefs are entering your brain with no awareness and no filter.
Enough said but just for fun, lets go further. This gaia earth being alive idea is in no way new and i grantee you have heard if from somewhere else
before. You might agree with the ideas but this alone in combination with your unaware subconscious can completely hijack what you believe to be
reality and also what you believe to be YOUR thoughts and not the idea of others.
Secondly, you wanted proof that you were missing that i didnt enlighten you with. Great questions and i will provide you with that.
is earth alive?
the earth does not make itself grow. it get bigger over time due to "cosmic dust" and meteors that fall on it, but it does not make itself bigger
The earth does not consume energy. If there was NOTHING living on earth, the earth would GIVE OFF energy, not consume energy.
The earth does not move itself around. The earth moves through space because of gravitational fields which in turn define ORBITS. The earth cannot
choose where it wants to go.
The earth does not reproduce itself. there is no "Mama earth" and "Papa earth". There are no "baby earths".
These are some of the qualities that define what is "alive" and what is "not alive":
Living things consume energy. That energy is used to grow, reproduce, and move.
Living things move around. Even plants "move" in response to sunlight or moisture.
Living thing grow.
Living things reproduce themselves. They make "babies", be that as an egg or as a baby animal, or as a seed or spore.
ALL of these must be present for something to be considered alive. Rocks STORE energy, but do not USE energy. rocks do not eat. Rocks do not move by
themselves. Rocks do not make "baby rocks"
The earth is made of rock. Rock is not alive. the Earth is not alive.
MANY living things live on earth, but the earth itself is NOT alive.