It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Attack on UK embassy in Iran 'had support of the state'

page: 2
16
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by boymonkey74

Attack on UK embassy in Iran 'had support of the state'


www.bbc.co.uk

The ruling regime in Iran are likely to have supported an attack on the UK's embassy in Tehran, the British ambassador to the country has said
(visit the link for the full news article)



The Iranian, Ahmadinejad is a well known Freemason. He would do anything to further the agenda of the New World Order. The attack on the embassy may have been supported by the state, but those things happen all the time, so it comes to me as no surprise.




posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by boymonkey74
 


Hello and theres me thinking it might be part of the occupy movement. I calll progoganda on this one.. They moved the protesters off. No hostages were taken and no one was hurt..

Raid on the British Embassy in Iran Raid Was Merely an Occupy Protest
www.abovetopsecret.com...

hey are not intersted in talk and compormise, because they just want to control the oil in Iran and install a central bank. Same script as Libya, Iraq...etc


edit on 2-12-2011 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 



made me giggle that one

Yeah and some students had a laugh and stormed the embassy, Do I think we have over reacted ...Hell Yes
But My Goverment seems to want to escalate this in to War

edit on 2-12-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by purplemer
hey are not intersted in talk and compormise, because they just want to control the oil in Iran and install a central bank. Same script as Libya, Iraq...etc


Same old line getting trotted out...

This embassy thing would never be used as a prelude to war and anyone thinking so is daft and paranoid. " Normal" relations are likely to be resumed in the near future once this has blown over. Might take a year or two, but the Embassy will re-open and there will be no War, at least not over this.

If this was about Oil, why would a lot of the sanctions over the years be against Oil assets? Iran sells most of it's oil to China, apparently.

Central bank? The Iranians have one already which operates almost exactly like every other Central Bank, aisde from it using Islamic Banking principles (which when you look under the hood aren't actually any different aside from them calling interest charges, "fees")..

Libya about Oil? Nope, wrong again. We already had "control" of their Oil prior to the rebellion and, with the NTC now in charge, previous contracts are going to be renegociated, so there is no guarantee we'll even get the contracts, much less on more favourable terms.

I also don't think Iraq was about Oil either. It seems it is mostly a case of using the prevaling fear at the time to take advantage of a situation to get rid of someone who's been a royal pain in the arse. Yes, it was mis-sold to us as "WMD", but we don't seem to have benefitted from any Oil money either. The sheer cost of the War outstrips any profit to be made by a wide margin, meaning it would take decades to get our cash back.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
It's also worth remembering, before people bang on about "the west" wanting Oil or whatever, that it was Irans Parliament who voted to downgrade relations with us prior to this Embassy attack. Probably because the IAEA has found them to up to something fishy. Maybe if they came clean about what they are doing, we might not be so quick to slap sanctions on them...

Bottom line is, if they want a Bomb, leave the NPT, but be prepared for the fallout, pardon the pun. If they don't want a bomb, they need to stop obfuscating and come clean about their full activities. At the moment, they are not and are hiding things, which is the whole reason for the sanctions.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 07:28 PM
link   
reply to post by stumason
 


Hey..
The easiest way to control the oil is by controlling the money. You control the money by installing the central bank. Funny that the rebels in libya were given a central bank within a week of them starting there war. Very telling that is..

It is not the same old lines.. Its the way it is. This is about world domination of energy and money. Look at the countries that were listed on the axis of evil. Same list of countries that never had Rockefeller central bank..

Once they own the central banks. Then they truly own the oil. It is only a matter of time then before they own the government..

This movement is known as the NWO and it is aim is world domination.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 08:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 01:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Seems to me it's all just getting worse

Take note he say's it is "likely" so he has no proof, I dunno about this maybe My Goverment are just making it up to drum up support for future military action.
I for one will march for peace (Like I did with the Iraq war) I always think there are other options than war. Like talking and compromise.

www.bbc.co.uk

This bit interested me also..
The move followed a report by the UN's nuclear watchdog that said Iran had carried out tests "relevant to the development of a nuclear device" ....anyone else heard about this test?
edit on 2-12-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)


I am afraid you are a bit naive. Israel will be in total trouble if Iran gets hold of nuclear capability. Iran is more powerful than you think. I hate war, but I think this current very measured response by Israel is the right thing to do. In Iranian culture they still have honour killings (even carried out in the UK). I cannot trust these kind of people.

The world is not a gentle place. It is savage. Trendy peace protesting is not going to work. Like in all other walks of life if you do not stand your ground you get walked all over.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 01:35 AM
link   
Makes me wonder how all the ATSers missed the obvious fact that the attack on UK Embassy would be totally counterproductive for the state of Iran and Iranian people. However, in order to sway public opinion which previously was almost equally divided on the subject of whether or not declare a war on a Iran that was a brilliant move. That makes it a MOSSAD operation with 98% certainty. Sounds' like something I might have planned given the task of discrediting Iran in public opinion. Can't be proved, of course.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   
Of course it was supported by the state the UK just sanctioned the hell out of Iran. Why wouldn't the people be angry,.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 03:31 AM
link   
Of course they did.

But the "they" im talking about is the UK leaders.

They can't just come out and say "Ello good chaps, you all have to come home because War could breakout any minute!"

Instead they help plan this event, make sure that there are a couple UK flags burnt, and that way they can tell their people to come home without setting off major flags that war is coming.

Right?
edit on 3-12-2011 by dannotz because: clarify



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 04:06 AM
link   
what do you think. the iranians are going to fire on their own people to save the u.k. embassy.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 04:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheJazuma
The Iranian, Ahmadinejad is a well known Freemason. He would do anything to further the agenda of the New World Order.

I don't understand, if Ahmadinajad is a freemason, why is he so anti-US and Israel? or is he just pretending to be?



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 05:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Revolution9

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Seems to me it's all just getting worse

Take note he say's it is "likely" so he has no proof, I dunno about this maybe My Goverment are just making it up to drum up support for future military action.
I for one will march for peace (Like I did with the Iraq war) I always think there are other options than war. Like talking and compromise.

www.bbc.co.uk

This bit interested me also..
The move followed a report by the UN's nuclear watchdog that said Iran had carried out tests "relevant to the development of a nuclear device" ....anyone else heard about this test?
edit on 2-12-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)


I am afraid you are a bit naive. Israel will be in total trouble if Iran gets hold of nuclear capability. Iran is more powerful than you think. I hate war, but I think this current very measured response by Israel is the right thing to do. In Iranian culture they still have honour killings (even carried out in the UK). I cannot trust these kind of people.

The world is not a gentle place. It is savage. Trendy peace protesting is not going to work. Like in all other walks of life if you do not stand your ground you get walked all over.
You cannot trust Iranians 'who have honour killings'?Yet you trust Israel who have state sponsored assassins?Is that not a form of honour killing?
edit on 3/12/2011 by ClanDonnachaidh because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 01:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by GLaDOS

Originally posted by TheJazuma
The Iranian, Ahmadinejad is a well known Freemason. He would do anything to further the agenda of the New World Order.

I don't understand, if Ahmadinajad is a freemason, why is he so anti-US and Israel? or is he just pretending to be?

There it is; point, game, set, match, inning.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by WillowToad

Originally posted by GLaDOS

Originally posted by TheJazuma
The Iranian, Ahmadinejad is a well known Freemason. He would do anything to further the agenda of the New World Order.

I don't understand, if Ahmadinajad is a freemason, why is he so anti-US and Israel? or is he just pretending to be?

There it is; point, game, set, match, inning.

Please say in clear English, not very good with saying like these as English is not my mother tongue.




top topics



 
16
<< 1   >>

log in

join