posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 10:45 AM
Well, I just don't know. Everyone's brings up very good points about it. Until Mr. Latvala provides the key and it is verified all we can do is
speculate, believe and/or bash him. I tend to be more of a "well maybe" kind of guy so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for the time being.
I am particularly keen on his use of the words "sonic waves and vocal syllables". I like that.
One thing i never got past in the last thread was the perfect match of the Milky Way Galaxy from a top view point many years before the telescope was
invented. (Bacon was an optics pioneer and occultist). Was it channelled, passed down from previous civilizations, perhaps a space faring one or
Maybe the image they are referring to is Yale image number 1006152 as some others have brought up? Seems to be the only thing close.
I do find it strange that none of the other cryptographers would comment too as another poster said. What did they do call to say hello, hows it going
Several top cryptographers contacted by FoxNews.com declined to comment on Latvala's claim, willing neither to validate his interpretation nor
offer a counter explanation for the strange book.
Seems they would have something
to say no?
It could be a publicity stunt to get more people cracking on it, seems to be working here. But then again why not just put up some kind of cash prize
or consideration for recruitment into an intelligence agency like some of the other cryptography puzzles, (some are located here on ATS too). Though
if one were to crack this they would be contacting you anyway.
Wanted to add, some of us came to the conclusion that it was a "cookbook" of sorts too in the last thread. What were they cooking, well we'll let you
draw your own conclusions.
There are many news feeds publishing the article now, not just FoxNews. It is getting some attention that's for sure.
Here's a picture of Mr. Voynich I found on one of the articles. Just though I would include it seeing that he's quite famous around this neck of the
edit on 3-12-2011 by timewalker because: (no reason given)