The List of Banks Receiving a 16 trillion dollar bailout., page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times

Topic started on 2-12-2011 @ 10:58 AM by camaro68ss

Here is the list of Banks that received a bailout back in 08 and how much each got

Citigroup - $2.513 trillion
Morgan Stanley - $2.041 trillion
Merrill Lynch - $1.949 trillion
Bank of America - $1.344 trillion
Barclays PLC - $868 billion
Bear Sterns - $853 billion
Goldman Sachs - $814 billion
Royal Bank of Scotland - $541 billion
JP Morgan Chase - $391 billion
Deutsche Bank - $354 billion
UBS - $287 billion
Credit Suisse - $262 billion
Lehman Brothers - $183 billion
Bank of Scotland - $181 billion
BNP Paribas - $175 billion
Wells Fargo - $159 billion
Dexia - $159 billion
Wachovia - $142 billion
Dresdner Bank - $135 billion
Societe Generale - $124 billion
"All Other Borrowers" - $2.639 trillion

theeconomiccollapseblog.com... s

Thats 16 Trillion worth! if the 16 Trillion was passed out to every tax payer in america you would get over $140,000 each!!!!

Now the banks that are to big to fail are even bigger now!!!! Where are the Republicans and Democrats on this? why no up roar???? Does anyone care?

If we can get enough people to wake up, maybe way can got people voted in who care and want to END THE FED!

edit on 2-12-2011 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:06 AM by satron

I think a lot of the country's hopes lay in Libertarianism, and by default, RP. But I'm leery about waiting to see if he get's elected. Seem's like big action is needed NOW.

edit on 2-12-2011 by satron because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:11 AM by jimmyx

it's not that no one cares...it's what can you do about it. these transactions were done by the FED in the U.S. and the ECB in Europe. this was private lending with a "guarentee" backed by soveriegn debt. the voters (peons) have no recourse in these matters. representative governments no longer control capital or the movement of it.
the massive economic force that can be applied by disgruntled capital can, and has had, devastating affects on societies around the world. capital knows this, and that's why they don't care what you or i think about it.

edit on 2-12-2011 by jimmyx because: syntex

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:35 AM by hp1229

reply to post by camaro68ss

Just amazing.

How the hell are we even suppose to ammortize any of it even if we wanted to over the next say 50 years?

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:40 AM by Jason88

reply to post by camaro68ss

Disgusting. Too big to fail? Right... see you later free markets in corporatist America. These bankers are greedy psychopaths.

Question: "All Other Borrowers - $2.639 trillion" - are these banks too? And which ones because that's a boat load of money there for a throwaway line such as that.

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:41 AM by svetlana84

Just imagine for a moment the 140'000 per taxpayer would really be paid directly to the taxpayer.
Everyone could afford health insurance/ social security for life. Most people would put a large amount of their money to their bank accounts, so the banks would profit as well, no bailout needed.

And at the same time it would be a huge boost for the economy since everybody would get out and buy that new flat, the new car, pay back the student loans, fix their house and so on and so on.

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:45 AM by camaro68ss

Originally posted by svetlana84
Just imagine for a moment the 140'000 per taxpayer would really be paid directly to the taxpayer.
Everyone could afford health insurance/ social security for life. Most people would put a large amount of their money to their bank accounts, so the banks would profit as well, no bailout needed.

And at the same time it would be a huge boost for the economy since everybody would get out and buy that new flat, the new car, pay back the student loans, fix their house and so on and so on.

I was just making a point that if passed out to tax payers, each would get $140,000. in reality we could not do that because it would instantly increase the money supply by 700%. Making all goods and services cost 7 times more than they do now.

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:48 AM by jimmyx

Originally posted by svetlana84
Just imagine for a moment the 140'000 per taxpayer would really be paid directly to the taxpayer.
Everyone could afford health insurance/ social security for life. Most people would put a large amount of their money to their bank accounts, so the banks would profit as well, no bailout needed.

And at the same time it would be a huge boost for the economy since everybody would get out and buy that new flat, the new car, pay back the student loans, fix their house and so on and so on.

and that will happen when hell freezes over...besides, can you imagine the push-back using the whole communist/ socialist arguements that capitalists would use? remember, capitalists have money to make accidents happen.

reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 11:51 AM by apacheman

reply to post by svetlana84

Ahh, but then those undeserving people would be getting a fat government handout, and it would corrupt their will to work, right? It it would probably addict them to more and bigger handouts, right?

Banksters, on the other hand, deserve that support since they and they alone stand between us and fiscal apocalypse, working hard every minute of every day to prevent it. And they are above getting addicted to anything, no sir, just once, and nevermore, right?

Besides, giving the people unearned money, pfff, they would just waste it on paying their bills and buying frivolous necessities, instead of spending it wisely on yachts, art, jewelry, and parties to influence lawmakers.

Sheesh, some people simply don't get it.

Pages: ^^TOP^^