It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
How oold is earth,
6 day creation = 6000 years. Genealogies from Adam to Jesus also confirm this.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
Genetic evidence indicates we all come from just two people (Adam and Eve).
Rubbish. The human race can be traced back to only one dark skinned female from 200,000 years ago and at some point the human race almost died out and all on earth is now can be traced back to about 2000 Kalahri bushman and the reason for it is that the gene can only be tracked through females.
science.howstuffworks.com...
They call her eve but make no mistake they're only using the biblical name not backing up the bible.
Why do creationists have to lie?edit on 4-12-2011 by steveknows because: Typo
So how did they determine the 200,000 years ago date? And how is it possible that the human race can come from a female without the seed of a man?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by steveknows
But wait you said "the human race can be traced back to one dark skinned female" but suddenly now your changing your mind and saying there were thousands of men and women... How does that make sense? And there was nothing wrong with incest before leviticus. Also evolution is silly and I'm not going to debate you with that here, but I see how your trying to derail the thread.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
How oold is earth,
6 day creation = 6000 years. Genealogies from Adam to Jesus also confirm this.
So the Venus of Willendorf was floating around in space for 20,000 years before finding it's way to earth? That's gotta be the explanation, right? That particular Venus was dated at around 24,000 BC. Unless you don't believe in archeology, but that can't be, because you use it to back YOUR claims of the "bible's literal truths" all the time. Maybe you don't believe in the science of dating the stone. No. That can't be it. You talk about the "science" of DNA, something more complex than carbon-dating, and so if they get DNA right, then by default the dating of the Venus must be spot on. Right?
And I'm going to need non-Creationist sources for your "everybody from two folks" claim.
You understand my need for non-biased science, right?
Still waiting on an answer to who Cain's wife was as well.
edit on 4-12-2011 by Garkiniss because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
And I decline to answer your question about cains wife. Not because I haven't got an answer, but because skeptics of the Bible have used Cain's wife time and again to discredit the book of Genesis as a true historical record. its pretty sad if that's the only thing you have, I'm not going to cast pearls before swine and fall for your venus fly trap.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
To add. The Venus of Willendorf isn't the only statue or thing on the Earth predating 6000 years.
There are cave paintings, as well as other bits of art, and I don't think God created multi=million year old dinosaur bone-shaped rocks just for the sake of sticking them in the ground for people to dig up like a mystery/prank.
By the way, I am an ex-Christian Agnostic. But my wife is a Christian, however she has spent much time digging into questions and doubts she's had and we often talk about those topics.
#1: Have those you who are believers ever done research into the origin of the word hell? You may be surprised by what you find, assuming you're willing to go outside your comfort zone. Let's just say that it's actually an uplifting subject.
#2: If all humans descended from Adam and Eve, why aren't humans affected by the same substantial genetic problems that are present as a result of inbreeding?
#3: With regard to the concept of a 6000 year old Earth, why buy into that? The Bible doesn't explicitly state an age for the planet. Wouldn't you rather worship a God who created the universe in such a way that everything science has learned was made that way on purpose, rather than sticking to the extremely narrow and limited scope of knowledge laid out in the Bible? Certainly, given God's immense intelligence and transcendence, not everything was included in the Bible and the other books left out when the cannon was assembled. Why assume that just because it is not written in the Bible then it is not possible?
Originally posted by Snappahead
I have to admit I haven't read all of this thread, so apologies if this has already been addressed.
I wanted to share something that I heard years ago and throw it out there for consideration. I have never actually researched to see if this is true, because I really don't care for religion enough to bother, but anyway, here goes.
The original language (I am sure someone on here will know what it is) of the text that describes the "virgin birth" of Jesus was not necessarily translated correctly. The idea is that the word translated as virgin in subsequent texts, actually means "a mother for the first time" rather than a woman who has never had sex in the language of the original. Close, but slightly different.
Apologies for not having any evidence to back this up - just wanted to inject the idea into this thread as it seems there's been some fairly vigorous debate, and a good debate never suffered from having some more fuel for the fire.