Originally posted by isthisreallife
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Yeah but with numbers that high -- there is a strong chance that the veto will be null and void with an override back in Congress. Tis scary but there is still hope that during reconciliation of the two bills -- from each respective House -- that the language is neutered or removed; wishful thinking is night time trait of mine.
I was saying the same thing. I believe that Obama could use a nullified veto to his advantage later on in the campaign trail. That is why he would veto it, not necessarily because he disagrees with it.
If you're wishful thinking I can't blame you. I was just hoping the MSM would pick it up and run with it....
I gathered that was what you were saying -- just wanted to also concur I suppose. Sadly and yes it is sad that I believe the president -- just as other presidents have done -- will use this for political purposes and has no care of what the language actually entails.
This is a classic example of the "right hand doing something left hand has no clue of". Departments within the Executive are heralding this type of "enforcement and authority" while the White House says it is bad. It is all of course a political game and all for show.
