It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

'US used nukes on Iraq, Afghanistan'

page: 8
19
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


this isnt believable at all, im sorry. china and russia wouldve been all over this, you cant just use a nuke and expect no one to know about it. think about it, its a #ing nuke...this wouldve been global news and ww3 would have already started.




posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by wamboy123
reply to post by purplemer
 


this isnt believable at all, im sorry. china and russia wouldve been all over this, you cant just use a nuke and expect no one to know about it. think about it, its a #ing nuke...this wouldve been global news and ww3 would have already started.


Thank you for your reply.
I thought 911 being an inside job was unbelievable when I read it. But in the course of time changed my mind.. So all I am asking you to do is look at the facts for yourself before making you mind up. The most important aspect being that The Uranium Medical Research Centre (UMRC) has been motoring high levels of non depleted uranium in residents of Afghanistan and no one can explain were the non depleted uranium has come from....
It is the smoking gun of a nuke.. and nobody sofar has debunked it on this site..

Here is a link to the scientific abstract..
www.umrc.net...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 





I'm willing to wager their perverted version of Sharia law will kill way more people than DU



Hey how you.. I am not talking about the use of DU.. It used as a matter of course and wrong, but that is a different issue. I am referring to Non Depleted Uranium being found in the residents of Afganistan. The Uranium Medical Research Centre (UMRC) has released a paper about it and non depleted uranium is a smoking gun of a nuke...

I am just asking people to look at the evidence before flaming please...




Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


globalresearch.ca...

Abstract of the paper can be found here..
www.umrc.net...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:22 AM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 





why do you keep posting articles (which don't even look too credible) mentioning DU, whereas the title of the thread is an actual nuke? It's a different ballpark.


I am not posting articles about DU. I am referring to Non Depleted Uranium being found in high levels in the residents of Afghanistan.




Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


www.globalresearch.ca...

This inforamtion has been released in a paper by the Uranium Medical Research Centre....



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:30 AM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 



This inforamtion has been released in a paper by the Uranium Medical Research Centre....


Then link to the paper by UMRC, not a blog that is using the report for its own ends.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:44 AM
link   
If depleted uranium counts as a "tactical nuke" then yes.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by buddhasystem
 





why do you keep posting articles (which don't even look too credible) mentioning DU, whereas the title of the thread is an actual nuke? It's a different ballpark.


I am not posting articles about DU. I am referring to Non Depleted Uranium being found in high levels in the residents of Afghanistan.




Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


www.globalresearch.ca...

This inforamtion has been released in a paper by the Uranium Medical Research Centre....



Yes, you are posting, but you're also suggesting that it was at the hands of US nuclear bombs... A pretty big accusation like this needs a more credible source IMO...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:18 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 





Then link to the paper by UMRC, not a blog that is using the report for its own ends.


You could have used the google button to find it or looked at some of my other links of the thread that link to it...Anyways here is a link and an extract..




The mean concentration of uranium in eight samples is found to be considerably greater (273.05 ng/L, SD 136.81, SE 48.37) than what is regarded as a normal population (1-20 ng/L). The 238U: 235U ratio is 137.87 ± 0.20, which is consistent with natural uranium. The 234U: 238U ratio for the Afghan samples is 0.000055 ± 0.000001, also consistent with natural uranium (NU). 236U, which usually forms a component of depleted uranium, was not detected (measured 236U: 238U < 10 -7 ). Five of the eight male subjects from Nangahar Province have urine samples with 238U: 235U and 234U: 238U ratios consistent with natural uranium (NU) with values of 137.86 ± 0.25 and 0.000055 ± 0.000001 respectively. 236U was not detected (measured 236U: 238U < 10 -7 ). The five samples, repeatedly analyzed in 3-4 series, have a mean concentration of uranium of 315.37 ± 65.09 ng/L that is considerably greater than normal values of 1-20 ng/L


www.umrc.net...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:20 AM
link   
dp/

edit on 2-12-2011 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by GLaDOS
If depleted uranium counts as a "tactical nuke" then yes.


I am talking about non depleted uranium...




Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


globalresearch.ca...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by wamboy123
reply to post by purplemer
 


this isnt believable at all, im sorry. china and russia wouldve been all over this, you cant just use a nuke and expect no one to know about it. think about it, its a #ing nuke...this wouldve been global news and ww3 would have already started.


Picked up in Europe... Soz I cannot crop image from were I am..



edit on 2-12-2011 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Soshh
 





One can't expect websites with such a clear agenda to be entirely objective and accurate, but the above statement is incredibly misleading if not utterly false.


Thank you for your reply. All information has an agenda. It is created for a purpose. Anyway to pull me back on topic.. I want to talk about the non depleted uranium that was found...



Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


globalresearch.ca...

With papers written by the Uranium Medical Research Centre...

www.umrc.net...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


I did check the site, that's why I asked you why you were citing a political blog rather than the original research. They are talking about natural uranium, not nuclear or DPU weapons. It is apparently an environmental hazard.
edit on 2-12-2011 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:40 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


Ofc it is on a political site. Your not going to find this info on granny weekly or fox news....

I have sighted you both. The paper and conference that took place have been linked several times on here and what it says in regards to the uranium consequence of exposure could due to deployment of weapons..

You could try doing a little detective work yourself instead of negating...
edit on 2-12-2011 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Radiation from depleted uranium ammunition is much more deadly than radiation from a few nukes. Talk about war crimes...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 10:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 


Interesting to hear no the less. But there are plenty of 'dirty bombs' that aren't even nuclear these days. I still highly doubt any were used, and I am sure you'd agree.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:04 AM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


Sorry man your sources suck, and your first source sources your second source.
All in all it is one man's opinion and I cannot find any proof in this entire thread that could convince me.

Btw, tac nukes would leave a much bigger signature.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by palg1
 


I got other sources too. I am not saying it or didnt happen I am just asking peeps to look at all the facts and to try and work it out without just flaming..






Radiological measurements of the uranium concentrations in Afghan civilians’ urine samples indicate abnormally high levels of non-depleted uranium. Radiological measurements of Afghan civilians’ have high concentrations of uranium in a range beginning at 4 X’s and reaching to over 20 X’s normal populations. This is 400% to 2000% higher than the study controls and normal population baselines of the concentrations of nanograms of uranium per liter of urine in a 24-hour sample. UMRC has completed initial but still preliminary studies that corroborate these finding in biological controls and geological samples taken in Operation Enduring Freedom bombsites.


www.globalresearch.ca...

Baed on papers from The Uranium Medical Research Centre (UMRC)...

www.umrc.net...

kind regards

purp...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:18 AM
link   
Do you really think that the Russians and Chinese would have allowed the use of tactical nukes?




posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Submarines
Do you really think that the Russians and Chinese would have allowed the use of tactical nukes?



IDK really what they would allow. The said nothing about the flase flag operation of 911. Or the two illegal wars in the middle east...

So who knows...







 
19
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join