'US used nukes on Iraq, Afghanistan', page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:07 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
From Peter Eyre's blog page:

With the compliments of the United States of America they have developed one of the most lucrative exports in the world…….that of military weapons and hardware. They have blasted Afghanistan with nuclear weapons since the start of the war and continue to do so.


followed by:

Finally to put things into perspective the west has released into the atmosphere, up to the current time (and continue to do so), the global catastrophic impact of radiation equivalent to hundreds of thousands of Nagasaki bombs. This radiation has been released into the atmosphere from depleted uranium weapons in the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Lebanon and Gaza with additional possible usage of 4th generation nuclear weapons in Lebanon and Gaza.


How much "radiation" is actually released by DU?? well for starters DU is primarily an emitter of Alpha radiation - this stuff is stopped by paper, your skin, or a few centimeters of air. Alpha radiationis actually a particle the size of a Helium 4 nucleus - 2 neutrons and 2 protons - an Alpha Particle- quiet a large particle in radiation terms.

These are extremely energetic, and becomes a problem if ingested and lodged inside organs - then the particles can do considerable damage in their immediate area. Fortunately DU is actually a very weak emitter - with a "half life" of its components measured in billions and hundreds of millions of years.

Uranium in the body has a half life of about 15 days - ie we excrete half of it every 2 weeks or so - so it diesn't emit a great deal of radiation in that short time....but what it does emit is extremely dangerous.

compare with the Polonium 210 that was used to kill that Russian chap in the UK a couple of eyars ago - with a half life of about 140 days it is massively more dangerous than DU - it releases many more particles in any given time period - 4 thousand times more than Radon 226 for example, with a HL of 1600 years.

so handling DU is no great problem at all - not even as a toxic heavy metal.

But if you are in an area where it has been used to attack armoured vehicles then there is a fairly good chance there will be some of it (or a lot of it) vapourised or broken down into dust, which can then be easily inhaled. And then you stand to get a double whammy - it is a toxic heavy metal when ingested, plus the alpha radiation can do a lot of harm.

apparently this DU is what Eyre and others are refering as a "nuclear weapon", and I wonder if it is what he is refering to in this "new" accusation - trying to sensationalise it up for sales??

Personally I think it is extremely dishonest "reporting" - as bad as any disinfo you think the MSM may be putting out.

DU is certainly a health hazard when reduced to dust or vapour - but it is about as "nuclear" as concrete!

AFAIK DU is used for armour piercing penetrators.

I'm sure the Taliban had some tanks that were KO'ed by such weapons - anyone got any idea how many? Were A-10's used in Afghanistan, or any of hte land combat systems that use DU - M1 MBT's, Bradleys, etc?



reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:08 PM by boymonkey74
reply to post by xavi1000



Sorry fella If that was a nuke Iam the Queen of England.....
The camera crew would have been toast.
Looks like a big explosion Yes but no way a nuke.
This is the smallest nuke I can find and it looks nothing like your explosion
www.youtube.com...
edit on 1-12-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:12 PM by xavi1000
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul



Ok ..sorry ...but it looks like a nuke for me at first view
edit on 1-12-2011 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:15 PM by boymonkey74
reply to post by xavi1000


LOL ok just check my last post and look at the Davy Crockett Battlefield Nuke


reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:18 PM by ignant
www.naturalnews.com...

"Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear Weapons"

Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...

looks like US has found something worse than Nukes and has been using them on Iraq and Afghanistan

all the while UN ruled it was an illegal Weapon of Mass destruction -- the sheer IRONY of it all

edit on 1-12-2011 by ignant because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:19 PM by Soshh
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to
post by Soshh



Its not just about peter eyre... The Uranium Medical Research Centre (UMRC) is claiming that something different to depleted uranium was being used...



It says: "Without exception, every person donating urine specimens tested positive for uranium internal contamination. "The results were astounding: the donors presented concentrations of toxic and radioactive uranium isotopes between 100 and 400 times greater than in the Gulf veterans tested in 1999.

"If UMRC's Nangarhar findings are corroborated in other communities across Afghanistan, the country faces a severe public health disaster... Every subsequent generation is at risk."


www.siliconinvestor.com...


I'm not getting at you, but you say "the UMRC is claiming" as if this is new information. The thread essentially revolves around Peter Eyre because he is the nutter that has produced the claims in the OP.

Originally posted by ignant
"Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear Weapons"


What?!
edit on 1/12/11 by Soshh because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:27 PM by purplemer
reply to post by paraphi





f you care to look him up) thinks world politics are controlled by Christian and Jewish Zionist Bankers. Yawn. He’s made it up.



Well he is right on that front have a look at who owns the central banks in the world... Try the Rockfellas, the Rothchilds and the Morgans.....


reply posted on 1-12-2011 @ 05:28 PM by ignant
^ no biggie if i'm not making sense,

this article does, quoting again:

www.naturalnews.com...

"Depleted Uranium Shells Used by U.S. Military Worse Than Nuclear Weapons"

Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...

looks like US has found something worse than Nukes and has been using them on Iraq and Afghanistan

all the while UN ruled it was an illegal Weapon of Mass destruction -- the sheer IRONY of it all

edit on 1-12-2011 by ignant because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 3 days ago with 76 member flags
New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
The OKC bombing
  Posted 18 days ago with 6 member flags