posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 05:52 AM
Lol, nice little dramatic effect there with the USS Liberty. Shoving in irrelevant issues that fit in with your agenda is nothing but telling about
how (in)valid your argument is. I'd gladly argue about that horrible Liberty accident, being an accident, but by doing so I will only be trolled by
you.
And no, it's not money and US firepower that stop the world from relocating Israel. Money and US munitions sure didn't stop the Arab nations from
trying to relocate Israel, war after war, until that little reactor became known.
And don't kid yourself - if you know about it, rest assured the Arab leaders also know and knew about it not long after the stories about it got
published.
Ever since then, I have not witnessed any large, medium or even small scale of sovereign military forces that tried attacking us. Rather yet, proxy
militias that hide among civilians in order to avoid Israeli nuclear retaliation.
So yes, this supposed nuclear reactor is proven to be Israel's insurance policy on everything regarding invasions and attempts at relocating it (the
country). If it wasn't for the reactor, Israel wouldn't have small month-length skirmishes with Hizbollah and Hamas, rather large all-out battles with
the Syrian/Lebanese armies, which naturally would've been much more destructive battles.
edit on 3-12-2011 by IsraeliGuy because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3-12-2011 by IsraeliGuy because: (no reason given)