It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FLASHBACK: Homeless Lady with 15 Kids: ‘Somebody Needs to Pay for All My Children’

page: 11
36
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


My country is going socialist because we have a PM who won her power after a leadership challenge against a PM who WAS already elected in to power by the majority of Australian citizens.

All Juliar Gillard does is suck up to Obama and his cronies and implimenting some key US legislation in to Australia that is not sitting well with the Australian people.

Next Australian federal elections, she is gone. Thats IF she lasts that long.

In regards to the economy here, it's still in far better shape than the USA. We all know Europe and the US dominate the global economy; the price for being one of your biggest allies is going to be painful indeed.


edit on 2-12-2011 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:09 PM
link   
The federal government gives incentives for these actions. If they got rid of the earned income credit for children there would be no benefit of having kids as a single parent.

These conditions that these people were placed in, their surroundings and the general lack of quality education available to these people is also one of the problems.

I



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by bluemirage5
 





All Juliar Gillard does is suck up to Obama and his cronies and implimenting some key US legislation in to Australia that is not sitting well with the Australian people.

I'm Sorry To Hear this, I have to assume soon you'll be seeing and gearing this at Rallies.



I Really Do Apologize,,, Our Politicians are Very Happy To Give Away Our Hard Earned Tax Dollars To Win Votes!



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:35 PM
link   
To quote my local law enforcement when I did a ride along with them and we encountered a VERY similar woman.....

"I got a .25 cent fix for that B'###ch, and I got 15 of em ready and waiting on my hip. I wish she would just give me a reason....well a justifiable one that is"



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777

The politicians keep the people down, but the people haven't figured it out yet, we have a poor educational system and generation on welfare, shortages of jobs, so they leaned to work the system.



If someone manages to get her registered as a voter and drive her to a polling station, she would most likely vote Democrat. Those that are raised in a culture of dependence are not going to vote for someone who wants to end the gravy train.

I believe that there is indeed a political agenda behind this societies failure to teach people to be self sufficient.

edit on 12/2/2011 by Sparky63 because: spelling

edit on 12/2/2011 by Sparky63 because: spelling



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
In regards to kids in fostercare being drugged up, found this just moments ago:

www.dailymail.co.uk...

www.squidoo.com...



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 01:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by luciddream
I think there should be a rule, like 2 kids per family, unless you have sufficient income, and future savings to support more.

FYI not trying to say rich should have more kids or anything, i mean, you should have kids only if you can take care of them.


Why not implement medical sterilization for all children at the onset of puberty?

Surely that would address one of your concerns....only be allowed to have children (remove medical sterilization) when you can prove you have the means to raise a child.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Freenrgy2
 

NO why? because being poor can make kid's strive to be better, it can give them a purpose to get educated and get a good job to help the people they love.
If we did that none of these people would have been born
www.intelligenius.net...
I do think that we could limit the amount of kid's people have by having a Kid's Tax, if you have more than 2 Kid's you pay more Tax, that would make people think more about having more Kid's but who ever tried to bring that into a Law would be commiting political suicide....
edit on 2-12-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:39 PM
link   
This thread is horrifying.

The amount of bigotry and racism is appalling.

Posters have spewed the most racist and derogatory comments but yet jump all over another poster because they do not like what they said.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by boymonkey74
 


boymonkey74, I have to give you Credit, You've Hanged In There with your post about Better Education Programs and Taking Care of The Kids and All.
You're still trying I see and with out much support, I have starred some of your post and I Admire Your Stubbornness at trying to get your point across.

Taxing The Number Of Children you Have is a good idea, But like you said it won't go far Politically.
The question is and has been, How do we Break This Cycle Of Abuse of Our System and Take Care Of The Children?



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   
While I agree that she should not continue having kids and that it was unwise to have had these in the first place, how is that the children's fault? They are children. They are not responsible for their own existence and wellbeing. Whether one agrees with her attitude and actions or not, it should not be questionable that the children should be looked after in my opinion.

People get so caught up in the political debate that they focus on the mother and her statements rather than remembering the real victims that should matter more than anything else in this scenario - more than our political ideologies, more than their mothers' actions and beliefs - the children.

People may ask, "but should the state and the taxpayers have to pay for these children's wellbeing?" If the alternative is children being homeless, unfed, unclothed, unschooled, and uncared for? Hell yes. They are children. They matter more than us.

Just my two cents.
edit on 12/2/2011 by AceWombat04 because: Clarification and typos



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by nixie_nox
This thread is horrifying.

The amount of bigotry and racism is appalling.

Posters have spewed the most racist and derogatory comments but yet jump all over another poster because they do not like what they said.


I've Been Waiting For Some One To Pull The Old Dried Out Race Card B. S.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   
I'm wondering when this lady will be invited to do the progressive talk-show circuit. Perhaps Rosie's already contacted her about an appearance on her program. I'm thinking maybe a new reality show: Fifteen Kids and the Government Owes Me!

After all, the Octmom became an instant celebrity for uber-fecundity...and this gal's got Suleman beat hands down.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 


Someone needs to tell her to pay for her own damn children or quit spreading your legs.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 


Thanks fella
heck Iam not that smart and don't have the answers I wish I did but I do try to have Ideas, and if I came up with the answer to your question I would tell you all so we can make it happen and talking like this does get the old grey matter working.
What we need is Politicians with some backbone to do the things what will make society better in the long run even though they will be disliked. As long as they don't harm anyone.
Oh and Yes your right Iam stubborn



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   



I believe that there is indeed a political agenda behind this societies failure to teach people to be self sufficient.

edit on 12/2/2011 by Sparky63 because: spelling

edit on 12/2/2011 by Sparky63 because: spelling




POLITICALLY there is NO agenda. The politicians love slaves. They love slave voters to continue to elect them into cushy positions where they can exercise power and they enjoy the fruits of slave labor.
NATURALLY however or by the will of GOD, there probably is an agenda to make the strong who can survive
and be self sufficient grow and prosper. It's like a forest fire, it actually does good even though the results initially are devastating to animal and plants. Eventually the debris is consumed and there is fresh growth and the cycle we call life can continue again and again.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   
LMAO she said someone needs to be held accountable for not paying for her kids...look in the damn mirror!



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 


does anyone remember that giant pit from star wars in the desert that they try to throw luke skywalker in? the pit with the teeth that eats people. well anyways, this chic and many others should be thrown in there. problem solved. whats next on the agenda?



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 


It's people like these that need forced sterilization. What is more humane, that, or just letting her and her kids suffer? Or is paying the children's aid to ruin all of their lives worth the bother? I say sterilization would have been the most humane of options. Someone put this dumb cow out of her misery.



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by TheLastStand
 


Do people read all the posts? Thats what the Naz........Oh I give up



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join