I was checking out this article on CNN -
Happy Meal toys no longer free in San Francisco -
CNN
A new San Francisco law goes into effect on Thursday that prevents fast-food restaurants from giving away trinkets, action figures and other toys in
their kid's meals unless their food meets nutritional requirements.
The meat and grist of this new law is that fast-food restaurants now have to charge customers for something that was formally free with purchase,
which means profits.
If you take out the morality play this law declares itself to be, i.e. protecting the children from the big bad Corporate machine that has delicious
fries and toys just like Santa Clause, the law appears to be more a way for corporations to start making visible profits from something they have
previously taken losses on.
Don't get me wrong, I understand that some people will choose to go the healthier route for the lure of a free toy with the purchase of a meal, but
realistically part of the allure of getting the meal is the act of eating it. Kids like eating probably just about as much as the free toy they'll
have a short romance with, cover in ketchup then leave in the backseat to be forgotten.
I don't really know if ten cents will really raise an eyebrow, since purchases at the fash-food register tend to be frenetic and made hastily due to
the nature of the beast and ten cents probably won't sound like much when you've got a kid standing beside you that will be shattered for life if
the promise of a toy isn't fulfilled with every meal outside of the home.
What next, no quarter under the pillow for losing a tooth?
What I'm curious about regarding this law is the angle. There is a profit hiding under the pretext of a decision for the people, and that does not
appear to be addressed as a point behind why this law was passed...but how could making money not be a deciding factor?
Even if people go to different restaurants that can still offer free toys, think of the people who will just shrug off the ten cents and still go to
the same restaurants to feed their children.
Does this law strike any of you as devious as well?