It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eyebeam
I wonder why the base said anything at all. If it was a Mogul balloon it probably wouldn't have taken more than about a dozen soldiers and a 2-1/2 ton truck to pick up the not-very-sensitive balloons and the secret payload. Then about all they would had to do is keep Mac Brazel quiet and there wouldn't have been much more to it. That and the base seemed to call in a lot support from town for a unmanned balloon grounding.
Originally posted by draknoir2
My favorite Bill Birnes moment was when he told that guy that he was a Hybrid.
Pure gold.
Originally posted by MAC269
reply to post by Cosmic911
Dear Cosmic911
As a matter of interest in 1966, I was 14 years old and a friend of mine had heard of it and that was in England.
So what I am saying is the story was known at that time, however not by me.
Actually here it shows how you people get manipulated by TV, don't you have your own opinion based on the witnesses as if you were part of Burnes' team?
Actually here it shows how you people get manipulated by TV, don't you have your own opinion based on the witnesses as if you were part of Burnes' team?
Originally posted by Aliensun
reply to post by Cosmic911
As a very old UFOer, I must say, "You've got to be kidding or very ignorant of the history of UFOs as documented in many works along the way..
Good Lord, are you suggesting that nobody believed that Roswell was a legitimate event until Friedman and others jumped on the bandwagon?
This thread just goes to show how history can be forgotten and dis-remembered by the youngers. --I assume you have honest intentions here and are not up to some Newspeak tactic.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
As far as witness testimony, it's too subjective and qualitative, and thus unreliable. A witness may honestly believe what they saw was the truth but that truth may be so far from the truth that you've done 180. Even the most credible of witnesses may be wrong.edit on 1-12-2011 by Cosmic911 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
You probably could have stopped at "I know nothing about Bill Birnes", that much appears to be true.
Originally posted by thepainweaver
I know nothing about Bill Birnes, but I do know that words "he holds a law degree and received his B.A. from New York" is a very vague and misleading statement. It makes it sound like he is a lawyer or something people would see as "credible" or "intelligible". His B.A. is probably in public law or something.
He has a PhD so he doesn't need to try to impress anyone with his BA.
Originally posted by Imtor
Originally posted by Cosmic911
As far as witness testimony, it's too subjective and qualitative, and thus unreliable. A witness may honestly believe what they saw was the truth but that truth may be so far from the truth that you've done 180. Even the most credible of witnesses may be wrong.edit on 1-12-2011 by Cosmic911 because: (no reason given)
Some could be wrong, even pilots could be wrong but everybody from the trained people cannot be wrong.. Plus there is enough data to show there are flying objects that cannot be identified
No need to be a herpderp