I never expected *any* commonly performed measurement fully accurate but the following paragraph got me thinking:
from:
www.cmaj.ca...
30% to 40% of aneroid sphygmomanometers used by physicians are out of calibration by 4 mm Hg or more, and about 10% are out of calibration by 10 mm Hg
or more. [1] Inadequate preparation of patients, significant deviations from recommended technique and inaccurate sphygmomanometers often result in
blood pressure measurement errors of 10 mm Hg or more.
this is significant, but what would the estimated result of
underestimation by the same amount be?
Conversely, consistent underestimation of diastolic pressure by 5 mm Hg would reduce by 62% the number of patients perceived as
hypertensive. [8] These errors could deprive patients of therapy proven to be beneficial and could lead to increases in serious medical and social
complications. The effects of consistent errors of 10 mm Hg in systolic pressure could be similar.
Well, there go several billions in (legal) drug money...
In the same vein (pun intended) is it really a coincidence that they err on the high side? The answer is obvious, since there are always plans ready
to
lower the limits of what is considered healthy, much in the same way speed
limits are used.
Since the medical business has by no means a monopoly on pressure gauges, i can only suggest to use the normal cuff in combination with an
appropriately scaled third party pressure gauge and take it from there. Of course, you'll have to translate mmHg into bar or psi, HPa or whichever
you're comfortable with
(1 bar = 750mmHg).
edit on 2011.11.29 by Long
Lance because: (no reason given)