Inaccurate Blood Pressure Gauges and Hypertension, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 29-11-2011 @ 01:50 PM by Long Lance
I never expected *any* commonly performed measurement fully accurate but the following paragraph got me thinking:

from:
www.cmaj.ca...



30% to 40% of aneroid sphygmomanometers used by physicians are out of calibration by 4 mm Hg or more, and about 10% are out of calibration by 10 mm Hg or more. [1] Inadequate preparation of patients, significant deviations from recommended technique and inaccurate sphygmomanometers often result in blood pressure measurement errors of 10 mm Hg or more.

this is significant, but what would the estimated result of underestimation by the same amount be?



Conversely, consistent underestimation of diastolic pressure by 5 mm Hg would reduce by 62% the number of patients perceived as hypertensive. [8] These errors could deprive patients of therapy proven to be beneficial and could lead to increases in serious medical and social complications. The effects of consistent errors of 10 mm Hg in systolic pressure could be similar.



Well, there go several billions in (legal) drug money...

In the same vein (pun intended) is it really a coincidence that they err on the high side? The answer is obvious, since there are always plans ready to lower the limits of what is considered healthy, much in the same way speed limits are used.

Since the medical business has by no means a monopoly on pressure gauges, i can only suggest to use the normal cuff in combination with an appropriately scaled third party pressure gauge and take it from there. Of course, you'll have to translate mmHg into bar or psi, HPa or whichever you're comfortable with (1 bar = 750mmHg).
edit on 2011.11.29 by Long Lance because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 30-11-2011 @ 03:01 PM by Long Lance
reply to post by webpirate



a couple of mmHg more will mean medication, the diastolic threshold for mild hypertension is only 10mm above the standard (80). all i am saying is that these readings have profound consequences and they are usually on the high side.

'erring on the side of caution' is impossible when deviations at both ends of the spectrum are considered pathological. blood pressure readings aren't rocket science just listen to blood gushing noise and note where it starts and ends. some errors must be attributed to the gauge since it is hard to believe that the majority of nurses and doctors get it wrong half the time.


reply posted on 30-11-2011 @ 07:10 PM by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by Long Lance
reply to
post by webpirate



a couple of mmHg more will mean medication, the diastolic threshold for mild hypertension is only 10mm above the standard (80). all i am saying is that these readings have profound consequences and they are usually on the high side.


Typically, people who are stage 1 hypertensive will be trialed on a few months of diet modification and exercise before medications are added.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Church of HIV: Inventing the AIDS Virus
  Posted 9 days ago with 64 member flags
DIY lets cure cancer simple as that
  Posted 4 days ago with 19 member flags
Why are dead people waking up around the world?
  Posted 8 days ago with 12 member flags
Dying For A Smile
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Harvard To Be Tried for Alzheimer\'s Research Fraud
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags
Man loses penis to flesh eating bacteria
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags