Originally posted by Laurauk
Off course they colluded in the riots in the UK. So they could find it more easier to erode more of the UK citizens democratic rights in the UK.
Colluded, with whom and how? Also, what rights are we losing, about to lose or have lost since? In fact, this Government seeks to remove an awful lot
of legislation passed by the previous Giovernment, including the Anti-Terror laws passed by Bliar and chums. Not sure what you're alluding to hear,
apart from parrotting the party line, as it where...
Originally posted by Laurauk
If the Police had sorted this situation out in the first place instead off refusing to talk to those protesting, with regards to the shooting of an
individual. The riots would not have kicked off in the first place.
You will find the Police will refuse to talk to anybody about an ongoing investigation, especially in the case of a Police shooting where they defer
to the IPCC. You wouldn't want them spouting off to everybody anytime anything happens, would you? Again, not sure what your point is here.
Besides, the riots kicked off not because of the shooting, as that demo was peaceful. It was an opportunistic thing led my idiots who saw there chance
to "get one back" at the Fuzz.
Originally posted by Laurauk
And if the Met had taken control of the situation, rather than standing back and allowing those to loot shops ransack and burn down homes etc, Then
the riots would have spread across England.
Hmm, quite a contradiction here, Laura. Your opening gambit was that these riots were perpetrated by a fifth column to erode our rights, but then
claim the Police didn't act quick enough or forcefully enough (ie: suppress our "Democratic rights")... Which is it?
The Police got a hard time over the G20, so this time round they went softly and, again, got a hard time. With people like you raising contradictory
points, it's pretty impossible to please as you yourself are not even sure what your on about.