It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by ILikeStars
That all seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
I felt he was admitting that the Obama Administration had legitimate complaints about the previous administration, and the current state of affairs. The question was not about FOX's credibility, but about Wallace's opinion of Mr. Obama's "whining".
I hope you have a good evening (or had one) too.
Originally posted by ILikeStars
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by ILikeStars
I watched it, and did as you said, so I'll bite:
What's your point?
See ya,
Milt
In reference to Wallace calling the Obama administration the biggest bunch of cry babies he's ever dealt with in Washington in 30 years and the right wing narrative presented by FOX "News"....
"Well, I don't think they are whining over nothing. I think they have .. look, there are legitimate complaints that they can have." - Roger Ailes, president of Fox News Channel
edit on 30-11-2011 by ILikeStars because: remove bb code that did not work.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
If you recognize that they both lie why are you trying to take the thread off topic with the others rather than just saying "yeah they do lie, so do others."
The Associated Press reports about a dozen people in all at that event were visible carrying firearms. And if the scene looks familiar, that’s because it should, last week a guy stood outside Obama’s health care town hall in Portsmouth, New Hampshire with a gun strapped to his leg and police arrested a 62-year-old before that New Hampshire event for carrying unlicensed loaded gun. And the reason we’re talking about this, a lot of talk here, Dylan, because people feel like, yes, there are Second Amendment rights for sure but also there are questions about whether this has racial overtones.
However, Fox’s 35 percent score places it exactly at the national average. This seems paradoxical -- Fox ranks near the bottom of a long list of media outlets, yet it sits right at the national average. But there’s an explanation. Lots of respondents reported following none of the media outlets they were asked about, and those respondents did quite poorly on the knowledge quiz -- not surprisingly. That meant that the non-media-using respondents brought down the national average, but they didn’t constitute a separate category that ranked lower than Fox on Pew’s chart.
Since Stewart was referring to "media viewers," this doesn’t undercut his point. However, the data includes an important counterpoint to Stewart’s claim: Viewers of at least one show on Fox scored quite well -- The O’Reilly Factor, of whom 51 percent made it into the high knowledge group. That made it equal to National Public Radio -- a longtime target of conservative complaints about liberal media bias -- and only three percentage points behind Stewart’s own show, at 54 percent.
Once again, Fox News as a whole ranked fairly low among regularly used media outlets -- 20 percent answered all four correctly and 18 percent answered three correctly. Still, those numbers beat the national average of 14 percent and 20 percent, respectively. (The best-scoring outlet, the Wall Street Journal, posted scores of 51 percent and 23 percent, respectively.)
Fox actually scored better than its two direct cable-news rivals -- MSNBC, which is a liberal counterpoint to Fox, and CNN, which is considered more middle-of-the-road. Also scoring lower than Fox were local television news, the evening network news shows and the network morning shows.
And for the third time, particular Fox shows scored well. Hannity ranked fifth (just ahead of MSNBC’s liberal shows hosted by Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow) and O’Reilly ranked ninth. For the first time, Pew included Glenn Beck in its rankings, and the Fox host finished 12th -- slightly ahead of Stewart’s own Daily Show.
The way Stewart phrased the comment, it’s not enough to show a sliver of evidence that Fox News’ audience is ill-informed. The evidence needs to support the view that the data shows they are "consistently" misinformed -- a term he used not once but three times. It’s simply not true that "every poll" shows that result. So we rate his claim False
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
They are doing NOTHING worse than anyone else...they just do it from the other end of the political spectrum.
All the cool kids hate Fox.
Seriously though, I don't get it either. People generally point to news commentators as proof that Fox is evil incarnate while ignoring that O'Reilly and the like have their own shows in order to comment on the news and aren't part of an actual news broadcast.
The distinction between the two is often ignored and when you show that the other side of the coin is just as bad it turns into name-calling hour on the playground because obviously you're an idiot if you don't buy everything MSNBC and CNN say while hating on Fox at every turn. It's ridiculous really.
I happen to know that all of those shows are subject to network input, Fox has a weekly, locked PDF that plots the focus and course of the entire entity.
What is really rediculous is that people who watch fox claim that they hated BUSH and the neocon candidates that constitute the entire field.
FOX is conservatisms worst enemy
Originally posted by Jenna
And just for giggles, here's Politifact's article on Jon Stewart's claim that Fox viewers are less informed than other network viewers.
(Fox News broadcasts) The claim that the Democratic health care law is a "government takeover of health care" is our 2010 Lie of the Year.
Politifact
(Fox News broadcasts) Seniors and the disabled "will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care."
-Sarah Palin, Friday, August 7th, 2009.
Politifact.
Politifact, the same source that awarded FOX News with 2010 Lie of the year and 2009 lie of the year.
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
I like this picture.
Do you see anything wrong with it? Hint 120%
Unless there version of multiple choice means you can give multiple answers like Romney!edit on 28-11-2011 by JBA2848 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BenReclused
At the same time, though, I feel you were enhancing evidence in a effort to support your argument.