It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dr Burzynski - amazing suppressed anti cancer treatment - Antineoplastons - READ FROM HIS SITE!!!

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 07:15 AM
link   
Typically this guy has been hounded by the FDA who tried to put him on trial and in jail but didn't have any evidence to back up their attack, so the trials failed.

He has some amazing patient success stories, and if you read his cv, is a VERY smart cookie.
Did a phD in one year, came top of the year at his uni in poland; has all these patents for inventions, and is getting results.

So typically the FDA wants to get rid of him. We can't have people going around curing little kids of brain tumours and cancer can we?

Look guys, if this has already been posted, too bad. I only just heard of this after doing a LOT of research into cancer treatments so plenty of others here won't have heard of it either. I'm spreading the word in case anyone wants to look this up; and this post is for them.

Link to his website with info

Here are some links about that attacks made on him by the FDA.

Linky 1

Linky 2

Linky 3

Read and Enjoy.

(If you know anyone with cancer, this info should make you pretty p****d off at the FDA and Big Pharma.




posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 07:39 AM
link   
pls star and flag this thread - i think it's important that as many ppl as possible read and watch the info that's in the links i posted.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 07:57 AM
link   
reply to post by rapunzel222
 


personally , i dont mind reposting thing like that, simply because these kind of things should be there for every one to see and know about every day of the week all year , and thats if this guy is genuine , and i hope so , but the thing is why is he staying where he is and letting the FDA control him and what he does ? why not just move to another country that will allow him to practice what he does freely ?

ill star and flag you even though this was posted before



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:01 AM
link   
well, i'm glad he's sticking it out where he is - i think america's lucky to have him.

if you watch the video on his site with the story about the little girl who recovered from an inoperable (i think) brain tumour - it's pretty impressive.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   
reply to post by rapunzel222
 

Not saying he is good or bad but the FDA while sometimes very wrong could be right in this case. Some activity I have read about with regards this guy just screams Quack to me..
Dr Burzynski on Quackometer
Tread carefully.

Cheers

CTH



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:08 AM
link   
Here's a link to a video on the subject called "Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business - FDA Tyranny"

www.conspiracydocumentaries.com...




The trillion dollar cancer industry has been waging an illegal and immoral war on Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski for years, attempting to stop him… that’s right, STOP him, from saving the lives of cancer sufferers through the use of his patented breakthrough therapy, which uses a natural and non-toxic substance called antineoplastons. This video tells the story of how Dr. Burzynski, and the patients his therapy has cured of what are normally terminal cancers, have fought the FDA and the big drug companies who have continually and systematically tried to discredit and punish a man who’s only purpose in life has been to develop and perfect a life-giving and non-toxic cure for the disease of the 20th century.


Its a must watch.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:13 AM
link   
There is a great movie about Dr Burzynski, Burzynski The Movie - Cancer Is Serious Business

I first learned about him from a thread about the movie on ATS a few months ago. After I watched it I was amazed. The impressive thing about the movie is they have everything from the movie sourced on the website. Very interesting read and viewing.

Here is the movie on YouTube: (if you are a Netflix subscriber, it is available on streaming)


The movie website with sources is here: Burzynski Movie Transcripts

One thing I noted after I watched the movie is, the way the trials are setup per the FDA is that the patient has to receive "traditional" treatments first, then can apply to the trial.


My opinion is the FDA wrote that in to try and make it seem this treatment does not work. I believe the survival rate for the trial participants would be higher without that FDA rule.

OiO

edit on 28-11-2011 by OneisOne because: typo!



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:13 AM
link   
reply to post by CthulhuRising
 


Im not sure about any validity of saying he does not know his stuff in any way at all. Usually Professor status even Assistant Professor, that is the ability to teach up to Phd in the subject of Medicine, means he is far from any "Quak"


From 1970 to 1977, while a researcher and Assistant Professor at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, his research was sponsored and partially funded by the National Cancer Institute. At Baylor, he authored and co-authored 16 publications, including 5 concerning his research on peptides and their effect on human cancer.

Four of these publications were also co-authored by other doctors associated with M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, and Baylor College of Medicine. It was at Baylor that Dr. Burzynski named these peptides "Antineoplastons" due to their activity in correcting and normalizing neoplastic, or cancerous, cells.

In May of 1977, Dr. Burzynski received a Certificate of Appreciation from Baylor College of Medicine, commending him for completing five years of dedicated service and acknowledging his contributions made to the "Advancement of Medical Education, Research, and Health Care."
1

He seems like the real thing, thanks OP am researching more.

Kind Regards,

Elf



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 08:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by OneisOne


One thing I noted after I watched the movie is, the way the trials are setup per the FDA is that the patient has to receive "traditional" treatments first, then can apply to the trial.




yeah its like when someone gives you a burned meat and then asks you to cook it and when your done he will tell you that you , see ? i told you that you couldnt cook



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   
bumping

so that more people read the thread...

people should write to the texas medical board etc if this story makes you mad.

let them know how you feel?



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by CthulhuRising
reply to post by rapunzel222
 

Not saying he is good or bad but the FDA while sometimes very wrong could be right in this case. Some activity I have read about with regards this guy just screams Quack to me..
Dr Burzynski on Quackometer
Tread carefully.

Cheers

CTH


if he can do a phd in one year and top his uni class in poland at medicine and has a cv with a list of awards from prestigous unis and institutes a mile long; and a massive list of publications etc etc etc
and cure kids of inoperable brain tumours, and others of terminal cancer - who have testified for him on youtube and you can find all this on the net

then i'm happy to take my chances with this 'quack'.

think they're probably better than with big pharma somehow.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by CthulhuRising
reply to post by rapunzel222
 

Not saying he is good or bad but the FDA while sometimes very wrong could be right in this case. Some activity I have read about with regards this guy just screams Quack to me..
Dr Burzynski on Quackometer
Tread carefully.

Cheers

CTH


well i've read it; and the guy's lawyer is correct (speaking myself as a lawyer which i am), the owner of the quackometer site is defaming this guy and breaking the law in my opinion.

after reading this info, i would just say it gives even more weight to my original comments about the way this man's being treated by big pharma and the FDA.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by rapunzel222
 

If "Big Pharma" had been injecting people with experimental products for thirty years, with no evidence that they actually cure cancer, and charging tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars per patient, people here would rightly be calling for their heads. But because it's just one guy, and because he has an infomercial marketed as a movie, he's a hero and his work has been "suppressed." The actual suppression is done by Burzynski's public relations goon, Marc Stephens, who goes around the internet sending lawyeresque "warnings" to sites that publish derogatory information about Burzynski.

www.quackometer.net...
rhysmorgan.co...



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 09:56 AM
link   
Yes, poor abused Dr. Burzynski.
www.burzynskiclinic.com...

Sounds like "big pharma" would be interested in something like this.

Antineoplastons are given orally or by injection into a vein. The duration of treatment usually ranges from eight to twelve months. A year of treatment can cost from $30,000 to $60,000, depending on the type of treatment, number of consultations, and the need for surgery to implant a catheter for drug delivery.


Maybe if the results of his studies show any promise they will be.

Although some proponents of antineoplaston therapy have suggested that the reviews of this treatment by conventional cancer specialists are biased by mistrust of alternative therapies, even some prominent figures in the field of alternative medicine have reservations about antineoplastons. According to Dr. Andrew Weil, "Over the years, Dr. Burzynski claims to have treated more than 8,000 patients, but his success rates are unknown. His Web site states only that he has helped 'many' people. If antineoplaston therapy works, we should have scientific studies showing what percentage of patients treated have survived and for how long, as well as evidence showing how Dr. Burzynski's method stacks up against conventional cancer treatment…. Until we have credible scientific evidence showing what antineoplastons are, how they act in the body, and what realistic expectations of treatment with them might be, I see no reason for any cancer patient to take this route."

Source
Dr. Weil is not a big fan of the FDA but he does know something about proper science.

How annoying that clinical trials be required instead of anecdotal reports.

edit on 11/28/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 

Burzynski's only been at this for 30+ years. I'm sure he'll have his data ready for publication soon. Good science takes time.



posted on Nov, 28 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Posted here a few days ago:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion in the above linked thread.
Thanks




**Thread Closed**


for future reference:

We Have A New Search Engine--Please Use It!



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join