It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by callacas
Dear OP, How much is the original picture You own worth ? - what's Your´s price ?
Originally posted by phantomjack
reply to post by phantomjack
One more...highlighting the area where the artifact appears:
LINK
Originally posted by IAMTAT
Originally posted by phantomjack
reply to post by phantomjack
One more...highlighting the area where the artifact appears:
LINK
meaning the pixels that are in a straight line in the scanned photo -- just odd to have that many pixels lined up like a line, and beginning at the very top center of the ship.
What do you mean by 'Artifact'?
Originally posted by franspeakfree
reply to post by NebulaZero
The antenna would be disproportionate to its size, the more I am looking at this the more I am seeing the line from the top mid centre to the sky. However, if this is the case the trees are very high up, how is it done?
Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by IAMTAT
Even classic/old fake photos are valuable - someone will pay you to use it in their their book or to add it to a collection. Go to eBay if it's not sentimental, and find the lowest bid you're comfortable with and you might just make a nice little chunk of change.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
reply to post by NebulaZero
The antenna would be disproportionate to its size, the more I am looking at this the more I am seeing the line from the top mid centre to the sky. However, if this is the case the trees are very high up, how is it done?
Originally posted by phantomjack
reply to post by NebulaZero
And why would a space craft need an "antenna" to begin with? I mean, if they could travel at the speed of light, at unmeasurable distances, surely they have the technology to embed the antenna in a less than a 1950's type look, no?
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by franspeakfree
reply to post by NebulaZero
The antenna would be disproportionate to its size, the more I am looking at this the more I am seeing the line from the top mid centre to the sky. However, if this is the case the trees are very high up, how is it done?
Well, it would be all about perspective. A fishing pole with the thing dangling about 5 feet in front of the camera could seem that it is further up in the sky than what it really is....
And why would a space craft need an "antenna" to begin with? I mean, if they could travel at the speed of light, at unmeasurable distances, surely they have the technology to embed the antenna in a less than a 1950's type look, no?
Originally posted by IAMTAT
Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by IAMTAT
Even classic/old fake photos are valuable - someone will pay you to use it in their their book or to add it to a collection. Go to eBay if it's not sentimental, and find the lowest bid you're comfortable with and you might just make a nice little chunk of change.
Thanks for the advice, but I think I'll just hang on to it. It's very cool.
Originally posted by darkest4
reply to post by phantomjack
Why are people making excuses for it to be a UFO. That is ridiculous and in direct contradiction to occam's razor. This is the type of desperate thinking that makes the UFO field an utter joke with all the "believers" who want to believe some random stupid picture that fraudsters billy meier produced dozens off dozens of years ago even. Even when presented with evidence of a string? Seriously people? It's very easy to do pictures like this with forced perspective. I can't believe anyone is saying they "believe" it's real just on seeing this random photo rofl.
Why are people even debating this? It's worthless as "evidence". You need multiple independent witnesses, the source, unaltered photo/video, expert analysis and so on before anything can even come close to evidence. This is just another silly random photo with a vague unverified story and an anonymous "friend" source which can EASILY be faked. Utterly useless.
forgetomori.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 28-11-2011 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by darkest4
reply to post by phantomjack
Why are people making excuses for it to be a UFO. That is ridiculous and in direct contradiction to occam's razor. This is the type of desperate thinking that makes the UFO field an utter joke with all the "believers" who want to believe some random stupid picture that fraudsters billy meier produced dozens off dozens of years ago even. It's very easy to do pictures like this with forced perspective. I can't believe anyone is saying they "believe" it's real just on seeing this random photo rofl.
Why are people even debating this? It's worthless as "evidence". You need multiple independent witnesses, the source, unaltered photo/video, expert analysis and so on before anything can even come close to evidence. This is just another silly random photo with a vague unverified story and an anonymous "friend" source which can EASILY be faked. Utterly useless.
forgetomori.com...
en.wikipedia.org...