So either there is a God or there is not and I don't believe all we see and do in the here now is an empty dimension or planet that only offers loneliness to the earth. There are too many other things going on that defies explanation so I won't rest on godlessness as the final answer.

I wonder if the next move is Alienolgy, they are finding lots of planets, trouble looms across the globe, increase of natural disasters, nuclear leaks, earthquakes from the sea, manmade viruses to name a few, maybe Aliens will come down to help us, I wonder if its really alien in nature if that is the case because the stage is being set up that way.

If there is no exact version of a living God in precise written form as to his nature and rules but I still believe in God like many other millions do around the world then the situation is that whatever we were lead to believe we can never be judged by a Godly being for it being wrong, somewhere down the line someone other than the Billions out there has to put the blame on history on depending in which God was the right path to him.

Which then brings me to the Anti-Christ theory who will try and lead the world down his many paths and his mission will always make the real God an enemy to him, so either there is a right path or there is not, but can God really judge millions for their choosing a wrong sided faith because somewhere down the line Billions today have not got the right message? Maybe their judgements will be on their actions alone meaning the level playing field will always be that a Being like God would favour just out of faith alone many to live for eternity at some point in the infinite universe where all things are possible.

This coming from a God Being that sees all faiths telling it wrongly but it was not the fault of the masses, so on judgement day if there is such a thing it will be an open playing field of not putting so much blame on mankind, those who got it right in their faith and worked to keep it will have greater reward in their works along with their spiritual battles that could have become a loss in their beliefs to be rewarded with extra merits. Again the Bible describes Two Resurrections, one for the believers to rise first and the rest a thousand years later including the righteous man and people of good nature so in that logic that also makes spiritual sense.

At this rate all written faith has no pure evidence or accuracy or authority from a Godly being if that case is true, but by faith I say that even with the parts missing combine all the evidence of what has been found they fill the gaps from the original books, if not then something is not being said right out there. There was also Oral Traditions that would have helped fill in the gaps along the way that would have at some point combined the books and what was in them.

Even so some things from my own experiences that I would not fully explain here is that when I have used the Bible, repeated certain texts from it in the form of thought, held up crosses it has had an effect on people. Either it works or it does not but that is another story.

Either way there is something in the text that has an effect on people in ways we can not explain yet, maybe there is something that not even the writers know or are telling us and that for some reason what the scriptures hold is very holy or they have a spiritual effect .

If this is true I do not know,
they say that all the parts of the Bible fit when you add all the missing parts from people who quoted from the scrolls before the Bible as a book was put together.

Meaning if you go through all the research all the pieces fit together into the Bible we know today.

If this is true then so be it, if not then something is wrong where information is not being said either by those against the Bible in everyway or by a religious powers that have edited it.

There is a range of ancient manuscripts and quotes by people who predate even the oldest known Bible, the story is not always to prove Jesus is the Christ many others have written that this is the case before we even come to put the oldest Bible together.

You could make two Bibles, one that proves of what we have today out of the many text and other manuscripts found other than the oldest books and one that includes all disregarded books and missing text that would not make much of a religion when putting it together since Doubting Thomas and Judas are not exactly known for their faithful works.

I probably personally could not go through every ancient script in time to try and prove either way so will leave it to faith on this one, makes me a better person in this chaotic world either way.

Unless God is a time traveller and he updates his work all the time putting the timeline right.

I will still hold onto faith, like I said I can neither prove it or disprove it, translate or not, people for all different reasons find God or experience things that the scientific world can not prove or see and I believe that not all balls have been played out just yet on court.

But here is what you guys say and here is what other say, all in all I still believe in God of the Bible, experienced things and seen glimpses of things you should not but that is ok because it takes faith to even get that far into it.

Like it or not God still exists for me.

Here are what other people are saying on the internet, if it means that much that the ancient text is all wrong then write to them and find out for sure, I am too much of an amateur like the rest of them to know for sure so I guess your impact will be greater with them if you convince them rather than convincing me.
I will quote from this guy's site to see if he is telling the truth or not, if not write to these people since you both are experts.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Manuscript Support for the
Bible's Reliability
by Ron Rhodes
Manuscript Evidence for the New Testament

There are more than 24,000 partial and complete manuscript copies of the New Testament.

These manuscript copies are very ancient and they are available for inspection now.

There are also some 86,000 quotations from the early church fathers and several thousand Lectionaries (church-service books containing Scripture quotations used in the early centuries of Christianity).

Bottom line: the New Testament has an overwhelming amount of evidence supporting its reliability.

The Variants in the New Testament Manuscripts Are Minimal
In the many thousands of manuscript copies we possess of the New Testament, scholars have discovered that there are some 150,000 "variants."

This may seem like a staggering figure to the uninformed mind.

But to those who study the issue, the numbers are not so damning as it may initially appear.

Indeed, a look at the hard evidence shows that the New Testament manuscripts are amazingly accurate and trustworthy.
To begin, we must emphasize that out of these 150,000 variants, 99 percent hold virtually no significance whatsoever.

Many of these variants simply involve a missing letter in a word; some involve reversing the order of two words (such as "Christ Jesus" instead of "Jesus Christ"); some may involve the absence of one or more insignificant words.

Really, when all the facts are put on the table, only about 50 of the variants have any real significance - and even then, no doctrine of the Christian faith or any moral commandment is effected by them.

For more than ninety-nine percent of the cases the original text can be reconstructed to a practical certainty.

Even in the few cases where some perplexity remains, this does not impinge on the meaning of Scripture to the point of clouding a tenet of the faith or a mandate of life.
Thus, in the Bible as we have it (and as it is conveyed to us through faithful translations) we do have for practical purposes the very Word of God, inasmuch as the manuscripts do convey to us the complete vital truth of the originals.

By practicing the science of textual criticism - comparing all the available manuscripts with each other - we can come to an assurance regarding what the original document must have said.

Let us suppose we have five manuscript copies of an original document that no longer exists. Each of the manuscript copies are different. Our goal is to compare the manuscript copies and ascertain what the original must have said. Here are the five copies:
Manuscript #1: Jesus Christ is the Savior of the whole worl.

Manuscript #2: Christ Jesus is the Savior of the whole world.

Manuscript #3: Jesus Christ s the Savior of the whole world.

Manuscript #4: Jesus Christ is th Savior of the whle world.

Manuscript #5: Jesus Christ is the Savor of the whole wrld.
Could you, by comparing the manuscript copies, ascertain what the original document said with a high degree of certainty that you are correct? Of course you could.

This illustration may be extremely simplistic, but a great majority of the 150,000 variants are solved by the above methodology.

By comparing the various manuscripts, all of which contain very minor differences like the above, it becomes fairly clear what the original must have said.

Most of the manuscript variations concern matters of spelling, word order, tenses, and the like; no single doctrine is affected by them in any way.

We must also emphasize that the sheer volume of manuscripts we possess greatly narrows the margin of doubt regarding what the original biblical document said.

If the number of [manuscripts] increases the number of scribal errors, it increases proportionately the means of correcting such errors, so that the margin of doubt left in the process of recovering the exact original wording is not so large as might be feared; it is in truth remarkably small.