It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by trentyh
This situation could get out of hand very quickly because China and Russia have both declared that they will defend Syria against any hostile aggression... This is beginning to look a lot like the development of WWll where everybody is picking sides... We have on both sides' a nuclear superpower, this can get bad very quickly....
Originally posted by mps3119
. .. so I guess by this logic if the Russians hadn't removed there missiles from Cuba during the Cuban missile crises and then they launched and attack on us from ohhh I dunno Russia or Submarines . . we woulda been wrong to take out there missile bases in Cuba? . .. NO it makes Cuba in that case scenario guilty by association
Originally posted by mps3119
reply to post by Xcathdra
NATO is us . ... we (USA) provide most of the funding and equipment
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
So is that missile defense system in Turkey the one that Russia has been going on about and wanting rid of? Is that basically like a "we got that for ya" to Russia? Brownie points?
Also isn't the system there because of Iran? Can they really destroy a system that is designed to keep them from destroying anything?edit on 26-11-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
43. Previous reports by the Director General have identified outstanding issues related to possible military
dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme and actions required of Iran to resolve these.31 In particular, the
Agency is increasingly concerned about the possible existence in Iran of past or current undisclosed nuclear
related activities involving military related organizations, including activities related to the development of a
nuclear payload for a missile, about which the Agency continues to receive new information. Examples of
these activities were listed in the previous report.32 The information available to the Agency in connection
with these outstanding issues is extensive and comprehensive and has been acquired both from many
Member States and through its own efforts. It is also broadly consistent and credible in terms of technical
detail, the time frame in which the activities were conducted and the people and organisations involved.
Iran has refused to allow IAEA inspectors into certain sites.
Iran has refused to list all sites involved in their program.
Iran has hidden sites not disclosed to the IAEA.
Iranhas refused to make all of their scientists involved in the program avaialble for IAEA inspectors.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
Well.. it does in the sense that that system is there to prevent them from launching rocket attacks. So if they were attacked they would have to take that out before they could defend themselves in any other way.
It could actually just be a heads up to Turkey. Letting them know they have to hit that if they are attacked and that they are not trying to attack Turkey as a nation.
I don't know though. Just a guess.
Tehran says NATO's early warning radar station in Turkey is meant to protect Israel against Iranian missile attacks if a war breaks out with the Jewish state. Ankara agreed to host the radar in September as part of NATO's missile defense system aimed at countering ballistic missile threats from neighboring Iran.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
So is that missile defense system in Turkey the one that Russia has been going on about and wanting rid of? Is that basically like a "we got that for ya" to Russia? Brownie points?
Also isn't the system there because of Iran? Can they really destroy a system that is designed to keep them from destroying anything?edit on 26-11-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)