The shocking truth about the crackdown on Occupy

page: 4
57
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   
Titor might have been right? I haven't read anything about him in years, but he's what got me into finding the truth

Thanks for the info. I think it's going to take violence. Since the people didn't stand up years ago, it's past the point of peaceful protesting.




posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 05:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by korathin
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I don't think it really matters. The OWS made their bed, let them rot in it. The reason why they are going after the OWS is because the OWS messed up and alienated anyone that wasn't an extreme leftist. Heck look at their "progressive caucus", and how racist and sexist it is. Basically a "progressive caucus" is if you have light colored skin+ a male genitalia you have to speak last if at all. I guess that fit's in well with all the male hating bigots and Caucasian hating bigots + all the self loathing mangina's that make up a certain percentage of OWS people.

They limited the amount of support they will ever receive because of their bigotry. So they where tolerated for a minute on the hopes that it would fizzle out on it's own. That hasn't happened because of how homogenous the group think is among OWS. There is kind of a group think cult mentally among OWS supporters and participants. That makes them highly dangerous in a very limited kind of way. Meaning if the OWS people were left alone they would eventually resort to terrorism or a Charles Manson like night of knife play.

Add all that together, and any outrage at how OWS are being treated won't last beyond 30 day's when they are all mopped up. Like I said, this course of events is a direct result of their stupidity and bigotry. Then again if they tried to appeal to a larger demography, they would of been shut down much more quickly with lethal level of force. That would of triggered a series of events which could of lead to a very real insurrection. So take it for what you will. But as it stands, OWS are just annoying squatters. The main risk with OWS, is that it fuels other, not so bigoted social movements. That would be very bad for the fascist/communist's/progressive/banker/NWO'ers.




You sound like an ignorant anus who has the MSM mainlined in your arm.

OWS is the real deal and I am proud that it gets all you status quo loving, group thinkers
pissing in your panties and foaming at the mouth!

Bring it on tough guy!
edit on 27-11-2011 by mastahunta because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox

Originally posted by korathin
I don't think it really matters. The OWS made their bed, let them rot in it. The reason why they are going after the OWS is because the OWS messed up and alienated anyone that wasn't an extreme leftist.


Your definition of extreme leftist being... what, exactly? I'm sorry chief, but looking at the rest of the post, you've not been alienated for not being an "extreme leftist," you've alienated yourself with your rage, your ignorance, and your crappy attitude.


see? it's like talking to the authorities.
"the problem is in you peasant, not us".

lol.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by Vitchilo
 

your logic is flawless

if this movement was banker controlled why did the banking pupets and politicains colude to remove it.


for a show. to give this psyop called ows some credibility.
because otherwise people might suspect that ows is nothing
more than the continuation of the fake arab spring. which was
a test run.

by the way, anyone remembers julian assange and those radical
left rape victims?

yeah. thought so.
not a peep.
why?
well...



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Unknown Soldier
 


kettle calling pot black.
that's why 99pct mantra will never work.
and, to tell you the truth, it was designed
that way from the start.

remember usdayofrage?
of course you don't.

lol.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by korathin
 





Not really. It is the same path of Jim Jones + many others. But that would require a lot of stuff happening. My personnel beliefs I play a role I guess. 1) Golden Rule, 2) Followed by the law of Mutuality. OWS=Male haters, me= male, so me hates OWS. It is really simple logic. You have to remember that since the personnel is political, one must make the political personnel.


OWS=Male Haters?

Really?!

LMAO - where do you get this stuff? Do you just make it up as you go along?

BTW - I think the word you were looking for in your paragraph above is personal, not personnel. Changes the entire meaning. Or maybe you did mean personnel... but I am not the grammar police - just trying to help.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
Ummm WE ARE LIVING IN A TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY!!!


uuuum well, einstein, why is that?
COULD it be because of 9/11, eh?
naaaah. it can't be. right?

now, take a look how many ows supporters support
9/11 truth. and also, in the very near future, check out
the official ows list of demands and see if they put 9/11
truth in that list.

but nooo. 9/11 truth is "too fringy". for #'s sake, even
noam chomsky (whom many of the ows supporters adore)
is lying about 9/11.

yeah, ows.
just like the authorities, they think sheeple are retarded and
too busy to pay some mother#ing attention. because, to the
elites (and ows is an elitist psyop, mainly because of timing and
some other telling details), the populus is nothing more than a
bunch of 5yr olds that are there to be yanked and manipulated with.

same # with ows. criticise ows? oh you must be krazzzy!
lol.

but then again i could be wrong.
and noam chomsky didn't lie about 9/11.
and saddam had wmds.
and barry did kill usama.

lol.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 


speak some 9/11 truth, drone.
see how far will that get you considering ows official demands list.
and see how many of those establishment fake leftists (chomsky,
moore, zinn, zizic etc) will simply jump off the ows bandwagon
if 9/11 truth became a part of the official demands list.

see?
what we're dealing here with are fake leftgatekeepers.
mind you, much better choice than the babyseal clubbing
neocons, but just like in the bush days, these fake left
gatekeepers will be talking about illegal wars and lies about
wmds, but not many will dare call 9/11 an inside job.

why?
because they are part of the establishment.
anyone remembers charlie veitch?
same #, kids.
edit on 27-11-2011 by psyop911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I wonder why the camera always starts rolling when the police respond. Why is it never rolling when the police are attacked first? Don't get me wrong... I know there are A LOT of cops out there that abuse their power and authority, and they violate people's civil rights daily, but I want both sides of the stories mentioned in the OP. Also, who cares if that guy is a poet, that has nothing to do with anything. I find the fact that you call Jon Leibowitz (AKA Jon Stewart) the most trusted man in America laughable. First, his show airs on a comedy channel, and second, if he is indeed the most trusted man in America then what does that say about America?
edit on 27-11-2011 by OptimusSubprime because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
I really should stop reading these OWS threads, they're full of right-wing idiots who don't understand the problems America faces, the typical contradictory hypocrites who scream aloud about the constitution while cheering on the macing cops.

Then you have all the idiots who believe what their nightly news tells them, while forgetting that the media refused to report this for over two weeks. And these people are supposedly still to be trusted? Most here seem to bash the MSM when it suits them, then swallow their BS and use it as "evidence" when it suits their argument too.

Once again, I think you'll find that the majority who support the OWS movement actually reads, listens, investigates and isn't a politically brainwashed zombie cheering for their side.
Those who speak out against it seem idiotic, lacking in the facts, repeating the propaganda, trusting in their right-wing ideals while never actually facing up to the problems society faces.

A good example of this is the constant suggestion by those against OWS that they're all "socialists" and want "hand outs".
These same people conveniently forget that the bankers have had handouts consistently over the last four years. They conveniently ignore that capitalism means the failure of a business that fails. They ignore the very definition of Fascism. They demand that all social welfare be removed while ignoring history and why these systems were put in place to begin with. They refuse to explain how they would care for their elderly, treat kids with cancer, educate the poor, or what they would do with the millions of homeless people the removal of such systems would create. They scream about "mixed messages" while ignoring the fact that there is more than one problem, and that there is no leadership behind an organic movement.

There's something pretty disgusting about an American who claims to love liberty, freedom, their constitution, all the while cheering on the baton wielding officer because they're beating up someone who looks different to them, has different political opinions and sees that something is very wrong with their country.

The very fact that so many people have been attacked by these "Police Officers" (and I use that term VERY LOOSELY) and there are still those out there who think there is not a problem is truly worrying.
Where's the patriotism when an Iraqi vet is almost killed at a protest? Where's the outrage that OAP's are being maced? Wheres the condemnation that the press are being restricted?
And these people STILL have the audacity to call themselves American.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:52 AM
link   
reply to post by OptimusSubprime
 


The NYPD tried that one on the very first instance of Police brutality against three girls on a sidewallk. They claimed that the footage was edited to only show their response.
You know what happened?
Another video was quickly released showing that incident from five different cameras, and more footage from an hour before that incident leading up to it. There's a video out there that follows the march from the start, up until they were attacked by the rabid NYPD.
The NYPD were proven to be lying.

You can check out plenty of footage on YT, and you can watch a lot of the protests live also.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 09:57 AM
link   
reply to post by OptimusSubprime
 


Sometimes it starts rolling when the police begin to break the law because people want to document it. Sometimes cameras have been recording previously but are cut to the reason for title of the video. Are you going to watch 15 minutes previous or even 5 minutes, 1 minute? I call it getting to the point.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 10:06 AM
link   
reply to post by Riffrafter
 


I think he missed the part where a woman at OWS was raped and a few others groped, when they reported to police they were told to take it to the General Assemblies so the safe zones were created and patrolled the heaviest by security groups to ensure their safety. LGBT people are everywhere are targeted by hate, with the inability to tell anyone to leave, the negligence of the NYPD this is what OWS did to protect people in order that they be abe to excercise their 1st Amendment rights.

He should probably at least look to see if his news sources are correct before regurgitating them.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 10:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by korathin
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I don't think it really matters. The OWS made their bed, let them rot in it. The reason why they are going after the OWS is because the OWS messed up and alienated anyone that wasn't an extreme leftist. Heck look at their "progressive caucus", and how racist and sexist it is. Basically a "progressive caucus" is if you have light colored skin+ a male genitalia you have to speak last if at all. I guess that fit's in well with all the male hating bigots and Caucasian hating bigots + all the self loathing mangina's that make up a certain percentage of OWS people.

They limited the amount of support they will ever receive because of their bigotry. So they where tolerated for a minute on the hopes that it would fizzle out on it's own. That hasn't happened because of how homogenous the group think is among OWS. There is kind of a group think cult mentally among OWS supporters and participants. That makes them highly dangerous in a very limited kind of way. Meaning if the OWS people were left alone they would eventually resort to terrorism or a Charles Manson like night of knife play.

Add all that together, and any outrage at how OWS are being treated won't last beyond 30 day's when they are all mopped up. Like I said, this course of events is a direct result of their stupidity and bigotry. Then again if they tried to appeal to a larger demography, they would of been shut down much more quickly with lethal level of force. That would of triggered a series of events which could of lead to a very real insurrection. So take it for what you will. But as it stands, OWS are just annoying squatters. The main risk with OWS, is that it fuels other, not so bigoted social movements. That would be very bad for the fascist/communist's/progressive/banker/NWO'ers.


Wow, watch a little more Fox why don't you...they give u your own show yet, or u just like repeating the misinfomation your fed?

The tea party bozos can disrupt every town hall meeting to the point of bringing business to a hault, and yet these people standing on a sidewalk deserve to be spit upon by those supposed to be there to protect your rights for free speach?

How about having a real discussion on the issues at hand, or has Fox brainwashed u to the point that anyone not quoting "O'Really" must be facist communist?

Wake up! Our country hasn't been a democracy for a long time now, and never will be again as long as the voices of the people continue to be drowned out by corporations lining our politicians pockets.
edit on 27-11-2011 by mutatismutandis because: (no reason given)
edit on 27-11-2011 by mutatismutandis because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by psyop911

by the way, anyone remembers julian assange and those radical
left rape victims?


Nope, just the charges that went nowhere.
Glad to know exactly what you fell for.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 10:35 AM
link   
As far as Im concerned, the only thing (the majority of) OWS has done has been acting like a bunch of victimized, spoiled children. This is coming from someone who doesn't even watch the MSM. I said it before: they made it easy to be ridiculed by the way they acted. Now i don't even agree with the Tea Party - well at least its most recent iteration, but at least they did it correctly. That's what OWS should have been (also minus the socialism).

The point is that they ruined all credibility they could have had, and sadly the credibility of some of their more intelligent ideas, by acting the way they did/are. They turned the public against them by occupying and trashing public spaces.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by KendraSins

Originally posted by psyop911

by the way, anyone remembers julian assange and those radical
left rape victims?


Nope, just the charges that went nowhere.
Glad to know exactly what you fell for.


i never trusted julian. but most of the ows?
they do trust julian.

so, how to weed fake activism with real one?
aks them about 9/11. that is the only litmus
test left nowadays.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual
I really should stop reading these OWS threads, they're full of right-wing idiots


there you go folks.
99 percent is more like 19 percent.

lol.



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 12:13 PM
link   
reply to post by korathin
 


The amount of television you must have watched to have non-existent categories ingrained within head and a false separation between other individuals who have common ideologies/goals in mind, quite frankly is unfathomable. If your inability to distinguish between common ideas and generalized beliefs is that bias then history will surely repeat itself and the Corporate CEO's coming to power will institute policy much worse than German Fascism of the 30's.
edit on 27-11-2011 by evolv because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   
While so many people in this thread are defending their positions to the death and being absolutely unable and unwilling to even consider the other sides opinion and facts I am on the outside of the fishbowl looking in and seeing exactly how this is all going to go down.

It isn't hard to see how a civil war could be ignited with soo many people divided.If these discussions are any indication, it has become clear to me that my neighbor will be more than willing to turn me in to the police/DHS
for expressing my support for the OWS movement and vocalizing my opinion that our government needs
to be overthrown.

These people who are so hellbent on defending the status quoe,.......
they are your neighbors,your bosses,your friends, your family.
YES, they will turn on your ass in a heartbeat real soon.
Soon, it will become a crime to identify with this domestic extremists/terrorist movement called OWS.
Then where will you be?

These people defending the status quoe are the ones you need to be worried about yet they have nothing to fear from us. We are trying to bring about positive change for the future and do you see what scathing attacks it evokes from people??????

It is amazing the things that are being said from them.
It literally sounds like I have my T.V. on and tuned into FOX if I read it aloud.
They don't aknowledge the fact that they are repeaters.
It is one thing to quote someone but quite another to not even have the decency to give proper credit.
Where I come from, that is called Plagarism.

Again, it is quite easy to peer into the future and see where this is all headed.





new topics
top topics
 
57
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join