Hmm, shades of sodom?
www.nytimes.com...
[...]
Ultra-Orthodox men and boys from the most stringent sects have hurled rocks and eggs at the police and journalists, shouting “Nazis” at the
security forces and assailing female reporters with epithets like “shikse,” a derogatory Yiddish term for a non-Jewish woman or girl, and
“whore.” Jews of varying degrees of orthodoxy and secularity headed to Beit Shemesh on Tuesday evening to join local residents in a protest
numbering in the thousands against religious violence and fanaticism.
Experts at torah can tell me perhaps: If being like the men and boys of sodom, means exactly what is described in the torah: The refusal of normal
sexual feelings towards females...
Then what is "anti-sodomy"?
Can't we say that "anti-sodom" behavior is more holy? Not the legal definition of sodomy which is blurred and non-scriptural. That is fraud. I
am referring to the actual biblical account of sodom where they had not just no desire for the females, but a loathing of them.
Mobs of men and boys? Really now, Abraham's children of ALL casts are truly jacked up. Time to get a grip on yourselves I'd say. Do not forget
the great Jew Hitler who advocated nudity!
Also do not forget that great lover of females named Mohammed, because I heard he had a real thing for girls like this. And I'd say that makes him
more holy. I am speaking from a 100% scriptural perspective of course.
Hmm let's see, Mohammed would marry a girl like this, whereas the ultra-kosher men would prefer to stone her. I think there is much hypocrisy
present. Let's get some real discussions going eh? Enough of this blaming the young for what the adults do. It's horse#.