It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by habfan1968
Nice, the box is science and how they tell us it is this or that and we have to believe them even though the pieces of the puzzle don't add up to what science is telling us so they change the picture on the box to match the puzzle they put together. Nice post OP.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by habfan1968
Nice, the box is science and how they tell us it is this or that and we have to believe them even though the pieces of the puzzle don't add up to what science is telling us so they change the picture on the box to match the puzzle they put together. Nice post OP.
You got that backwards. As phishyblankwaterspointed out. The one saying it has to be a duck, despite what evidence suggests,is the religious one.
The science bunny is the one saying he is not sure and works to come up with an answer....
It is interesting that you took it in the exact opposite manner in which it was meant to be taken though.
Originally posted by gabby2011
there is evidence that miracles have occured with prayer..which has left some doctors baffled.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by Schkeptick
I think humans have figured out the first 3 pieces of a 1,000 piece puzzle. We certainly don't know enough to think we can prove or disprove God.
Who is trying to disprove the existence of god? This is about creationism versus evolution and yes, we have more than enough pieces of the puzzle to rule out "creationism".
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by habfan1968
Nice, the box is science and how they tell us it is this or that and we have to believe them even though the pieces of the puzzle don't add up to what science is telling us so they change the picture on the box to match the puzzle they put together. Nice post OP.
You got that backwards. As phishyblankwaterspointed out. The one saying it has to be a duck, despite what evidence suggests,is the religious one.
The science bunny is the one saying he is not sure and works to come up with an answer....
It is interesting that you took it in the exact opposite manner in which it was meant to be taken though.
Originally posted by gosseyn
Don't you see that he inverted the story on purpose?
Originally posted by gosseyn
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by habfan1968
Nice, the box is science and how they tell us it is this or that and we have to believe them even though the pieces of the puzzle don't add up to what science is telling us so they change the picture on the box to match the puzzle they put together. Nice post OP.
You got that backwards. As phishyblankwaterspointed out. The one saying it has to be a duck, despite what evidence suggests,is the religious one.
The science bunny is the one saying he is not sure and works to come up with an answer....
It is interesting that you took it in the exact opposite manner in which it was meant to be taken though.
Don't you see that he inverted the story on purpose?
Originally posted by randomname
the Bible doesn't lie. if it says it's a duck, it's a duck. that sums up science, completely off track, clueless and trying to convince you a pond is a duck.
Last I checked it only affects people who know they are being prayed for
Originally posted by xxblackoctoberxx
reply to post by JoyDreamer
what is there to examine from religion? i just dont understand, claims are made and then through testing and the scientific method and what not we can see if these claims are true. i could make an outlandish claim about the miniature aliens that created us as pets and write a book about it and i don't see why it would hold any less merit than the bible or some other religious text.