posted on Nov, 25 2011 @ 04:09 PM
reply to post by blocula
When I first watched Vatican Assassins I felt the blast of truth as I listened to the evidence being presented. The Titanic was made of metal and the
layers of metal and the thickness that were presented means it was not a possibility for an iceberg to poke a hole in the ship - unless of course the
ship was heading directly towards the iceberg at full speed....
All I know is that the mere mention of Astor and his wealth and how the cabal/illuminati/whatever are so hell bent on maintaining their hold on the
finances of the globe, it starts to make sense. It is interesting to note that there was a catholic priest who boarded the Titanic and was assigned to
photograph people on board - he departed at the final port call before the ship sailed into open waters. Hmmm.
An iceberg on its own could not sink a ship with several layers of thick metal to penetrate. An iceberg scraping up alongside the ship as the Captain
tried to veer away from the icebergs - could not possible penetrate several layers of metal. Scrap off the outer layer - do some damage but sink the
ship - I don't think so. A ship that was travelling full steam ahead - straight into the iceberg - possibilities for damage start to emerge.
The cabal/illuminati/whatever and their connections make the sinking of the Titanic look a lot like one of their projects. They have no conscience
when it comes to killing innocent people and no conscience when it comes to lying and deception. They have the money and the means to buy people or to
make them disappear.
An iceberg - on its own - the more I ponder the thought the less likely it seems. Had the Titanic sailed too close to an avalanche of ice as a glacier
performed a spectacular breakaway - well the weight alone directly on top of the Titanic would have caused her to sink.
Keep sifting through the evidence as what we have been taught in school is mostly contrived. The truth is there we just have to uncover it and let it
see the light of day.