Looks like a moose or donkey taking a snooze behind some brush.
2nd line.

Really hard to tell.
Could be something there but, it looks like it's static. I didn't see it change at all.
Usually animals tend to look around, blink, and try and get a better view. This seemed like it was just there.
I can't make any conclusions mostly due to the quality.

I really can't get too excited about this video. As another person said, it appears to be static. I have a problem with not knowing why the camera is moving about so much, but whatever he is filming doesn't move at all.

For all I know,It could have been the head of a taxidermied bear set behind some bushes.

S&F for a "new" find, and good presentation.

is this a joke?

bigfoot? moose? leprechean? velocoraptor? as you can't see anything, could be anything.
whats the more likely explanation? a bigfoot?

I have no idea what is in the bush..There is something there for sure but im thinking a bear.Still its a interesting video ..thanks for the thread S&F peace,sugarcookie1

I agree with the previous member who stated the foliage looked non-indigenous to Arizona..just my opinion however...and even then, it could be someone transplanted stuff...having said that, terrible quality on the vid...If I thought it was Bigfoot I was filming, I would have made a bunch of noise to get it to move around and caught that on video...

Most video cameras have a stabilizing feature on them, do they not? Cannot make a determination what it is...I do not believe moose are indigenous to Arizona though...The furthest south they are confirmed is in Utah and Colorado...

The worst videographer I have seen. Can't hold the camera straight for two seconds...Intentionally as to not make out what is in the trees?
At first I thought it was a deer head looking towards him, but it is no deer. The trees look odd, almost tropical.
I do not think Moose have been reported that far south, Utah and Colorado were the lowest.
Maybe a private hunting preserve would have them.

Why didn't he move towards it to get it to move?

I first thought Buffalo, seemed to have that curliness to its facial hair.

There are plenty of green mountainous areas in the Flagstaff area. But it looks like a jack ass to me.

Originally posted by Destinyone
I really can't get too excited about this video. As another person said, it appears to be static. I have a problem with not knowing why the camera is moving about so much, but whatever he is filming doesn't move at all.

For all I know,It could have been the head of a taxidermied bear set behind some bushes.

S&F for a "new" find, and good presentation.

edit on 24-11-2011 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)

An animal or thing that would not want to be seen would not move. Something IS there.

Not sure exactly what that something is though.

At 2:54-55 you can see a small monkey to the left of the main figure. It moves and pulls its lips back and bares its teeth just like primates do.

At 2:57 You can see a face with a HUGE round nose. This looks like a badly done mask with something draped over the head to me;

I study cryptozoology creatures and animals. This does not fit any description I've ever heard of or seen of Bigfoot and kin. New species or???? My opinion.....guy/ gal in costume with monkey on shoulder. The teeth did it for me.

most convincing big foot footage I've ever seen.

if big foot was a bear in a bush

Did anyone else notice that this footage isn't the original? It has been filmed of another screen playing a youtube video. Just look at the bottom in the first few seconds as the footage starts.

First guess if it isn't a fake, is bear. I don't know why every critter in the woods is BF.

I was on the '08 BFRO PA expedition & there were suggestions made by folks (not BFRO) every time a sound was heard it was BF. I guess they never were in the woods in the dark? I digress..

This vid is most likely a bear.

Derek

since it's arizona i have no choice but to think it's an illegal alien hiding in a bigfoot costume.
border patrol don't look for bigfoot.