Most of the Oregon politicians acknowledge the police state dialogue and HLS' push for more control. Laws are going into place to protect certain
rights of its citizens.
Take for example the fact that Vera Katz, former Mayor of Portland, set a president for being the first to refuse to cooperate with federal
authorities in apprehending suspects in the "War on Terror". Certain suspects weren't released to the Feds.
Let's not forget Mohamed Osman Mohamud either! It was published on the front page of the Oregonian that Mohamed had been groomed by the Feds and
allegedly even purchased supplies from Federal agents. This was an obvious attempt to soften relations between the State and HLS and encourage Oregon
to work more closely with the Federal Government. As the truth of the mater surfaced you'd be surprised to even read about the mater now in MSM -
anywhere.
The stay of execution was intended to provide some measure of security to the accused. Listen to John Kitzhaber's comment, "The death penalty as
practised in Oregon is neither fair nor just, and it is not swift or certain. It is not applied equally to all.... It is a perversion of justice that
the single best indicator of who will and will not be executed has nothing to do with the circumstances of a crime or the findings of a jury."
This verbiage is very important and shouldn't be overlooked.
This completely strips the Federal Government of any powers of apprehending and
executing an Oregon Citizen based solely under the ambiguous title of "Terrorist". It is a perversion of justice when the single best
indicator of who will be executed is locked away in a secret dossier, unavailable for public scrutiny. Such suspects would have to be illegally
'kidnapped' without cooperation of local law enforcement. In fact, there are already rumors that California, Oregon and Washington police are
arresting Federal agents who "obstruct justice" during their investigations.
As in Ron Paul's statement during the CNN debate on HLS, he clarified that the new definition of 'terrorist' could include anyone. It is necessary
that other State legislature follow Oregon's lead to protect their citizens.
Unfortunately for HLS, the precautions that are being made in the best interest of The People are becoming blurred. The Feds have been messy lately.
In the process of providing National Security, the last thing the US Government needs now is to lose the trust of The People. The irony is that the
'real' terrorists will be hiding under the recent protections produced from the Feds continued bungling.
Unless the 'War on Terror' is clarified absolutely, and the corporate interests are separated from legislature and foreign policy, this struggle will
escalate out of control. Although I don't expect a civil war, I do expect to see future engaged confrontations between State and Federal agencies.
In time the definition of 'Terrorism' will be clarified. There is no choice since corporate interests will never be separated from State. The new
definition is the next logical step before blood is shed between the very agencies that are here to serve and protect The People. The definition
won't be 'The War on Corporations'.
The War on Terrorism will turn into a 'War on Religion' because that is the only aspect of the apparent problem that can be identified. For no
religion in any form has as strong of an influence as corporate interests. Religion is also the only 'label' that is non-racial and thereby still
fits the current population reduction goals.
edit on 24-11-2011 by CodeRed3D because: (no reason given)