posted on Nov, 24 2011 @ 08:27 AM
Originally posted by Tea4One
Ridiculous argument. So hungry, jobless, homeless people can't complain just because people in the same country have more wealth than they do in
others? Working along these lines...
Black people can't protest about being racially oppressed because its worse in South Africa.
Gay people can't protest about gay marriage laws because in the Middle East they're treated worse.
You're absurd. An oppressed people is still an oppressed people, wherever around the world it may be.
What's that flying past you? A bird? A plane? No, it's the point I am making.
I am angry at the sheer hypocrisy of people protesting about something, without realising that they are what they are protesting about.
For example:
A man starts a small cleaning company. Over a number of years, he works hard and builds it up. Eventually, he sells it for £10million. He is now,
by most standards rich, and one of the 1%, or minority. People protest about him being rich.
A member of the protest is a sales assistant, on £12k a year. She is not rich by the standards of the movement. However, on a global scale, she is
earning more per month than most in India and Chine (almost 1/3rd of the worlds population) among others, will earn in a year.
Should they protest about her 'wealth'?
Another member of the protest is unemployed, has never had a job and makes no effort to find one. He gets £10k in benefits a year (arbitrary number
used to illustrate my point, not the amount someone on benefits may or may not get a year). Again, far more than a large proportion of the worlds
population.
That sales assistant and the man on benefits are not oppressed, they aren't forced to spend 18 hours a day in a sweatshop, or living in fear of a
hail of machine gun fire. They might moan about how little they have, but their quality of life is far higher, and they have far more, than the
majority of the GLOBAL population.