It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Thus their boldness to play dangerous games that will harm our fellow brothers and sisters worldwide, example - in Syria, accesory to the henious murders of many innocent and unarmed fellow humans whom only pleaded for succour from the sufferings with their supposed leaders.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Instead of all that expense in arming that despotic leader with better missiles and military support
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Russian would have done better to spend it on socially alleviating the sufferings of our fellow human brothers and sisters in Russia whom had been suffering
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
encourage our brothers and sisters there, to make a stand
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
May Putin follow US example, and let freedom flourish
popsmayhem-
Aww boo-hoo Russia!!!
They don't have state of the art missile defense system
so there going to posture and bark and whine LIKE a 5 year old girl..
I would be mad too if my countries nukes couldn't do a damn thing
anymore to my enemy..
Originally posted by Blu82
reply to post by Xcathdra
isnt this all the same information Robert Hanson gave to the Russians?, From what ive read and the assumptions are rampid but the Russians have known exactly what we have thanks to him for some time now.
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Hardly "defensive"...
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Hardly "defensive"...
What part of "shield" is not defensive?
What part of "shield" do you see as offensive?
Since the missiles used are interceptors, please explain how they are offensive.
Thanksedit on 25-11-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)