It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Answer For "mad scientist"(Tibet)

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2004 @ 11:13 PM
link   
What happened on native indians in northern america and what happens in Chinese Tibet, they are totally different.

Whiteman murdered most native indians and took their land, because you don't regard indians as human being, just like "red evil". Today, whiteman feel guilty about what they have done on native indians, you guys want to do something to atone for your crime. (I think you guys should go back Europe, northern america is native indians' home, not yours). You also think Chinese goverment did the same thing on Tibet people, you guys want to protest Chinese goverment, to free Tibet to decrease your guilty. But you are totally wrong, Chinese is different with whiteman, you are wild animal, we are overcivilized nation, we treat all different race with "ren" (human love), not weapon. That's the reason, Chinese civilization has survived over 5000 years.

I don't want to waste my time to argue with you, just give you one fact : * In america, if one of your parent is black, and one is white, if it allows you to choose you are white or black, be honest, tell me what you will choose? * In China, if one of parents is minority and one is "Han" (over 90% Chinese are Han race, majority), most children will choose minority race, not "Han". * You want to ask me why? because China doesn't has minority discrimination.

Tibet is part of China, just like New Mexico is part of united state of america. Tibet people and "Han" people are both offspring of "Huang De". Tibet highland became a part of China from Chinese Yuan Dynasty (Mongolia Empire, Capital is Beijing), about 800 years ago, before whiteman found new world :-). Chinese central goverment lost control of this highland during Chinese Ming Dynasty (1368 - 1644), but the last Chinese Dynasty, Qing (1644 - 1911) built a solid control on Tibet, Dalia and Banchan Lama (I know you just hear Dalia, not idea about Banchan lama, he is equal to Dalia, but he doesn't live in Lasa, his domain covers northern part of Tibet and Qinghai Provience. Dalia and Banchan are teach for each other) both of them are chosen by the Tibet Three Great Temple under Chinese central government supervision, and offically nominated by Bejing government to be Dalia and Banchan Lama to govern Tibet.

To tell you a truth, the 14th Dalia Lama was nominated by Chinese Centrol government in 1937. As you guys said, Tibet is a free country, why its leader has to be offically anominated by Chinese government, just like Elizabeth Queen to nominate Governor-General of Hongkong. Before 1997, you guys never said Hongkong is a free country, right? why you are talking about Tibet a free country ? It never been a free country from 1644, it just a part of the huge Chinese Empire.

For protecting right to free trading opium, the Victoria queen of democracy, civilization British sent Navy to invade Chinese and force Chinese government to cede Hongkong in 1840s. This is just a start of horrible dream for China, from then, Russian took 1.5 million square kilo land from China, then soviet union force Chinese government accepted Mongolia to be independent country (1.7 million square km). American Navy invaded Chinese Taiwan in 1950 after korean war breaken, but before Chinese volunteer army was invited by People's republic of korea government to get into Northern Korean to protect water dam. American intercepted Chinese united process in 1950s. Chinese people not only lost land, but also suffer Japanese atrocity, japanese evil from 1931 to 1945, killed about 30 million Chinese!!! japanese king was not been punished, japanese army was not been punished, japanese fasces was not been punished.

Let me tell you something, we Chinese has suffered so much, we know the pain, we won't do that on any other nation. But we have to prevent this happend again on China, we won't give up on inch land to any county, no matter American, Russian, Japan etc.

If you think Tibet, Taiwan are free country, come to take them from Chinese people!!!! haha, you can not, that doesn't mean you don't want to take them, just because you don't have the ability to take them, 2004 China is not 1840s China, not 1931 China, not 1945 China. We are chairman Mao Zedong's China, we have strong central goverment to lead our county, we have brave and advanced army to protect our country.

If you forget the lesson your grandfather got from Korean War, Vietnam War, you guys can try it.


[edit on 5-9-2004 by John bull 1]




posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 06:36 AM
link   
it's really an honest post which has answered many concept that many westen friends are confused in.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 08:36 AM
link   
ZZZZZZZZZZZ same arguments posted in other forums. One of the main differences is that New Mexico chose to be a state. Tibet did not choose to be invaded, raped, pillaged and murdered. Geee your right they are different.

Victor I like you, at least your propaganda is a bit different (not that much) from others who seem to read from the same Chinese Ministry of Propaganda manual. Did you get a new edition?




posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 08:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by FredT
ZZZZZZZZZZZ same arguments posted in other forums. One of the main differences is that New Mexico chose to be a state. Tibet did not choose to be invaded, raped, pillaged and murdered. Geee your right they are different.

Victor I like you, at least your propaganda is a bit different (not that much) from others who seem to read from the same Chinese Ministry of Propaganda manual. Did you get a new edition?


haha,
so joking.
in your mind, Chinese provide for a special group to post in the American forum following a special manual ?

i'm not a officer but only say sth. standing on my own position
i'm a Electronic Engineering bachelor. we can intercourse some of EE if you like.

footnote: wish i won't be registered by the fbi.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 10:14 AM
link   
accutly my wifes mother had a child with a black man and he and we all consider him black even though hes light brown.
and being from florida most people who have white and black mix consider them selfs black even up to the point where they look more white.
but consider this our races colors are NOT black or white as the amount of light assurbed by the skin is what makes it look a certian color.
the darker your skin is the MORE light waves are reflected back the lighter the more light waves are assurbed.
Consider this there is NO white Or black but a certian leavel of the light spectrum that is assurbed and reflected . the color you see in a objuct is the amount of certian colors reflecting BACK .TRUE black is all visiable colors reflected 100% back and true white is all colorse assurbed 100%.
now me personly that makes me a mix of purple green red yellow orange and ever other wave langth of light im NOT white OR black .and have never met anyone who is .Even though albinos are the closest to true white you can get. And rember albinos are a genitic fluk.



posted on Sep, 5 2004 @ 10:26 AM
link   


He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
United States Declaration of Independence

(The "He" is King George)

Our country was founded on the hatred of native Americans.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join