Tonight! Nov. 22/11: CNN Republican National Security Debate - 8pm EST, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 22-11-2011 @ 08:55 PM by ModernAcademia
reply to post by JacKatMtn



Well after the middle of the debate he got too little spotlight
I guess he had to prolong whatever he had


reply posted on 22-11-2011 @ 08:58 PM by JacKatMtn
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Still his best showing... and actually the most airtime..

I just wish he would have ended on the point using the Wolfiwitz deal...





Perry is clueless.. calling CHina out and using Reagan to do it?

facepalm for the TX Gov..

missed the last few shaking my haed at Perry's words...


reply posted on 22-11-2011 @ 09:13 PM by JacKatMtn
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Keeping with the animal analogy..

Newt is a WOLF in sheep's clothing

IMO He's just a part of the problem... he may try to distance himself from the current govt, but in essence, he's never left, I think he pocketed over 1 mil from Fannie or Freddie as a consultant..

I am actually believing that we are looking at Obama Part II,, which is OK as long as Congress is overhauled..

NOTHING will change unless the voters change CONGRESS..


reply posted on 22-11-2011 @ 09:25 PM by JacKatMtn
reply to post by SmashPapayaKC






I was going to rebut you, but since you are on a firm stance, I'll just thank you for sharing your thoughts on this debate


reply posted on 22-11-2011 @ 09:32 PM by Wookiep
reply to post by SmashPapayaKC



Very good assessment. I missed the first 30 min tho. I really genuinely think this was one of Pauls best debates from what I have seen. I saw him him speak more in an hour and a half (or so) than any other debate so far. Because of this, he was allowed to finally show why he is the only candidate worth voting for. I have to give CNN at least a little props for making this fairer than the 89 seconds CBS gave Paul in their live televised segment.

I truly believe since the CBS debate, the media is worried that the people really are getting angry and tired of it. There were some things that were still shady tonight from the media, but this time they even gave him talking points after the debate.
edit on 22-11-2011 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-11-2011 @ 01:19 AM by mishigas
reply to post by Ghost375



Ron Paul is 100% right about our drug policies.
Legalize them. As he said, "Prescription drugs kill more people than illegal drugs."


Prescribed drugs (legal drugs) kill more people than illegal drugs do.

Therefore, we should legalize all drugs. Then all drugs will kill more people.

So THAT'S the piece of Ron Paul's philosophy I've been missing! Now it all makes perfect sense!:

You did well when you defended Romney on that genocide remark. Then, afraid of peer pressure, you succumbed to RP apology tactics. Man up! Think for yourself!
edit on 23-11-2011 by mishigas because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-11-2011 @ 01:30 AM by mishigas
reply to post by JacKatMtn




I do wish someone would ponder why the US is so busy allegedly helping folks across the globe and yet, our next door neighbor who is obviously being overrun by criminal elements, gets no US help? at least the kind of help they need to regain control of their country?


I can think of several reasons:

1) The Mexican gov't is complicit with the US as far as (not) controlling illegal aliens crossing the border at will

2) The Mexican gov't is in bed with the drug cartels

Even Ron Paul refuses to help, with his less-than-enthusiastic support for E-Verify.


reply posted on 23-11-2011 @ 01:36 AM by mishigas
reply to post by ModernAcademia



What's with Newt and his Local Church argument on illegal immigration?

If you have lived here for many years and are part of a local church then you can stay here.


That one surprised me. It almost smacked of a certain naivete or innocence, a belief that any illegal that has been here for a certain period of time has made attempts at being assimilated into our culture by joining the local church, etc. Nice thought, but...


reply posted on 23-11-2011 @ 01:47 AM by mishigas
reply to post by eLPresidente



reply to post by mishigas

no, you've been missing a whole lot more than that.


On second though, you're right. I've never heard a good argument on why it's OK for 12 yo's to spike a vein under Ron Paul's kingdom. Perhaps you can enlighten me?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags