Why don't we have representation like this in the USA?
To break this down, apparently some lawmakers in South Korea are against this free trade agreement because it would hand jurisdiction of certain
matters to a US court.
So disputes or crimes perpetrated by investors on South Korean SOVEREIGN land would be handled by an international arbitration panel rather than local
authorities. It makes sense to me that lawmakers would like their legal institutions to have the final say on legal matters within the country.
There is also concern that the trade agreement favors US workers over South Korean workers. I have not read the agreement and don't have a solid
understanding of exactly what it entails, but it seems honorable to me that a man would risk so much trying to protect his country and countrymen -
here in the US lawmakers seemingly promote outsourcing our jobs and allowing international bodies to have an active role in US government policy.
So while it might seem like a debacle, and I'm sure the media will eventually paint it that way, I for one commend Kim Seon-dong for his patriotic
acts. What do you think ATS? Should American lawmakers be more willing to risk their reputations and livelihood to protect their constituents? What do
you think would happen if a member of Congress exploded tear gas in Congress to block, say, the Patriot Act? Hero or rogue?
www.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

