Goldman Sachs *is* The Federal Government - The Venn Diagram

page: 2
144
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
Goldman Suchs (sic)
Their "name" says it.




posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Jason88
 


I would love to use your Venn diagram on an article for my website www.govcorporation.com It fits in well with my current book I am working on that will be developed from the site and its contributors. I will of course link to your original materials and credit you.

S$F thanks for the thread.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:24 PM
link   
The Venn Diagram is definitely a very powerful tool. However, it becomes pretty messy when multiple relationships exist between several entities. There is a really great site that shows the intricacies of these kinds of relationships:

news.muckety.com...



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
And that is just Goldman Sachs. Nice job. But it isnt surprising. High debt means high profit for the banks. Is it any wonder, that the bushes raised the naitonal debt through the ceiling? Who do you think sponsored them?


Only one of those was Bush, two were Clinton, and all the rest were Obama.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:38 PM
link   
Someone was bound to do it...Why not me?

Advanced Venn Diagram of US Government Conflicts of Interest:




posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by wayouttheredude
reply to post by Jason88
 


I would love to use your Venn diagram on an article for my website www.govcorporation.com It fits in well with my current book I am working on that will be developed from the site and its contributors. I will of course link to your original materials and credit you.

S$F thanks for the thread.


Ha! I'd love to see that diagram on a giant billboard. When OWS stops suggesting socialism I will join them.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   
This is fantastic. Could you post a larger simple black and white version, not just a gray scale, so we can print it out and distribute it? Thanks in advance for saving me the time.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:54 PM
link   
Yep.. and who is Mitt Romney's top contributor? Yeesh..

Mitt Romney's Top Contributors



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by bacci0909
 


Looks like Romney will be the next President. Unless the other Bankster puppet Gingrich's media fabricated rise in the polls means anything. ~SheopleNation

edit on 21-11-2011 by SheopleNation because: TypO



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by JimmyNeutron
 


Thanks for that. I had to go and do a Muckety Map for Ron Paul just to test out their system. I got a pretty interesting result of the congressman and his connections. Check it out. www.truthisthenews.com...



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptChaos
 


Actually since the Federal Reserve was appointed by the beginning of the last century their protégé has been infiltrating the government through the years, more so in the last few decades after Regan gave away our government to corporate America in a silver platter with his trickle down economics.

Goldman Sach is just another entity behind the powers that runs the government.

They recycle their trash (I mean their minions, sorry their alumni) from government to government.

Just look what they are doing now to the EU. The same powers behind the EU and the central banks runs the Federal Reserve they have been at it for over a century.

So actually it doesn't matter who is elected president in America they run the nation no matter what



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 07:02 PM
link   
Goldman Sachs. Hmmmmm...two Jews that control one of the largest banks in the world. Let me see, the jews control the banks, they control the media, they control the United States Government, they control the military. No, there is no zionist cabal here, right?



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 09:10 PM
link   
This is exactly what Ayn was talking about.. the need for separation of state and economics.



b
edit on 21-11-2011 by Bspiracy because: I suck at pasting correct vid id's



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 09:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Captain Beyond
Goldman Sachs. Hmmmmm...two Jews that control one of the largest banks in the world. Let me see, the jews control the banks, they control the media, they control the United States Government, they control the military. No, there is no zionist cabal here, right?


No. You may feel inclined to characterize this as a matter of some generations-old fractious conspiracy based on faith, or even some bizarre quasi-racial-fixation. I strongly disagree.

In the final analysis this is about royalty.

It used to be we were ignorant enough about the universe to believe that if the right person said "Me and mine are your sovereigns" followed by the right person saying "God says so" we had no choice but to believe those self-entitled groups were never to be questioned and treated with deference and near worship.

We grew up.

Now they've successfully replaced "God" with "money" (which doesn't even really exist anymore... it's all "virtual".. it's all debt.) They took our wealth and are holding it hostage to redefine "royalty" in the economic terms that suits them.

Frankly, you are entitled to your opinion... as I confess mine is as well...But I prefer mine for a very simple reason.... many people "opt-in" and contribute to the problem voluntarily - for profit... they come in all colors, creeds, nationalities, and genders... the problem is lust for wealth, power, and vainglory.

Attributing this to something which is as much a construct as 'Federal Reserve" notes is ineffective... we should have learned that lesson from history by now.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by blamethegreys
Someone was bound to do it...Why not me?

Advanced Venn Diagram of US Government Conflicts of Interest:



This would have been great if only you had left out the political shilling for Ron Paul



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   
I reject Rand's Objectivism in that it, in and of itself, is a rejection of the beauty of the human condition. That beauty is not sprung from value judgements... it is NOT rational. That rationality that justifies the exclusion of those who simply 'do not meet my judgement of virtue or value' is necessarily a surrender to the bleak and sometimes frightening nature of the solitude of the human experience.

One could live their lives according to a Randesk mentality, if one were willing to forgo the need for others. Perhaps many people do not need others, perhaps it suits them to look upon all persons outside themselves as a piece of furniture, metaphorically speaking, but I find no beauty in that life. Most parents, often gifted with an unexpected moment of beauty from their children soon realize, that life can be beautiful and if we don't nurture that beauty, who will? The state? Cold logic? Religion?

I say no. It is OUR task to nurture the beauty in life. Objectivism is a mental exercise - and that is pre-positioned to accommodate those narcissists and sociopaths who enjoy reinforcing elitism, strikes me as a very telling bull weather of what one could expect from a society embracing such a philosophy.
edit on 21-11-2011 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 09:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Jason88
 


I could'nt agree more with your premise, it's all in who you know. At the top of both political parties it's the same group. That's why it does'nt matter who you vote in to office nothing ever changes.



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 10:18 PM
link   
Blah Blah Blah, Goldman SACKS.....

You want some real knowledge???? Why not research the ACT OF 1871????????

EDIT:

Or this should clarify it for you:
www.law.cornell.edu...

USC Title 28 3002 - (15)

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
edit on 21-11-2011 by YoungBloodNews because: Truth BOMBS



posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 11:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maxmars

One could live their lives according to a Randesk mentality, if one were willing to forgo the need for others.


I'll seize on that sentence since it's not what I gather she was talking about.
freedom for internal growth unregulated by the state and vanity sprung from a capitalistic social structure is what she was talking about.
She was married, spoke emphatically towards personal growth which leads to social support for others without the pressure of being obligated to support others before obtaining the ability to support ones self internally.

The diagram pointedly exercises the gross distortion of influence a few people have over millions through regulation.
separate the church, state and economy for the harmony that would spring forth since people growing up would learn their OWN actions determine the future instead of the diagrams occupants determining it for them.

I don't agree with her completely, but the diagram does highlight her warnings with historical eloquence.

sort of like Ron Paul saying "make all drugs legal since the general population would reject them"
OR make laissez-faire the norm and as a society we would find a way to balance the resources instead of letting others gorge themselves on the drug of economic power backed by the "law" of the state.

b



posted on Nov, 22 2011 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Jason88
 


Very Interesting Post.

Nice to see that some ATS"s still understand Greatist Common Factors, Least Common Denominators,
Subsets,and Venn Diagrams. Excellent integration of simplicity.

S&F to your post. I think I'll add you as a friend as well.



top topics
 
144
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join