It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Phasing Out Cash & Independence The techniques used in the fourth step is exactly the same used in the past in the USSR to force the people to accept Communism. The same technique will be used by the United Nations to implement the new world religion and the new world order. A lot of people ask when this is going to happen and how they will accomplish the visions of the Night of a Thousand Stars, and the events that will point to the days when it will begin. According to the many reports we have received, we believe it will begin with some kind of worldwide economic disaster. Not a complete crash, but enough to allow them to introduce some kind of in-between currency before they introduce their electronic cash to replace all paper or plastic money. The in-between currency will be used to force anyone with savings to spend or turn in their cash because they understand that people who have money and are not dependent upon them might be the very ones who will mount an insurrection against them. If everyone is broke, no one can fund a war of any kind: paper currency will cease to exist. This is one of the first signs.
There are some positives that may arise from a system devoid of paper money. Bank robberies would be a thing of the past. It would be impossible to buy illegal drugs. Don't underestimate how much of our children's (and parent's) money go towards buying marijuana and other drugs. Muggings would decrease if there's little to be gained from them. I think greed may dwindle a bit, as seeing numbers on screen doesn't feel as empowering as holding a large stack of bills in your hand. People may start to see money for what it really is - a means to an end - rather than an object that buys anything at anytime, regardless of the harm it may do to yourself and others. Physical money is also very dirty, although I'm not sure how much illness it actually causes. People could always resort to old fashioned bartering if they needed to. There are many negatives, as I'm sure people will and have pointed out, but there are some positives as well.
Originally posted by musicalmirrors
There are some positives that may arise from a system devoid of paper money.
Bank robberies would be a thing of the past. It would be impossible to buy illegal drugs. Don't underestimate how much of our children's (and parent's) money go towards buying marijuana and other drugs. Muggings would decrease if there's little to be gained from them. I think greed may dwindle a bit, as seeing numbers on screen doesn't feel as empowering as holding a large stack of bills in your hand. People may start to see money for what it really is - a means to an end - rather than an object that buys anything at anytime, regardless of the harm it may do to yourself and others. Physical money is also very dirty, although I'm not sure how much illness it actually causes. People could always resort to old fashioned bartering if they needed to.
There are many negatives, as I'm sure people will and have pointed out, but there are some positives as well.
Originally posted by lbndhr
In USA banks require current photo I.d plus social security card. In Texas to get a legal photo .i.d you need a photo I.d a birth certificate a social security card and proof of residence, like a utility bill or bank statement. This is a viscous circle. I been a resident in Texas 4 years I refuse to change my I.d-driver license.
Public Law-93-579 (Section 7)
Name and address of Citizen Name and address of Notice Recipient
Citizen’s statement: I certify that the forgoing information stated here is true and correct. Citizen’s signature Date Legal Notice of Warning:
Federal law provides that it is a crime to violate the Rights of a citizen under the color-of-law. You can be arrested for this crime and can also be held personally liable for civil damages.
Federal Law, Section 7 of Public Law 93-579 provides that:
"It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State or local government agency to deny to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such individual’s refusal to disclose his social security account number."
Federal courts have ruled the Privacy Act applies equally to the private sector.
Warning, you are in violation of Federal Law and persisting with your demand may lead to your arrest and/or civil damages!
The law provides that you can be held personally responsible and liable, as well as your company or agency. There is no law requiring an individual to obtain or use a social security number. Your requirement and/or demand that I provide a social security number to you is a violation of one or more of the following laws: 4 CFR 83.9; 5 USC Sec. 552a; 7 CFR 1.123; 7 USC Sec. 2204g; 14 CFR 1212.604; 17 CFR 249.501a; 19CFR 118.11; 19 CFR 122.25; 19 CFR 24.5; 24 CFR 5.212; 28 CFR 16.53; 28 CFR 513.31; 28 CFR 700.25; 29 CFR 70a.10; 29 CFR 71.12; 31 CFR 1.32; 31 CFR 501.806; 32 CFR 270.19; 32 CFR 310.20; 32 CFR 311.5; 32 CFR 316.6; 32 CFR 317.20; 32 CFR 323.5; 32 CFR 505.2; 32 CFR 701.108; 32 CFR 806b.9; 38 CFR 1.575; 38 CFR 3.216; 38 USC Sec. 5101; 39 CFR 266.4; 45 CFR Part 801; 47 CFR 0.554; 49 CFR 10.29.
You are advised to cease and desist with your demand and to seek personal legal counsel if you do not understand the law. Notice of Service: I, certify that I personally delivered this notice to above named recipient and address on at:
(name of recipient)
42 USC Sec. 408 provides that: "Whoever ... (8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States; shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both."
18 USC §242 and 42 USC §1983 provides that: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;" 42 USC §1983 further provides that a violator "shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress."
Originally posted by daryllyn
[color=mediumorchid]I have been hearing this same scenario since 1995.
Second.
Originally posted by gabby2011
Originally posted by daryllyn
[color=mediumorchid]I have been hearing this same scenario since 1995.
Second.
and so its wrong? Is that what your smart ass answer implicated?..
that because you can't see what been coming down the pike for over 20 years , you're smarter than the rest ?edit on 21-11-2011 by gabby2011 because: (no reason given)