It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Doesn't change the fact that it's a start and pretty much everyone pro and anti Occupy, have agreed that it needs to include more groups.
I agreed with Beez that it should include unions, pac's, special interest groups, lobbyists, etc etc.
So what are you complaining about?
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
I do read and understand. I did read what you guys pointed out. Hence why I said it needs work, but the surface idea is sound.
You come off kind of obnoxious when you attempt to condescend. Your fears are the extreme exaggeration of every possible negative scenario. You aren't right and neither is someone that would blindly follow the bill. The stated goal of it is a good thing. It's just the omission of other groups and one vagueness of the business ban that make it undesirable. With some tuning it would be a good thing.
Originally posted by brice
reply to post by seachange
Martha's B @ B ain't gonna be donatin' nuttin', it's going to be the owner of that B @ B donating $5000.00 to the candidate of their choice, nothing wrong with that, Just like the stockholders of corporations (not the corps.) can donate to the candidate of their choice.....get it?
brice
So read that carefully and then compare it with your comment. Its not possible for Martha, who happens to own Marthas B&B to donate $5,000 to Ron Paul without Martha's B&B also having donated $5,000 to Ron Paul.
A sole proprietorship, also known as the sole trader or simply a proprietorship, is a type of business entity that is owned and run by one individual and in which there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by LazyGuy
Let's see:
Democrat: Ban corporate money and take away corporate "personhood"
Republican:Occupy crowd should take a bath and get a job
Many ATSers: Both parties are the same.
Originally posted by links234
Progressive Republicans helped cause the depression with their free-market ideology stemming from old-fashioned liberalism(yes, liberals during the 1920's believed, whole-heartedly, in free markets). Every president from 1921 to 1933 were Republicans. Every congress was Republican majority (super-majorities in some years). Now we have conservative Republicans trying to do the same thing 80 years later.
Sure, progressives were partly responsible for the great depression. However, progressives of the 1920's would be considered conservatives of the 2000's based solely on their economic views.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by xuenchen
The rules would be written that would ban a private individual working on the behest of a corporation from being allowed to donate to a campaign, say you work for I don't know, Halliburton, your boss would be banned from giving you money to donate on behalf of them that would make the donation appear like if it came from you. That is a backdoor donation which would also be banned!