It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Propulsion
I call it living to ones means. People want their cake and eat it too. Can’t have everything in life because someone else has it. If you want something, than do what it takes to obtain it. Don’t expect anyone to give it to you for free. I so dislike the pity trips! Stand up and take control of your life! I went from an I.S. position that paid me 90k a year to a warehouse position unloading trailers for close to nothing. I don’t run around pouting like a baby! I had 130k in student loans. Paid them all off! There was a time in my life where I was down and out living on streets! I chose not to be there and made changes! In my opinion, some people are just too lazy! And then they cry about it when things don’t work out the way they want them too! I know everyone is not the same, but I also know everyone can do or be anything they want in life! My grandmother made a career change when she turned 62 years old. She hated her prior work and wanted to find happiness. She has no regrets…
Originally posted by peck420
reply to post by undo
So it is everybody else's fault but yours?
Second.
“Nevertheless, the argument indicates this, if we would be happy, to be the path along which we should proceed. With a view to concealment we will establish secret brotherhoods and political clubs. And there are professors of rhetoric who teach the art of persuading courts and assemblies; and so, partly by persuasion and partly by force, I shall make unlawful gains and not be punished. Still I hear a voice saying that the gods cannot be deceived, neither can they be compelled. But what if there are no gods? or, suppose them to have no care of human things --why in either case should we mind about concealment? And even if there are gods, and they do care about us, yet we know of them only from tradition and the genealogies of the poets; and these are the very persons who say that they may be influenced and turned by ‘sacrifices and soothing entreaties and by offerings.’ Let us be consistent then, and believe both or neither. If the poets speak truly, why then we had better be unjust, and offer of the fruits of injustice; for if we are just, although we may escape the vengeance of heaven, we shall lose the gains of injustice; but, if we are unjust, we shall keep the gains, and by our sinning and praying, and praying and sinning, the gods will be propitiated, and we shall not be punished.” -Plato, The Republic, Book II
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
Originally posted by peck420
Originally posted by whaaa
What part of this do people not get. If a business has no buyers it is no longer a business.
The sellers and the government can play whatever games they want, if people buy they are condoning the game. If people stop buying they are out of business.
And what you fail to get is that ordinary people can't boycott and stop buying. They are dependent on the basic necessities of life. Food, fuel, shelter. The businesses can wait a lot longer than you think they can. I throw up the false shortages as proof. ex. oil shortage to drive up prices.
www.jimbernard.org...
price fixing is a reality you seem unaware of.
www.marketmanipulation.com...
In today business world...information is power and academics is BS.
edit on 19-11-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Equidae
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Equidae
especially when all a business degree gives you are people/manipulation skills.
I do have to disagree with you there. My minor was Business Management, and you have to take econ and accounting as basic courses, then there is at least one course in management style learning about Taylor etc, types of corporations and how they operate, branding of product, making up business plans, etc. Project Management could also be considered people skills to some degree, but it's really maintaining a project of production start to finish with timelines etc. It's even offered as a complete area of concentration all by itself.
You're right. I'm a science major, and we tend to get a bit snobby about so called "soft" degrees
Yes, I am also a science major, but my minor is Bus Management. There is nothing "soft" about accounting techniques and many people do not pass the CPA exam first time around.
I do think, however, that many Universities build in "soft" courses to all their degrees to make everyone a bit more well rounded(or maybe it's social engineering).
IT people are notorious for not being people-oriented, and a good network manager is now expected to have at least some soft skills. (otherwise, how could they be expected to talk the CFO into building the new VoIP upgrade into the annual budget)edit on 19-11-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 19-11-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jimnuggits
A four year moratorium on college and trade school fees, with an equal opportunity to receive food and shelter and clothing is exactly what we need. Educate, feed, clothe and shelter everyone for four years, with education in manufacturing radiant energy technologies, infrastructure engineering, and the Arts being heavily promoted. The money we will save letting the banks fail will more than pay to provide all of this for every American. And, after four years, watch the innovation and advancement thrive...
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
Can someone explain something i saw on tv last night. I caught a part of "children in need", (british charity tv extravaganza and charity). There was a piece on poor families and poverty. Now, as a single mum who works, struggles but survives i am fully aware of how increasingly difficult it is to manage in the current economic climate. There was a family featured, who lived in a poor area of england, in a flat that was damp, apparantly sometimes the children went without supper, and the poor little lad in the family got bullied in school because he only had his sisters old school girl shirts to wear to school. Now i dont understand this, i have seen school shirts in charity shops for a £1, in fact some local authorities give grants to low income families to help with the purchase of uniforms. Secondly, i dont see why a child has to go without a hot meal in the evening. A loaf of bread with 20 plus slices is 50p, a can of beans approx 30p. For 50p theres two evening meals there. A ten kilo bag of spuds is £2 in lidl, thats about 50 jacket potato meals, I dont see how any children should GO WITHOUT an evening meal. And the irony was, as he was telling the camera about what a struggle his families life was, he was playing on his x-box.
I am a socialist, i hope i always will be, but i just dont understand this.
And ridiculously, with regards to poverty, i would be significantly better off if i didnt work, and would get more help (hand outs).