It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Do me a favor. The next time you go to post something scroll to the top of the page and read what it says.
Deny Ignorance......Please. I didn't join ATS to see this crap. Isn't the Occupy Movement at heart something we all wanted? I wanted something like this to happen BADLY. I can tell you, when I got into "conspiracy theories/fact" I wanted The People to take to the streets in the worst way. I wanted us, as a people, to be united and fight for whats right. The only thing I think that would improve the Movement is if the focus was on the Federal Reserve. Everything, We the People, denounce stems from the Federal Reserve. They are the 4th branch of government that doesn't adhere to checks and balances.
545 People Responsible for America's Woes by Charley Reese Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices - 545 human beings out of the 300 million - are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton- picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Drezden
I refer you to this video which shows the protestors yelling (denouncing), and physically pulling the unruly protestors away from the man.
That video actually does more harm than good for your argument.
And then it was denounced later by those that found out.
As it should be.
It demonstrates the lack of a cohesive message and lack of leadership.
Originally posted by Drezden
reply to post by SLAYER69
Who on ATS is speaking on behalf of OWS? I haven't seen anyone do that? As you've pointed out it is leaderless, so those that are speaking on behalf of OWS, especially on ATS..
Originally posted by Drezden
That video is the worst/violent/aggressive OWS has been. In the video no one was hurt, the protestors vocally and physically denounce the actions of that very small handful of people who were vandalizing and harassing. Oakland has had more negative OWS moments than any other city.
I can watch a video of a U.S. soldier throwing a puppy or shooting a civilian.. does that mean I believe U.S. soldiers as a whole are terrorists, violent and cruel? No I don't..
but with the poor logic you use, that connection could easily be made.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Yet, YOU and others here are attempting that very thing, by posting what is or isn't the movements cause, stance and beliefs...
Right?
Originally posted by Drezden
No what I'm saying is fact based on OWS itself, the people are not in the streets demanding violent revolution, that isn't what they are chanting.
The movement is called Occupy Wall street, when the date was set to protest it was self described as being against the corporate greed that has ruined our economy.. people initially came to the protests with this specific reason in mind.
What is false and pretending to be spokespeople for the protest are YOU and people like you are taking small isolated incidents and stating them as the goals and values of the movement.
According to the ATS criticizers the movement has all these malicious intentions, socialist or communist one day.. then the next day it's anarchist (even though those ideologies are at extreme odds with each other)
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Drezden
That video is the worst/violent/aggressive OWS has been. In the video no one was hurt, the protestors vocally and physically denounce the actions of that very small handful of people who were vandalizing and harassing. Oakland has had more negative OWS moments than any other city.
You're the one who posted it and now you're trying to dismiss it
I can watch a video of a U.S. soldier throwing a puppy or shooting a civilian.. does that mean I believe U.S. soldiers as a whole are terrorists, violent and cruel? No I don't..
No and neither do I beleive it represnts the whole either but like the instances you brought up about puppies and cilvilians. THAT was discussed to death and was the object of much debate here at ATS.
but with the poor logic you use, that connection could easily be made.
I'll just let that sit there as example of your tactics.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Drezden
No what I'm saying is fact based on OWS itself, the people are not in the streets demanding violent revolution, that isn't what they are chanting.
Yet, There are those doing that very thing.
Right?
The movement is called Occupy Wall street, when the date was set to protest it was self described as being against the corporate greed that has ruined our economy.. people initially came to the protests with this specific reason in mind.
I have no issues with that at ALL!
What is false and pretending to be spokespeople for the protest are YOU and people like you are taking small isolated incidents and stating them as the goals and values of the movement.
I'm calling you out here.
Where have I ever said they represents the whole or are the goals and values of the movement.?
According to the ATS criticizers the movement has all these malicious intentions, socialist or communist one day.. then the next day it's anarchist (even though those ideologies are at extreme odds with each other)
Hence the lack of a "Cohesive message" by OWS supporters.
Can you read what I'm typing here?
Is my keyboard working?
Let's see..
Type
Type
Type
Hmmm... seems to be working!
edit on 20-11-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Drezden
Oh boy, you're back to trolling already, we can't just have a respectful mature debate.
Please stop making assumptions and putting words in my mouth.
Originally posted by Drezden
Or will this actually make you realize that you are in fact generalizing an entire group based on the actions of the few within the group.
reply to post by SLAYER69
Well I'm not a Tea Party member and I have been outspoken and critical of "some" of the movements actions. Yet I get called names and attacked simply because I DO talk about certain activities caused by "some" of the groups members
Which for some reason is a TABOO subject simply because it paints them in a bad light. [WE know its the actions by a few] yet what many OWS supporters choose to do is to instead of denouncing those activities they rather play them down...
Originally posted by Drezden
I can watch a video of a U.S. soldier throwing a puppy or shooting a civilian.. does that mean I believe U.S. soldiers as a whole are terrorists, violent and cruel? No I don't..
Originally posted by apacheman
One aspect of having an identifiable leadership is the ease with which that leadership can be nullified once it is identified, so I don't view that as a negative, but rather as a survival necessity. Identify the leaders, smear the leaders, by extension smear the movement, and kill it.
The agenda is broad-ranging because the ills of our society are equally broad-ranging: one size doesn't fit all.
Most of the anti-OWS crowd refuse to acknowledge the depth and breadth of the corruption and rot in our society, seemingly because they have a vested interest in the status quo, and don't want anything but changes on the fringes that will minimally effect them.
Originally posted by Drezden
Originally posted by Recce1
reply to post by Drezden
Why do you disregard the proven instance of an OWS demonstrator defecating on a police car? Was that merely a man responding to the call of nature?
You are grasping at straws indeed to excuse the behavior of all too many OWS protestors. Name one such instance of such an instance at a Tea Party rally.
First, I did not specifically disregard an OWS protestor defecating on a police car. That is one man, the majority of haven't been on police cars you would agree?
...
Originally posted by Drezden
Most of the cities haven't had problems worthy of putting in the news, so you don't hear about the protestors who are behaving, you here repeated bad stories out of Oakland or NY and judge the whole protest by it. It's very skewed.
Originally posted by Drezden
Who on ATS is speaking on behalf of OWS? I haven't seen anyone do that? As you've pointed out it is leaderless, so those that are speaking on behalf of OWS, especially on ATS.. are credible OWS spokespeople because?
It's inaccurate to say that OWS wants a violent revolution.
Originally posted by Drezden
That video is the worst/violent/aggressive OWS has been. In the video no one was hurt, the protestors vocally and physically denounce the actions of that very small handful of people who were vandalizing and harassing. Oakland has had more negative OWS moments than any other city. I can watch a video of a U.S. soldier throwing a puppy or shooting a civilian.. does that mean I believe U.S. soldiers as a whole are terrorists, violent and cruel? No I don't.. but with the poor logic you use, that connection could easily be made.