It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But in a 1982 interview on "Good Morning America," Walken insisted he did not quarrel with Wagner.
"No, that's not true," Walken said when asked if a fight was the reason Wood left the yacht. "They were very good to me, that family, and that's not true.
"We were having a Thanksgiving weekend, a good time," he said.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Does that mean Christopher Walken is a suspect?
Well the police very quickly said at the end of the video that he is not a suspect but apparently Dennis Davern the captain is still claiming Wagner was the cause.
edit on 18-11-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Dennis Davern, the former captain of the yacht Splendour broke his long silence with a detailed account in "Goodbye Natalie, Goodbye Splendour," a book he wrote with his friend Marti Rulli. It was published in September 2009.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Whats intriguing about this case is that there are so many possibilities as to what happened.
- She could have slipped.
- She could have committed suicide.
- She could have tried to leave in the smaller boat and then fell overboard and drowned.
- Robert could have made her leave in the smaller boat and then she fell in.
- Robert could have pushed her in the water.
- Robert could have killed her and dumped her in the water.
The chances of her trying to leave in the tiny boat are small because she was afraid of the water, unless she was afraid for her life or being beaten at that point. The way i see it , it would have been hard for her to fall in the water and Robert not have seen it happen.
edit on 18-11-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I want to know what evidence suddenly pops up after 30 years.
You are correct.There is no statue of limitations for murder.But pushing somebody into water isnt murder,it is negligent homicide,which would be the charge.Once again,the staue of limitations has run out on that particular crime.
Originally posted by ReeceIkyle
reply to post by brindle
Crimes that are considered exceptionally heinous by society have no statute of limitations. As a rule, there is no statute of limitations for murder, especially capital or first-degree murder.