reply to post by Phage
Before openly recommending the conventional, allopathic methods of treatment, it's polite to include a run-down on the potential dangers of a
treatment. I'm inclined to include the whole article here (it's short), but will keep it down to ATS regulations.
The Dangers of Chemotherapy
Side Effects ...
Permanent Effects ...
Secondary Cancer
In addition to helping treat some forms of cancer, chemotherapy is also carcinogenic, meaning it has the ability to cause cancer itself. As
chemotherapy destroys cells, including healthy cells, it disrupts their ability to divide. Cancer cells are cells that have lost their ability to
regulate their growth. Secondary cancer may surface months--or even years--after treatment, according to Caring4Cancer. The most common types of
cancers to result from chemotherapy treatments are lymphomas and leukemias, according to the American Cancer Society.
www.livestrong.com...
It's the perfect fit to what is described as the "disease racket" - pitting the fear of the disease against the fear of the cure. Your saying
"Hurry, not much time left ..." is a part of that strategy; people know they have "this horrible disease" and are desperate to cure it. The
industry provides the corral, and in go the heads of cattle.
Back in the sixties, fifteen or so years after the first nuclear tests with Trinity they formulated a plan to start anti-smoking lobbies as a
front-cover, a scapegoat for what they knew then would be upcoming cancer problems sweeping society. Since then there have been half a dozen notable
nuclear disasters, over two thousand tests, and numerous leaks and breaches in holding resevoirs - in some cases, wide-open pools of radioactive waste
open to the environment.
The problem of "cancer" has only been amplified by pollution issues from industry, transportation - it needs no introduction. A health rep warned me
to wear a mask when cutting brick for a masonry company as he spotted me in the yard without one one day. He asked me "If you took a side of beef in
a butcher's shop, and threw dust on it, what would happen"?
"It would stick to it", I replied.
"That's right. And when your lungs collect dust from that brick, they contain silica, which can collect on the soft tissues and eventually grow
over. Years from now, that silica will aggravate the inner tissues of the lung, and can cause silicosis of the lungs, although you won't see the
results until ten or twenty years from now". Forgive my side-ramble here Phage. I wore a mask from that day onwards!
So the vectors to cause cancer are there from all sides, possibly even from emotional issues, simply from stressing about all the myriad of problems
we are facing.
I have only one question. What possible sense does it make to add radiation to our cells, or our tissues, when radiation is potentially the cause of
our initial problems with this disease? The doses are different, the application is different, but the same methodology applies : they can't pinpoint
this to a safe degree, and admit that they can't. It's too risky from the onset!
How can we advocate something that carries such a high risk factor? There has to be a better solution. Someday we're going to call today's
physicians "barbarians" and corporate murderers. Maybe today?
From the Douglas report :
Curing cancer without dangerous drugs
douglassreport.com...
Are there any alternatives to chemotherapy?
douglassreport.com...
