It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Alleged extraterrestrial mummy, Quispicanchi (Cuzco - Peru)

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Nov, 20 2011 @ 09:59 AM
as for the natal molars....


..."Natal molars are rare occurances, the present instance being only the eighteenth reported case."

from: Natal Primary Molar: Case Report
Google Search: infants born with molars


the report points out that there are several types of molars that can be present at birth or prenatal or neonatal,
the molars present in the ancient 50cm skeleton has molars...but that is not an un-human condition, the report cites a study of some 18k cases and 62 cases of infant molars existed & 38 of those were 'pairs' of theeth that should not have normally developed yet

also consider this:

Congenital syphilis is syphilis present in utero and at birth, and occurs when a child is born to a mother with secondary syphilis. Untreated syphilis results in a high risk of a bad outcome of pregnancy, including mulberry molars in the fetus....Rarely, the symptoms of syphilis go unseen in infants so that they develop the symptoms of late-stage syphilis, including damage to their bones, teeth, eyes, ears, and brain

so.... the water brain skull, the molars in the jaw are not proof of the skeletons being non-human,
the 19 inch and 15 inch mummified corpses could have been afflicted babies...from syphillis or other genetic abnormalities...
i can only wait for the government scientists investigation to read a knowledgeable report that will be conducted next week (Nov 25-30th?)


posted on Nov, 20 2011 @ 01:46 PM

Originally posted by smarterthanyou
would need to do age and dna testing to be conclusive.

Exactly, and I'm glad to see coming more members who understand that point. Thanks.

posted on Nov, 20 2011 @ 02:01 PM
reply to post by St Udio

Great comments. Yes, for now all we an do is wait for those results. Meanwhile, let me tell you that yesterday I read declarations from one of the local gov. representatives. He was declaring the founds belong to a child, but he didn't present any evidence to support his claim. Also said the way the mummies were extracted was illegal.

Let's see If the mummies (remember they are 2), get seized by gov too, after tested.
edit on 20-11-2011 by Trueman because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 21 2011 @ 07:18 AM
Holy smokes... i don't give a damn if that comes back human, it is clearly not an average human and there is something very haunting about the mummification as a whole... as if it was preened upon by time in a certain way.

I'd say that is pretty damn remarkable.

posted on Nov, 22 2011 @ 05:01 PM
Finally, we have the results :

The bones found in Andahuaylillas belong to two children aged between zero and 3 years old, and not "aliens", as noted archaeologist Rene Davila.

The skeletal remains of Andean Rituals private museum in the district of Andahuaylillas, Cuzco, corresponding to two pre-Hispanic infants undergoing cranial deformation processes, which belies the anthropologist Renato Davila, who had noted that the mummy belonged to "beings aliens ", but later recanted.

Anthropologist Elva Torres, head of the Office of Physical Anthropology of the Regional Directorate of Culture, Cusco, reported that the first individual corresponds to a child who has lost the lower post mortem.

The skull, said the expert-type strain shows ring and you can see traces of the deformed pads frontal and occipital bone and the marks left by deforming the parietal bands.

In addition, the specialist explained that as a result of cranial deformation, orbital cavities were enlarged and still see part of the eyeball in the right orbit. The infant had died after three or four years.

Regarding the cranial sutures, said they are in the process of closing, including the fontanelle, a process occurs in childhood but may last longer depending on many factors.

According to a local newspaper, regarding the second skeleton, corresponds to a baby from zero to one years and has the incomplete skull and found that only parietal and occipital bones articulated to the rear of the skull.

The archaeologist said Sunday that the distortion Farfan prehispanic skull were made with small tables, molds and headbands for children under three years in various towns of Tahuantinsuyo as an indicator of social status or as a mark of a religious nature.

I'm glad to be the one to bring this info here and close this case.

posted on Nov, 22 2011 @ 09:19 PM
How do you tell its alien. At best you can only tell what it is not, human. It might be a relative of the human species. Neanderthal wasnt alien and didnt build no spaceships either.

posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 03:11 AM
reply to post by Cassius666

In times of Pre-columbian and Incas cultures there were no "neanderthal" or similar.

"Neanderthal" or similars mummies? ...... doesn't make sense.

Anyway, nobody could tell if it was human for sure and that's why a group of scientist were sent.

The title of the thread starts with the word "ALLEGED".

edit on 23-11-2011 by Trueman because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 07:38 AM

Originally posted by Trueman
Too early to make conclusions yet, lets see how this one could be confirmed or debunked. Anyway, the images are quiet impressive.

Translation :

A strange mummy was found in the province of Quispicanchi in Cusco. The anthropologist who found it, Renato Riquelme Davila, said it is extraterrestrial.

Davila said the being found is about 50 cm, with triangular head, eye sockets too large for a human being, likewise, said he has an open fontanelle (the space between the bones of the skull that have babies until the year life, as they grow, space, or fontanelle, disappears).

The curious fact is that despite this division present the mummy has molars, which do not grow in humans until 4 or six years.

Davila says that at first thought he was a child, however Spanish and Russian doctors have confirmed he is a being from another planet.

Sorry about the annoying x-file music on the video, just click mute.

More pics in this link :

edit on 17-11-2011 by Trueman because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-11-2011 by Trueman because: (no reason given)

I was just looking at the pictures of a mother gorilla today and her baby when I clocked the shape of their heads and the similarity to this skull

for some reason I can't make the photo come up.

edit on 23-11-2011 by Loopdaloop because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:04 PM
reply to post by Loopdaloop

Well, that would be very strange since there are not gorillas in america.....wait, maybe I'm wrong.....what about those ones in Oakland?

posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 11:47 AM
All you people who keep saying this could be a deformed child are completely wrong, I'll tell u why with evidence and hard facts "proof".

If we assume the skeleton is 100% original and untampered with, the molars on the upper and lower jaw are adult teeth. I challenge you to find an adolescent female of approximately 2 years old who has fully developed molars and jaw structure, Anywhere, EVER!? find one other example...and I will concede.

Secondly, We will know for sure the age of at least part of the mummy when and if c14 test is done, as well as DNA.. big IF. Untill then we can not say either way... we can't say its fake, we can't say it isn't... And thats that.

As some other people said, cases like these tend to dissapear, have horrendous trouble getting financing or contacting reputable facilities to do the work.. For some strange reason which is common with most things like this.

The fact that things like this disappear, "get lost", damaged, missing pieces, or 100 other articles like it pop up within weeks, or all kinds of debunkers start to the races tells me one thing... There are alot of idiots on the internet, and maybe there is really something to this. Attention of any kind, either negative or positive, bunking or de-bunking, the more attention something gets, the more likely its genuine... Such as Roswell TONS OF ATTENTION! hmmm.... suspicious, circumstantial but VERRRRY suspicious.

posted on Jan, 27 2014 @ 12:24 PM

... I'll tell u why with evidence and hard facts "proof".

If we assume the
... adolescent female of approximately 2 years old

hard facts and then you say if???
aolescent at 2 years old???

what are you on about???

top topics

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in