Yeah I'm trolling. But women are indeed insane... some more then once a month.

edit on 17-11-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason
given)
The company said women are twice as likely as men to use anxiety treatments, as 11 percent of women 45 to 65 are on an anxiety medication. Women are also more likely than men to take antipsychotic drugs like Zyprexa, Risperdal, and Abilify, which treat disorders like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. However, among men 20 to 64, use of the drugs has quadrupled over the last decade............
........Pharmaceutical companies have also sought and received approvals to market their drugs to larger groups of people.
A century ago, fewer than two people per 1,000 were considered to be "disabled" by mental illness and in need of hospitalisation . By 1955, that number had jumped to 3 .38 people per 1,000, and during the past 50 years, a period when psychiatric drugs have been the cornerstone of care, the disability rate has climbed steadily, and has now reached around 20 people per 1,000. (Table 2) . As with any epidemic, one would suspect that an outside agent of some type-a virus, a bacterial infection, or an environmental toxinwas causing this rise in illness .
That is indeed the case here . There is an outside agent fueling this epidemic of mental illness, only it is to be found in the medicine cabinet . Psychiatric drugs perturb normal neurotransmitter function, and while that perturbation may curb symptoms over a short term, over the long run it increases the likelihood that a
person will become chronically ill, or ill with new and more severe symptoms . A review
of the scientific literature shows quite clearly that it is our drug-based paradigm of care
that is fueling this modem-day plague.
So rather than fix the broken society we 'fix' the broken population....we're only a symptom. Why not treat the cause?
Now - what about the children?
They just got on with it. Or drank copious amounts of gin.
Originally posted by christina-66
Wow! That's a pity...this thread had the potential to roll out to be a pretty interesting discussion and has instead become a slagging match between the sexes.
I suppose with the hormonal roller coaster women go thru until their late 40's to early 50's it's hardly surprising women are more often prescribed anti-depressant/anxiety meds than men but don't be getting too complacent guys.
The company said women are twice as likely as men to use anxiety treatments, as 11 percent of women 45 to 65 are on an anxiety medication. Women are also more likely than men to take antipsychotic drugs like Zyprexa, Risperdal, and Abilify, which treat disorders like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. However, among men 20 to 64, use of the drugs has quadrupled over the last decade............
........Pharmaceutical companies have also sought and received approvals to market their drugs to larger groups of people.
The Washington Post
The reason for this increase in drug taking is because we're all mad???? Or is it because the 'solution' in fact creates the problem?
A century ago, fewer than two people per 1,000 were considered to be "disabled" by mental illness and in need of hospitalisation . By 1955, that number had jumped to 3 .38 people per 1,000, and during the past 50 years, a period when psychiatric drugs have been the cornerstone of care, the disability rate has climbed steadily, and has now reached around 20 people per 1,000. (Table 2) . As with any epidemic, one would suspect that an outside agent of some type-a virus, a bacterial infection, or an environmental toxinwas causing this rise in illness .
That is indeed the case here . There is an outside agent fueling this epidemic of mental illness, only it is to be found in the medicine cabinet . Psychiatric drugs perturb normal neurotransmitter function, and while that perturbation may curb symptoms over a short term, over the long run it increases the likelihood that a
person will become chronically ill, or ill with new and more severe symptoms . A review
of the scientific literature shows quite clearly that it is our drug-based paradigm of care
that is fueling this modem-day plague.
Anatomy of an Epidemic
So rather than fix the broken society we 'fix' the broken population....we're only a symptom. Why not treat the cause?
Now - what about the children?edit on 18-11-2011 by christina-66 because: (no reason given)
Psychiatric drugs perturb normal neurotransmitter function, and while that perturbation may curb symptoms over a short term, over the long run it increases the likelihood that a
person will become chronically ill, or ill with new and more severe symptoms . A review
of the scientific literature shows quite clearly that it is our drug-based paradigm of care
that is fueling this modem-day plague.
This says it all.
And, many times, a person with very mild symtoms, or a patient "acting" out the symptoms will be prescribed a full dose by doctors.
That will soon enough cause a full blown case to display itself.
I wonder too, how many "patients" are current or former illegal drug users/abusers ?
I also wonder if any drugs (legal or illegal) can cause a DNA change that carries on to offspring ?
If Ritalin causes DNA changes, then how many children of Ritalin users are affected ?
Interesting how that article ties in with SSI disability PAYMENTS.
I would imagine that those "recipients" must maintain regular doctor visits and certifications (all for a fee of course). Hmmmmm.
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by capone1
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by capone1
I certainly do think that drugs help many people, I just worry that we are becoming far to over medicated as a society. Of course someone with a serious problem will benefit greatly from drugs in many cases, but giving someone with a bad case of the Mondays a prescription seems a bit much.
You're absolutely right. Sooner or later we may evolve to depend on chemicals.
But... There is a BIG difference between, let's say painkillers..and Celexa.
Painkillers can easily be abused, as we all know. But brain drugs like Celexa can literally fix the amount of "happy" chemicals you don't get anymore. And I call those drugs a miracle.
But drugs people can abuse, like painkillers, sedatives, etc., need to be controlled a bit more.edit on 17-11-2011 by capone1 because: (no reason given)
You who think all this drugging everyone up starting at age 5 is GOOD in any way, are obviously ON DRUGS. You are so taken by the propaganda I can't believe it. Complete Stockholm syndrome, you are thanking your poisoners for poisoning you.
Every time I go to the US and see the nonstop drug ads on TV I am horrified. Everyone else seems to not even notice. Or rather, you DO notice, and go out and let quacks drug you and your children up.
Somehow, for all of history, the entire population of the world has managed to muddle through without popping freaking pills every day. How could that be? Why weren't ONE QUARTER of them just freaking right out, since they did not have any pills? Oh wait, I guess in China during the Opium Wars and all, a lot of people were on drugs. Look how that HELPED them all out. At least they felt good about it.
And, wait a minute. Who was responsible for purposely drugging an entire nation in order to make tons of money and enslave the people? Hmmm.
Couldn't be sort of the same cast of characters, could it? Naah, it's their grandchildren. They are here to HELP you.
Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by aeriess
Any depression I ever get I can usually shake it off in a few days.
The best medication for depression is going on a shopping spree
with your husband's favorite credit card.edit on 18-11-2011 by mamabeth because: changed mind
Originally posted by aeriess
reply to post by slowisfast
I'm not married. I was.
Find me a guy who has NEVER cheated. I certainly don't know a single one. Family, friends, parents of friends growing up, etc. Not one.