do you have better sources?
he U.S. government fakers have their disaster at their hands for the Pentagon that was hit on 9-11-1 by a USAF cruise missile (FBI inside information,
via German national security police to this author; further proven by all evidence if scrupulously examined).
The Pentagon commissioned, after 9-11, a Building Performance Report. For months, experts studied the specifics of the building damage, the plane
size, and compiled the report. Engineers under Dr. Mete Sozen of the engineering faculty of Purdue University compiled in hundreds of hours of
supercomputer simulation a model of how the plane (alleged flight AA 77) crashed into the Pentagon.
Their model is on the internet under the name "Purdue Simulation", easy to find via Google etc.
At the time the Purdue Simulation was finalized and published on the internet, the following still photo announces to the viewer’s eye what happened
(my Exhibit „A“):
This still image results from a supercomputer simulation of the engineering faculty at Purdue University after months of study of all measurements of
building and plane. It is precise to the inch in ist sizes and proportions.
Some months after the Purdue Simulation was finalized, the Will Morris photo Nr. 1 was published by sources near to the government reportedly at
Stanford University (Sarah Roberts). It shows us the above plane left the below hole:
We see several broken windows where a Revell kit model plane could have flown in but no Boeing 757 passenger plane as shown in the Purdue Simulation.
All there is in terms of a „hole“ is a crack in the facade at the level of the undamaged Pentagon lawn, clearly no higher than the floor line of the
Mysteriously, the plane size as meticulously calculated by the Purdue University engineers in no way fits under the crack.
Here is another photo, taken minutes after impact by a member of the Marine Corps Photo Lab (Cpl. Jason Ingersoll), which finished the government
theory of a „Boeing 757 hit) off for good:
Column 15 is immediately to the right of the large orange spot-fire from the missile explosion. The seeming „pillars“ to the right of this that are
pushed to the right are the narrow sides of support walls.
Walls get pushed sideways by shaped charges from missiles. If a plane had physically collided with the building, it would have pushed the support
walls into the building and not displaced them sideways. A plane of the size shown above would have left a large hole in the facade above the ground
We see the 6 foot high cable spool not displaced by the in-whooshing „plane“. Take these 6 feet off the free air space that the plane had to damage
the facade. And you will quickly realize that the government is lying through its teeth.
Now you may understand why a soldier testified that he smelled cordite from the explosion – a plane would have smelled of kerosene not cordite.
Now you may understand why only one single small jet engine was found (parts) and not the two 9-foot tall turbofans of a Boeing 757.
Now you may understand why Donald Rumsfeld initially stated that a bomb had hit the Pentagon.
Now you may understand why the clean-up team found parts of a cruise missile but no parts of a Boeing 757.
Now you may understand why - which I doubt in the first place - the DNA tests identified all passengers but none of the Arab hijackers.
Now you may understand why no luggage was ever found.
[edit on 4-9-2004 by psilocin]