The cover up as to God's gender, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 03:26 AM by GonzoSinister
Wait a minute....

How can anyone question this?

The re is no proof at all that the bible is in anyway factual, niether the stories told in the torah or the koran...

So on that basis... surley God can be as female as He/She wants him/her too be....

essentially, there is actual proff that god either exsists or is male, you are basing what you believe (or most of you are) on teachings from the same tree of god worship (jew,muslim,christian)
all these holy books were written by men, essentially for as women had no say in society back then, and for hundereds of years after (generally)

So if you were writting a book telling people what you thought about God why would you call him a her? why would you tell me in power, priests and kings that a woman had set out there rules there comandments.


so clearly from an objective standpoint if you believe in God untill there is proof not derived from a heavily bastardised holy book written by a certain cross section of the human species (males) in a time where women were a second class citizen then how can you possibly question the gender of god?


The jesus example is a good one... we all have seen statues in the west of jesus, about 5'11, hardcore beard and hair combo, white....lets be honest IF there was a jesus he was an arab fellow, probably around the 5,5, mark at best, most likley jet black hair and a bit of a tan! so there is somthing we can outright use as an example of the way the bible and images taken from it (and other relative holy books) have been bent throughout history to suit the dominent section of society in the west (white males)


Untill Someone can prodcue proof that God exsists (actual proof not hear say books)

there is no argument in this post, man/woman/goat/fish could literally be anything


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 05:51 AM by vedatruth
reply to post by GonzoSinister



It does not matter if God is considered male or female. If God is one (and you believe in that), the question becomes moot, as single God has to have the qualities of both man and woman.

We cannot say the status of women in society equates the concept of God. The image of Jesus can change, but not of God. God stays the same ir-respective of time or social conditions.

God created man and woman. Man was created with certain physical characterstics which suit going out and engage in physical activities. Woman was created with certain characterstics which suit domestic work and raising children. Both activities are important to sustaining human societies.

The statement "man was made in the image of God" should not be taken literally. Woman are as capable of godliness as man. So while society has given different roles and responsibilities to man and woman, that does not make woman inferior in the eyes of God.


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 06:14 AM by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by WarJohn



The cover up as to God's gender was very successful.


/sigh

My source is God Herself.


.....



How can so many of you not get the slightest inkling that God is female?







reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 06:46 AM by Turkenstein
Originally posted by WarJohn
The cover up as to God's gender was very successful. There is no book in the bible being true about God's gender. Not even the books Jesus' words are in. Proving that Jesus is with the cover up. There is also no Christian religion teaching the truth to God's gender.

What is being covered up, even by that Jesus character, is that God's true gender is female. Why? Just to please the men who ruled the world back in the days.

Jesus is revealed as all for the cover up. As you've read Jesus makes out God the heavenly Father (a he).

My source is God Herself. The only actually good alpha female will have a few two-way communications with her elect in some other format of communication unknown to the planet's so called know-it-alls who are not elect.

The God I know is radically sexual, and full of desire, in an elect's uttermost desireable ways. Do you all even know what this means for the elect when up in paradise? I think you do.

No religion has things 100% right. No book has things 100% right. Just the elect can attain certain things 100% right, let the motherly God provide them.

How can so many of you not get the slightest inkling that God is female? The cover up doesn't need to be any longer. This isn't the days written about in history books anymore. Let the wrong know.

edit on 17-11-2011 by WarJohn because: (no reason given)



Wow. This only begs one question? Do War Johns have to pay like normal Johns when going on a pay date.


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 07:31 AM by ntzeret
...... well truth be told... "God" should be considered asexual because he wouldn't need a mate to bring another "God" into existence. But actually, it is more Non sexual because "God" isn't in any danger of getting old or feeble, or dying. You know how you mere mortals get old and loose your house keys or forget where you parked your car????... "GOD" doesn't need to worry about that. He creates constantly, and has been FOREVER.. There are critters running around that passed his "apple test" from their very beginning. They were the first batches of angels.. They became the stars and hosts for all the other planets in the universes..
Not having to worry about dying and death and disease, they were able to live a long and prosperous life ( and some still do) being able to gain knowledge and hone wisdom. They were actually some what hermaphroditic. and produced offspring by means of parthenogenesis. But living practically forever kills a species's sex drive. So it wasn't all to common to have what we see here in this planet, over sexed and the mating urge and building a family to pass on stuff to the next generation is not needed in immortal beings. In this neck of the woods. The Angels lived Near one of the gas Giants. Lucifer was the first being that would been considered a "Male". He ruled over what at one time was Virgo, Libra and Scorpio, This grouping was at one time was one constellation. Think of the name Luci (light) fer (iron) he was the first to make tools and weapons and learned about metals, music, art and all that stuff. He was very smart and a very gifted being. But his sign, the purity of Virgo, the Elegance and Beauty of Libra, and the Intellect, Pride and Passion of Scorpio proved too much for one entity to handle.. He at one time led the worship of the Creator, and all too soon found in his heart that he himself wanted to be worshiped. He was good at seducing the other angels whom bore him lil angels and lead a war straight to "God's" House in the center of this Galaxy.
His present reptilian form is a punishment as he did used to sparkle very beautiful, and the colors of his "scales" (not really called "scales" but the real word wouldn't make any sense to you anyway) shimmered like the stars. Think of the Blue Lady in Farscape, but a white light, yellowish and translucent. anyhow. It was actually more fish-skinned like, very tiny tiny. Did you know Cain and Abel were twins?... probably not. Its is recorded that Eve first ate the apple with Lucifer right?... then she had to hurry up real quick to eat "another apple" with Adam.. enough said. They were Eve's children, but one of them was the son of Lucifer himself!! Cain, or Abel was the first Tare among the Wheat so to speak, but since it is hard to say for sure which one was born by Adam and which one was born by Lucifer, all bets are off.. unless well. think about it and you might realize that you have been played by these beings from the very beginning... Why do I know these things? Family secrets =) Figure out what a "Netzer" is and maybe you will glean something.

This Cover-up Goes beyond The Gender of the God-Head.. It Covers Up Your own Divinity and Place in this Cosmos. It reveals the conceit and bitterness of Jealous Territorial Beings who think of You as Cattle. If a cow all of a sudden said to you,, Hi Human!!! I know 2+2 =4.... would you eat it? (unless it said, can I interest you in parts of my body... right? ) Therein lies the source of your dilemma!

You need to be the change you want to be. That has been said before and over and over again on countless worlds. Very soon though.. Enough of you are waking up and questioning, your values, your beliefs, your economics. Your Education and your.. well This is a fantastic time for all of you to wake up and realize this nightmare is Changeable and Challenge it. Destroy it Before It destroys You!!


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 09:15 AM by undo
Okay, i'm about to demonstrate that the OP is both wrong and right. The following is regarding the "Creation" of "man". every word with a number after it, was in the original text, every word without a number, was added by translators.

Genesis 1:27
So God 430 created 1254 man 120 in his [own] image 6754, in the image 6754 of God 430 created 1254 he him; male 2145 and female 5347 created 1254 he them.

Now REMOVE words that have no number after them, which should result in this more accurate version of the verse:

God created man image, image God created, male female created.

Key words in the original language further help to understand the verse in context:

elohim created adam image, image elohim created, male female created

What the translators did was make assumptions. They assumed adam was to be used in this passage as a generic label about our species.. et. al, "man," and then later used as a specific label, et.al, adam as a single human and eve as a single female.

that's not what the text says. the text says elohim, a plural word, created male and female. the hebrew used there for male and female can also be plural and since elohim is plural, it makes more logical sense to use the plural form of male and female. so, the text there should read

elohim (the gods) created adam (plural word) image, image elohim created, males females created.

ah but there's more. this whole thing is about grammar. the word for images there can ALSO be plural, and it should since grammatically, the rest of the sentence is plural. so the text should read

elohim (the gods) created adam images, images elohim created, males females created.

In effect that verse is informing you that there were male gods and female gods, and that the first adam race was created in their images.

edit on 18-11-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 09:38 AM by stephanies-chase
reply to post by WarJohn



"Do you all even know what this means for the elect when up in paradise?"

um.....lots of sex. Did I get it right!!!??? Do I win anything!!!???
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags