House Bill Banning Congressional Insider Trading Gathering Steam—From 4 Cosponsors to 35 in 2 Days, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 16-11-2011 @ 01:06 PM by jibeho
Finally some good news coming from DC that I can actually support

Prior to the release of Breitbart editor Peter Schweizer’s blockbuster book, Throw Them All Out, legislative efforts to pass a bill banning insider trading by members of Congress had floundered.

But all that is changing—and fast.

Congressman Tim Walz (D-MN) says that before the 60 Minutes report on Schweizer’s book, his STOCK (Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge) Act, H.R. 1148, had only garnered four cosponsors in Congress since he and Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) re-introduced the legislation on March 18, 2011.

In the two days since the 60 Minutes program aired, Walz says the number of House members supporting the bill has shot up to thirty-five, and climbing.


This is what journalism and reporting is supposed to be about. Spread the blame and point the fingers at any and all involved regardless of party line. Unfortunately, I guess it took two scathing books to get the media to actually open their eyes wide enough to see what we've been talking about for years.

Keep this information in the headlines

This legislation was first introduced in 2006 and went nowhere!! Imagine if it had passed then, where we would be right now? I know Pelosi would be worth far less than she is now.

Congressman Walz says the 60 Minutes report on Throw Them All Out is making all the difference.

“If you didn’t think Congress’ approval rating can go any lower than 9 percent, have them watch the 60 Minutes story,” he told the Mankato Free Press. “And that’s a problem.”


GOOD STUFF!!
biggovernment.com...
edit on 16-11-2011 by jibeho because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-11-2011 @ 01:21 PM by jibeho
reply to post by tjack



Congressman Walz has been trying to push this since 2006 and reintroduced again back in March of 2011. He and others knew there was a problem. However, it would seem that the crony power structure of DC has been working overtime in recent years. Wealth is tough thing to lose for those whose only career structure lies in DC.


reply posted on 17-11-2011 @ 12:50 PM by mishigas
reply to post by jibeho




I would love to see some serious reform on Capital Hill. Strict term limits should be the first step in returning Congress back to the people that it is supposed to represent. Two terms consecutive or split nothing more. Fresh ideas, and fresh voices that speak for US.


Hear, hear! I second that motion! Term limits, first order of business. Now that is Change You Can Believe In!

There is a semi-powerful radio talk show host who always shoots down the idea of term limits by saying We already have term limits! they are called elections! To him I merely point to Nancy Pelosi as a rebuttal.


reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 12:26 PM by jibeho
The more I look into this Bill the more I find just more of the same as well as a Kiss of Death from Nancy Pelosi. If she likes it, it's got to be full of loopholes that would clear her and her questionable stock dealings. Apparently, it does not go far enough to be effective in its current form

As for the official language used in the eventual bill, Rep. Pelosi said, “I’m sure they’ll come up with something that removes all doubt that this is something that is acceptable within the Congress, and when they do, to me it seems like it would fly through Congress.”

However, a closer look at the loophole-ridden language of the bill under consideration, says Peter Schweizer, reveals the need for several additional provisions not presently included in the STOCK Act.

First, political candidates and members of Congress should commit to placing their assets in a blind trust, says Schweizer. While many members of Congress do this voluntarily, most don’t. Whether through law or public pressure, says Schweizer, elected officials should reduce the appearance of a conflict of interest by establishing a blind trust.

Second, Schweizer says the bill must protect the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) from budgetary or personal retaliation by the Congress for investigating its members.

Third, an effective bill must prohibit members of Congress and their staffs from passing along private information to family members, friends, or associates that could aid them in making lucrative stock purchases. That, says Schweizer, is not clearly codified in the existing legislation under consideration.

Finally, members of Congress should be required to provide greater transparency about their investments by publicly posting their stock trades within 48 hours of making them. As the New York Post noted yesterday, currently “the bills contain lawyerly loopholes, including a 90-day grace period on reporting stock trades and a narrow limit on trading proscriptions, making them applicable only to ‘pending or prospective legislative action’ involving the issuer of the securities.”


biggovernment.com...

What a disappointment. Share this info. with whoever you can to put the pressure on ensuring that the proper language and provisions are included in this bill.


reply posted on 2-12-2011 @ 12:33 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by jibeho



Just pass it now and fix it later. At least we know about it.

US congressmen will have to find a new way to - cash in - when they go to Washington DC.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 15 days ago with 26 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 21 member flags
Ron Paul, Adam Smith Push To End Indefinite Detention Of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 20 member flags
The Vetting Breitbart - Obama : Born in Kenya
  Posted 12 days ago with 18 member flags