reply to post by SyphonX
Could you please provide some statistics on Mason vs non-Mason moderators on this forum? And at what percentage constitutes a "chunk"?
Are we Masons not entitled to be on this website, this forum? Are we not entitled, that showing proper skill and ability, to become Moderators? If
you think a Moderator who is a Mason has acted improperly then please show us when and how.
Freemasonry is not "wholly exclusive to old white men". I'm 27, but if that is old then call me geriatric. I am white, but my Grand Lodge does
not exclude members based on race or skin color. There is a Prince Hall Lodge in our area, but we are in amity with them and often visit each others
Lodges.
If Freemasonry is a cult then we can call any assemblage of men with similar beliefs a cult. You throw cult around like your trying to beat us with a
stick. Fundamentalist? Freemasonry? Hell, in the 1st degree alone we teach one should practice moderation and circumscribe our desires so that we
don't fall to one extreme or the other.
You also think you can speak for all non-Masons, but that is extremely pompous, pretentious, and arrogant.
If we are attack dogs then we are only loosed upon only lies, fallacies, hoaxes, and defamation. I fight against the enemies of Freemasonry: tyranny,
fanaticism, and ignorance. If this makes me a horrible person in your eyes then I am not going to have any trouble sleeping at night.
If we are brainwashed by our cult, wouldn't our family and friends have noticed negative symptoms of this membership?