South Carolina Establishment seeks to BAN Ron Paul and supporters from all future events

page: 4
96
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


Please read what I actually said. Who said anything about banning anyone and I agreed it's their right. That makes it no less childish however to boo people at a debate. It also turns people against your candidate and hurts him.

Ranting at me for things I never said or intended is not reasonable.

If the other side is doing the same, then yes they are children as well. You boo people at the ballot box. Acting childish for the world to see does not help your candidate at all. You really thinks he wants his supporters acting that way or running around the Internet trying to ruin online polls? Of course not.

You support him, what's wrong with acting like adults and being civil in public debates?

Your right to act any way you wish though, I'll give you that. What is your right and what is reasonable are two separate topics. Generally people abandon childish outbursts when they mature.




posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   
You have to love it. Romney speaks of his support for torture and assasination, Paul's supporters boo him, so they are looking to ban Paul. What Romney should do now is talk about sending Jews to gas chambers. Then, when everyone boos him, get all the candidates banned. He'll win by default.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   
The Obots in the last election were by far the most obnoxious supporters I've ever run across.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ker2010
 


Interesting because Ron Paul is on my short list of who to vote for and yet I think acting unruly at the debates demeans Paul and drives others away from him.

Would I be a more effective supporter of Paul or a person who tries and drown out his opposition while he is talking?

Did you miss the 50+ times he's been on FoxNews or the fact he has been getting plenty of coverage the last couple of days. Damn them when they do wrong, but praise them when they do right, otherwise its just irrationality.

I suggest that Paul appreciates the support, but may not be so happy about antisocial behavior by people claiming to support him while embarrassing him. Leave it to Mr. Paul to make his own points in debates. I'm betting he would appreciate that. Unless of course you don't trust your own candidate to represent himself?



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


Well at least you're honest, so you get points for that. The issue is that whenever the "establishment" worthy candidates supporters see Paul supporters doing something that merits them being called "childish" they suddenly act like their #e don't stink when they have turned around time and time again and do the same to Ron Paul. Not only that, but apparently they would like to see Ron Paul banned.


The "Angry" Ron Paul supporters you don't like have every right to be angry. This exact kind of hypocrisy from the establishment has been going on a long long long time, and they have never given Ron Paul a fair shake, period.
edit on 16-11-2011 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by schuyler
 


i laughed



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by schuyler
 




Did we get loud? hell yes, when Ron Paul walked by it was a storm of cheers, smiles, and energy.


That's absolutely unacceptable. How dare you!

Ban Ron Paul and his evil cheering masses!
edit on 16-11-2011 by L00kingGlass because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


There are people acting up that support all candidates. It's Election Time Madness


It probably should not bother me, but it does. To me it demeans the whole process. I don't even like the fact they time the debates. Let them stand there and debate until they can't stand up anymore and the biased pundits keep their mouths shut.

Still it is what it is.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


We can agree on that. In a "normal" setting one would think they could at least ask the same question to ALL candidates from left to right, giving each candidate the same amount of time for each with one 30 second follow up question. But nope, it can't be that simple, and it really shows us what the medias true agenda is.
edit on 16-11-2011 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Your right to act any way you wish though, I'll give you that. What is your right and what is reasonable are two separate topics. Generally people abandon childish outbursts when they mature.


You have to understand Blaine, that many of his supporters are still pretty much kids. His huge support among college kids brings with it a lot of young energy, and these kids are used to football pep rallies and such. Of course that's gonna clash with the older folks who are uncomfortable with, and I dare say envious of, their youth and enthusiasm. I think Ron Paul appreciates that enthusiasm, and it's against his principles to try and tell others how they need to act. He's up there to say what he has to say, regardless of what his supporters are doing. He doesn't control us all, nor should he. That would be creepy and cult like.

And if you want an example of the audience boo'ing Ron Paul, here ya go...have a watch...

www.youtube.com...

Didn't see ANY emails about Santorum or his supporters being banned after that.

Another thing that happened during the CBS debate where the RP supporters boo'ed Romney, was during a break a lone soldier in uniform stood up and yelled that the military supports Ron Paul. Didn't see him mentioned in the email as being rude or boorish. They wouldn't dare do that, even though he was expressing his enthusiasm as well.
edit on 16-11-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
That's because this douche nozzle believes that the politicians run things, not the people. I hope he's up for reelection soon so the people in SC can fire his ass. It also shows the rift between neocons and true conservatives in the GOP.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 06:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by ker2010
 


Interesting because Ron Paul is on my short list of who to vote


This is a lie Blaine boy ..a lie and you know it ...you love American empire and you dont want all troops to go home



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 07:18 PM
link   
Mit Romeny should be the one that gets shot if what he says is true, he I believe isn't looking for the good of the country.

The booing is part of our free speech, so what if we don't like what the speaker says, we have a right to boo, and how do you know they were for Ron Paul?



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


All I can do is laugh. This country's political system is pathetic.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Wookiep
 


There are people acting up that support all candidates. It's Election Time Madness


It probably should not bother me, but it does. To me it demeans the whole process. I don't even like the fact they time the debates. Let them stand there and debate until they can't stand up anymore and the biased pundits keep their mouths shut.

Still it is what it is.


I agree completely. Give them a topic and let them go at it. Why restrict the conversation? Let the American people find out what makes these people tick. You cant find out about anyone in 90 seconds though. CBS should never be able to host a debate again.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 07:49 PM
link   
Dean Allen : waaaahhhh boooo hooooooo mommy make Ron Paul go away!



What a sore loser
edit on 16-11-2011 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by davereality
 


Funny that you call others psychopaths to defend a sociopath.


America has lots of both because our culture has come to the point where "empathy" is about as naughty a word as "motherf-r" used to be.
edit on 16/11/2011 by TheWalkingFox because: (no reason given)


Funny that you think you're clever.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by AwakeinNM
That's because this douche nozzle believes that the politicians run things, not the people. I hope he's up for reelection soon so the people in SC can fire his ass. It also shows the rift between neocons and true conservatives in the GOP.


Hmm... Bush vs. Gore...

People's vote - Gore

What happened - Bush



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 08:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by VictorVonDoom
You have to love it. Romney speaks of his support for torture and assasination, Paul's supporters boo him, so they are looking to ban Paul. What Romney should do now is talk about sending Jews to gas chambers. Then, when everyone boos him, get all the candidates banned. He'll win by default.


I'm sure all the Larry the Cable Guy followers will at least win him the republican vote, then.



posted on Nov, 16 2011 @ 09:24 PM
link   
I will call Mr Allen and I will thank him in my most polite and non-sarcastic voice. I will ask him if he thinks the US Govt should just go ahead and assassinate Ron Paul just for good measure... I will be taping this conversation and will put it up on youtube if it's worthy.

He provided his phone number so I think he deserves to explain his position on assassinating US Citizens...

This is from the website -

Dean Allen
(843) 597-7459


I wonder how many calls he has received in the last few days???





top topics
 
96
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join