Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Reply to post by macman
Who owns the park?
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Don't know. That is a question that I have not seen answered.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Reply to post by macman
Who owns the park?
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by mobiusmale
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by daggyz
I've been involved in Occupy Atlanta since day one, and I'm employed. So are about 40% of the rest of the group. Not to mention some people have had hard time for more than "a day" and it's a lot harder to get a job. You're awesomely understanding of situations that aren't your wifes....
What kind of employment do you and the other 40% have that allows you to hang out a park 7 days a week, attend meetings, bang drums, sleep out in tents, never shower, etc.
I think that either your employment must be part-time or casual...or your presence at Occupy Atlanta must be. Nobody with full-time employment could have a full-time involvement with "the group".
Oh...and even if your numbers are right, this means that 60% of the people there are in fact camping out instead of looking for gainful employment. I wonder how many of those are actually drawing unemployment benefits, or collecting welfare, or receiving disability benefits from the system they hate so much...and for the most part paid for by the so-called 1% they so despise.
This campfire squatter assemblage is being sent home...prevented from continuing to live on public and private lands rent free and in contravention of the law...as they should be.
Protest is fine. Free speech is a right we all have. But protesters do not have the right to just take whatever they want from the rest of us, and claim they have the right to do so, just because they have something they want to complain about.
Originally posted by idk42
reply to post by macman
That's the point. The government is part of the problem, and guess who is directing the actions of the government? The ultra-wealthy, the banks, the corporations, and the government are connected at the hip. It's another wedge issue. They're trying to pit the Tea Party against OWS, the conservatives against the hippies, etc. when these people all want the same thing..to fix the system instead of letting the corrupt system continue to infest the economy, society, and government.
You say OWS doesn't represent you..well, it represents your interests, even if you don't realize it.
Originally posted by phoenix0714
reply to post by mobiusmale
Dude! Go take your anger and use it in a productive way. You have a very strong argument, it just needs to be steered into the right direction. The person you are picking on is doing something and trying to share the process with others who care to listen. You on the other hand are just being a roadblock between those good efforts. You can find a positive avenue for the things you feel strongly about, but this is not the way.
Originally posted by The Old American
Judge Rules Against "Occupy" Protestors
Supreme Court Justice Michael Stallman weighed whether to extend a temporary restraining order that bars the city from enforcing park rules against tents and other camping equipment. The original ruling came after police and sanitation workers had already swept all personal belongings from the two-month-old encampment, with more than 200 people arrested in the raid
Well, now the courts are getting involved. This is pretty interesting that this movement has reached the courts in such a short time. The Civil Rights movement took much longer to see time in a courtroom. Could that mean that OWS is considered bigger than the CRA, or people are ready to get OWS out of the way ASAP?
These encampments are becoming sanitation nightmares. Good for the judge, and I hope more weigh in on this in favor of cleaning out these temporary waste dumps. I think this is the beginning of the end of this phase of OWS. They're going to have to come up with some sort of organized method now to get their voices heard. Let's hope they actually focus on the real corruption in Washington now.
/TOAedit on 15-11-2011 by The Old American because: Finished my thoughts on this.