Let's kill the Pentagon Missile attack once and for all., page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 4-9-2004 @ 07:17 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Yes, lets kill this stupid missile hitting the Pentagon theory once and for all.

A plane, named flight 77, hit the pentagon. PERIOD.

Thousands of eyewitnesses everywhere on the ground all agreed they saw a plane. Jazzerman, your statement that eyewitness accounts should only be looked at if hard evidence is lacking sounds like something the govornment wouls day.

Thousands of people on the ground saw the plane. They watched it as it clipped the streetlights on the Beltway. They watched it conduct incredible maneuvers. And they watched it plow into the side of the pentagon.

The rescue workers recovered the bodies and remains of passengers who were on flight 77. They recovered wreckage.

Anyone who has ever been to the pentagon will understand both the video footage and the reason the plane is not scattered all over the law in big chunks.

The pentagon is a heavy duty super fortified hard concrete structure. It is VERY intimidating to look at. A plane is made of aluminum, a lightweight metal that does not hold up well under extreme heat and pressure and impact. Thus, a light weight craft of aluminum would accordion and crump[le, even parts vaporize, under the intense force and pressure of impact with the super hard bomb resistant concrete of the pentagon.

Pentagon employees on the inner rings were struck by the engine, which is harder than the body of an airplane. It was heavy and going at such a velocity ti was capable of punching through walls. Anyone who has ever seen aircraft engines up close and personal knows just how heavy duty those babies are.

Why was a plane not seen on the video footage?

Again, anyone who has been to the pentagon knows why.

The camera on the pentagon is designed for monitoring activity outside. Normal activity outside the pentagon includes people and vehicles. people and vehicles move MUCH slower than a plane. The camera at the pentagon was not designed to watch planes flying into it on the ground. It was designed to catch people and vehicles. Thus, the speed of the camera is considerably slower than one designed to film fast flying pbjects like jets. It was a camera at a guard post which monitors and admits people and vehicles into the premesis for parking. last time I checked, no known ground vehicles known to the public or driven in public travel 500 miles an hour.

the frame rate and refresh rate on the camera was simply not fast enough to catch something going 500 miules an hour. period.

A plane hit the pentagon. Thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground saw a plane. Many of those witnesses either worked for the military or have in the past. I would say its safe to say, that many of them would know damn well the difference between a plane and a friggin missile.

I consider the testimony of thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and such far better evidence and far more reliable than the idiotic insane ramblings of some Frenchman who was no where near the area, and probably never has been.

I have no doubt a plane hit the pentagon. My question is not what hit the pentagon, I already know: flight 77 and its doomed passengers and crew. My doubts are focused on why flight 77 was allowed to go wayward for 40 minutes after 2 planes hit the WTC with no response from Washington, no jets to pursue it, no massive securityu measures taken in the capitol.

A plane was flying erratically and change course towards the capitol for 40 minutes after two confirmed terrorists attacks. yet the city wasnt even alerted till 5 minutes before it hit. That in itself is enough to raise serious questions and eyebrows.

But I believe thousands of people, many experts, who witnessed the plane. They said it was a plane. All evidence Ive seen say it was a plane. It was a plane, period.


reply posted on 4-9-2004 @ 09:01 PM by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by SkibumHere we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.


Let us consider, as I have stated elsewhere, that the definition of a missile is anything that can be projected to a target. I have seen city ordinances that refer to flyers (paper advertisements placed on the windshields of cars) as missles. And let us consider that the audio of the interview with Rumsfeld was garbled to the extent that some of his statement was inaudible and since we are accustomed to taking a grain of truth and expanding beyond all recognition, reinterpret Rumsfeld's statement, to wit:

Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens as the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.


Can we not recognize the irony in the statement by the Secretary of Defense who is known for his wit, when he speaks of hijackers using plastic knives to hijack the aircraft filled with passengers and using those as missles to target the WTC and the Pentagon? Can we not see that the aircraft used in the attacks were, in fact, missles, even though they were not designed or catagorized as such? Did God design rocks to be thrown or are they not simply utilized particularly by Islamic extremists as weapons against the superior Isreali army?

Please, folks, let us deny ignorance not disseminate stupidity.

www.merriam-webster.com...

[edit on 04/9/4 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 4-9-2004 @ 09:40 PM by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by slank
Rumsfeld in an interview with Parade magazine:
Note: HE mentions the missile 'from out of the blue'
Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
Note: He clearly differentiates between the Airline flight at the WTC and the MISSILE at the pentagon.
www.the7thfire.com...

Just listen to it straight from the horses mouth.
.


Are you sure he wasnt misquoted

using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, as a missile to damage this building. That would change this whole statement

If this quote was real "using a American Airlines flight" as what? He never finished that statement.and why is there a (inaudible) part if they could understand him there how are we suppose to believe they didnt get other parts wrong.


I really dont see there being a huge cover up and then Rumsfeld just blows the whole thing in a interview that would be pretty dumb and a first that I know of.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 1 days ago with 103 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 13 days ago with 81 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 3 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 10 days ago with 42 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 5 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 6 hours ago, 57 replies
Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 15 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 11 hours ago, 52 replies