Serious leakage of high radioactivity in Germany , page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times


reply posted on 13-11-2011 @ 08:10 PM by muzzleflash
reply to post by Unity_99



I don't know what to tell you. I really don't.

It just sucks so incredibly bad. There isn't really any solutions at this point we are so far down the drain.

The best we could manage at this point is to
1) Find a way to get rid of the dangerous materials safely.
2) Find a way to clean up nano-sized radioactive particles flying around in the atmosphere or embedded within the soil. Like a electro-magnetic vacuum that only sucks in certain types of isotopes and contains them in a 'force field'.

Oh yeah and of course
3) Arrest all the scumbags behind the global criminal mafia network.



reply posted on 13-11-2011 @ 08:51 PM by Shadowalker
reply to post by Kemal




500 times more worried than you ever were apparently.

second? the first about covers it.


reply posted on 13-11-2011 @ 11:47 PM by UnixFE
reply to post by Dalke07


Stop the panic please. Althouth this isn't good and I (as a German) voted for an end of all nuclear reactor this isn't as bad as it might seem if you just read the 500x normal.

For a short period of time (a few seconds/minutes) the background radiation measured outside was 500x normal. So as we have 0.1 uSV/H as normal level here this would be 50uSV/h ( or 0.05mSV/h ). This is still really low and it lasted only a short time.

The real scandal here is that this low 'overdose' was hidden in the published radiation readings and no reason whatsoever given. The operator only publishes radiation values averaged over a longer time (hours/a day). As this peak was so short it didn't raise the hourly average an thus couldn't be seen in the official reports.

But this also means that it wasn't so bad. If you can't see the radian in an hourly average it probably was just a short opened door to a reactor building or whatsoever. Definitely not good but no reason for a panic.

I really don't like all the nuclear stuff and I hate what's still going on in Japan but please be scientific. If the hourly value is 500x normal we can start talking about some serious damage there. Also even this value would be 1000 times lower than normal background radiation in parts of Japan right now.


reply posted on 13-11-2011 @ 11:49 PM by UnixFE
reply to post by charles1952


The article talks about an independent group taking their own measurements. Although they measured this right in front of the plant it's not 100% sure it originated there. Also me best guess is that it does. If the operator was sure (and they should know it) that it wasn't from the plant the reaction would be a bit different.


reply posted on 14-11-2011 @ 03:48 AM by ManFromEurope
Nothing to see here. Local detector: Holzheim.

Anything in mayor German media: nope. Local news up to now, only.

We will see what comes out of this.


reply posted on 15-11-2011 @ 02:48 AM by ManFromEurope
Originally posted by Human0815
[ironic]
It was the Mossad because the Nazi Germans are in Bed with the Palestine!

or

HAARP done it via destructive Rays

or

The LHC in Geneve

or

insert by your own ....
[/ironic]

This is not good, Germany is much smaller than Japans
I hope there is another/ harmless reason for this readings!


Actually, Germany is about the
same size as Japan.
A greater problem is that the mentioned reactor is located not on a shore to a large ocean but in the center of Europe - so there is no saving winddrift towards an ocean, there are mayor cities in every direction..


Still nothing in mayor newsmedia, but a report with some insights as following (I will use google-translate as being lazy ):

"Gundremmingen: As little radioactive waste air as possible. The Greens (edit: German party for ecological sensible and responsible politics) call for the nuclear power plant Gundremmingen. There, elevated levels have been determined.

Defective fuel rods in nuclear power plant Gundremmingen have caused a significant increase in radioactivity in the vicinity of the plant. This confirms the power plant management, but stressed the threshold was met, not just by about 85 percent has been exceeded. Are included, however, is at the limit by a 24-hour average, in the upward or downward swings.

The nuclear-critical medical organization IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) has determined by its own account, that at the beginning of the annual revision to Block C in Gundremmingen suddenly more radioactive noble gases were released into the environment. Compared to the conventional values ​​of the radioactivity by almost 500-fold had grown. This peak was the Nuremberg physicist Alfred Köberlein on the evening of 22 September found. The power plant confirmed the "maximum discharge of noble gases" that day. It is stated that in the period from 19th to 25 September, the reactor pressure vessel of unit C is opened and damage had been detected in four of the 784 fuel assembly. The plant management emphasizes: "The system is designed so that there is also no risk of defects in fuel elements for the staff or the environment."

IPPNW, the organization has a different opinion, and speaks of "probable health effects of such emission peaks." Unborn children are particularly vulnerable in the womb.

The Greens in the Bavarian parliament calling on the Ministry of Environment of the Free State to ensure "that emissions be held after the technical feasibility as low as possible." For example, additional filters are installed, said the deputy Christine comb. In addition, the population must be informed in advance when such as radioactivity peaks on 22 September are foreseeable. "
Source
edi t on 15-11-2011 by ManFromEurope because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Southern California 53+ Earthquakes in the last 2 hours
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
Why 2013 will be a year of crisis
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
HAARP intensifying ISAAC?
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Zombie Apocalypse
  Posted 5 days ago with 0 member flags